Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologetics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _stemelbow »

Bumping this board is showing the ridiculous nature of your guys' whining.

you guys can't be serious on this. Such drama! Such intrigue!
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _stemelbow »

Stormy Waters wrote:There is no way in hell that if a bishops name had appeared on that list they wouldn't have followed through. They no doubt would have felt an 'obligation' to report Everybody Wang Chung to church authorities and to do that they would have needed confirmation.
Stop posturing just because the search failed to get the desired results.

But all of that is besides the point of this thread.


Are you joking? If a bishop appeared there would be no way to tell it was Everybody Wang Chung anywho.

But that is all beside the point because Everybody Wang Chung lied. So, there was absolutely no infringement on people's private information. oh wait...being a bishop isn't private...but whatever. Everyone throw their arms up int he air and pout to their hearts content anywho.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

Darth J wrote:Please copy and paste the language of the license agreement permitting a "reasonable request" regarding a personal curiosity about an anonymous message board poster that has nothing to do with official LDS Church business.


Please don’t forget the fact that what Dan finds reasonable necessarily entails what the Church finds reasonable. DAN AND THE CHURCH ARE ONE IN THE SAME YOU FOOL!
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

stemelbow wrote:
Are you joking? If a bishop appeared there would be no way to tell it was Everybody Wang Chung anywho.

But that is all beside the point because Everybody Wang Chung lied.



Anyone else see the contradiction there?
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Kishkumen »

MrStakhanovite wrote:
stemelbow wrote:
Are you joking? If a bishop appeared there would be no way to tell it was Everybody Wang Chung anywho.

But that is all beside the point because Everybody Wang Chung lied.



Anyone else see the contradiction there?


stem doesn't because he is a moron with a crush on DCP.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Alter Idem
_Emeritus
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:24 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _Alter Idem »

There is no way in hell that if a bishops name had appeared on that list they wouldn't have followed through. They no doubt would have felt an 'obligation' to report Everybody Wang Chung to church authorities and to do that they would have needed confirmation.
Stop posturing just because the search failed to get the desired results.

But all of that is besides the point of this thread.


Okay, if your paranoid scenario came true,

what would they report Everybody Wang Chung for?

"Hey, Salt Lake, this guy who was on my tour and is a Bishop might be the same guy who's been telling everyone he's a Bishop and saying mean things about me!!" :rolleyes:
Every man is a moon and has a [dark] side which he turns toward nobody; you have to slip around behind if you want to see it. ---Mark Twain
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _stemelbow »

MrStakhanovite wrote:Please don’t forget the fact that what Dan finds reasonable necessarily entails what the Church finds reasonable. DAN AND THE CHURCH ARE ONE IN THE SAME YOU FOOL!


If you disagree then turn them in, you weenie. Once the Church sees this egregious act or what it is, then everyone will be happy, right?

No. We know you all still be pouting about how Dan said this or Dan did that, or some other such junk.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _stemelbow »

MrStakhanovite wrote:Anyone else see the contradiction there?


I'm just saying it's cute you guys continue to maintain that he didn't lie. Cute indeed.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _stemelbow »

Alter Idem wrote:Okay, if your paranoid scenario came true,

what would they report Everybody Wang Chung for?

"Hey, Salt Lake, this guy who was on my tour and is a Bishop might be the same guy who's been telling everyone he's a Bishop and saying mean things about me!!" :rolleyes:


hah...they are an adorable whiney bunch though.

What if Everybody Wang Chung were a bishop and he was actually released because he's been excessively nasty to people on the internet. why that would be a terrible tragedy.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologet

Post by _stemelbow »

Kishkumen wrote:stem doesn't because he is a moron with a crush on DCP.


oh stop your inconsistent belly-aching. I love my wife and haven't had a crush on a man in years, long before I knew of DCP. :smile:
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
Post Reply