Since you left Liz's board I guess we have to discuss this with you here.
Well, on Liz's board I was taunted by Dan's cheer leaders and Dan to report him. They were sure that that would somehow make a fool out of me. I felt there was in real life possible harm for Dan and/or his buddy and so would not act on their taunts. Thus I proposed to write up a nameless scenario changing the basic story somewhat, which I did and posted for their approval/modification.
No one taunted you and no one acted as Dan's cheerleaders. After you refused to listen to anyone's arguments and continued to beat the same incessant drum that Dan had committed a violation, I told you that if you were certain he was wrong, then report him--that way you would have a clear conscience AND you'd find out the truth. Then rather than go ahead and report it yourself, you had the gall to try and get someone else to do it for you! Since NONE of the rest of us had any interest in reporting it, for various reasons, why on earth would any of us want to do it????
This was one of the most outrageous things I've seen you do--and then to have the nerve to complain about it!
I was then going to send two questions to the privacy department of the church; 1. would this scenario be a violation of policy? 2. what would be the punishment for such a violation be?
I proposed to send this off in an email with Liz copied and to then have Liz report the answers.
Yes, this was all your proposal, no one wanted any part of it. I think only Harmony was concerned about it being a violation, but even she had no interest in reporting it--ONLY YOU. A number of us reiterated that if you were so committed to the belief that it was a violation, you should take care of it, not try to drag others into your plan.
Dan immediately posted a response somewhat similar to: "do what you must quickly". Of course comparing what I was doing to Judas being a traitor to Jesus.
I took this to mean that Dan was indeed worried about this and that I would be pulling the ultimate betrayal if I was to send it (which I dropped at this point)
Once again, you read things into what other people say. I think he meant that you ought to do what you felt you had to do. Was it a nice thing to do? To turn Dan in and try to get him in trouble? Not in any normal world it is not, but in my world, if you feel so strongly that a wrong has been committed, you should act, if for no reason than to feel that you did the right thing.
I just do not get you, Rock. You are still going on about this and complaining about others who disagreed with you?
It's amazing that he is now taunting the public to again turn him and Greg, um I mean his buddy in.
Crazy s***
This continual naming of a person you think is 'guilty' when you have no proof is not cute. And no one is 'taunting' you. They are asking you to act on your conscience if that is truly what is bothering you. But, if you act out of spite and hatred, you will have to live with yourself.
