Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologetics

[_stemelbow]

I have to admit that this level of passive aggression may be tricky to program. So the game here is to annoy people until they insult you and then double down on the persecution card right? That's what I'll go with for now.
Again a flow chart to give me insights into your thought process would be helpful.
Help me to help you Stem.
Thanks buddy.

So you must equate, then, addressing questions/concerns with annoying people. Weird way to justify the anger around here though.

I've found it's easy to annoy the angry. Indeed you don't have to do much of anything to annoy them. They generally are annoyed before anything is said.

[_Molok]

So you must equate, then, addressing questions/concerns with annoying people.

That would require you to address questions / concerns, so no, he isn't.

[_stemelbow]

Hmmm....have we found the OND's weakness? It seems that when confronted with over the top sarcasm and mockery, he slinks away with his tail between his legs like the coward he is.

Don't fret, hostile dude. Life hits and things take me a way for a spell. When I get time I come along and read things and then determine whether I feel like saying anything or not. Seriously...i'm not sure what coward has to do with any of this.

[_Molok]

Hmmm....have we found the OND's weakness? It seems that when confronted with over the top sarcasm and mockery, he slinks away with his tail between his legs like the coward he is.

Don't fret.

I'm not. I just wish you would stop calling me names. You should probably let go of all that cancerous rage inside you.

[_Everybody Wang Chung]

Stemelbow ought to take a cue from [deleted], of the "I'm a Mormon" Campaign:

[image deleted]

Stem, that was a great profile!

[Guest]

eh, I'll take this one back.

[_stemelbow]

That would require you to address questions / concerns, so no, he isn't.

So the issue of this thread is defined as, Did Dan break Church rules?

The answer from the OPs perspective is yes. I said no.

The next issue defnined is did he do what he did in pursuit of mopologetics. I said no.

For that we've taken quite a few pages to discuss me--thanks to you, DJ, and Stormy. Why do you guys insist on whining about me? Not sure. But, it does become quite a spectacle. Its weird, in fact, its like you don't even realize the things you are saying. You actually justify your hostility due to being bored or because you get annoyed by my responses to the topic.

Weird stuff.

[_Molok]

That would require you to address questions / concerns, so no, he isn't.

So the issue of this thread is defined as, Did Dan break Church rules?

The answer from the OPs perspective is yes. I said no.

The next issue defnined is did he do what he did in pursuit of mopologetics. I said no.

Good for you for getting that far. Admittedly, that's much farther than you usually get. Would you like a cookie?

[_stemelbow]

I'm not. I just wish you would stop calling me names. You should probably let go of all that cancerous rage inside you.

No problem. I won't call you names like hostile dude. I don't' know that I can easily stop calling you out on your hostile behavior though. I didn't know you would take such exception.

[_stemelbow]

eh, I'll take this one back.

Good show. A step in the right direction. Showing some amount of self-control is a sign for bigger things to come.