Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologetics

[_Everybody Wang Chung]

It doesn't matter to you if someone not on your side has his anonymity compromised here.

Stem, have you had your anonymity compromised? Who are you talking about?

The real issue here is the highly unethical (perhaps even illegal) conduct of Daniel C. Peterson.

Stem, please no more derails. Somewhere an angel cries every time you derail a thread.

[_Molok]

It doesn't matter to you if someone not on your side has his anonymity compromised here.

Since you seem to have some difficulty grasping this concept, let me repeat myself. I care plenty about my anonymity. I care plenty about other people's as well. In fact, you're the only person who's anonymity I don't care one bit about, because in my view, when you attempt to be a professional troll, you can't complain when people troll you back. If you need me to repeat this again, go ahead and bleat the same response again, I don't mind explaining it until you understand. I'm patient like that.

[_sock puppet]

For the record, I would note that the CDOL is accessible to users who serve in positions other than bishop. At the ward level, the following can access it: bishop, bishopric counselors, ward clerk, assistant clerks, and executive secretary.

But not the public at large, and not even the LDS membership at large. Hmmm.

[_sock puppet]

That would require you to address questions / concerns, so no, he isn't.

So the issue of this thread is defined as, Did Dan break Church rules?

The answer from the OPs perspective is yes. I said no.

The next issue defnined is did he do what he did in pursuit of mopologetics. I said no.

For that we've taken quite a few pages to discuss me--thanks to you, DJ, and Stormy. Why do you guys insist on whining about me? Not sure. But, it does become quite a spectacle. Its weird, in fact, its like you don't even realize the things you are saying. You actually justify your hostility due to being bored or because you get annoyed by my responses to the topic.

Weird stuff.

So any discussion beyond just "yes" or "no" constitutes "whining" in your view?

[_Molok]

Hey Sock Puppet; In his defense, "yes" or "no" is better than his usual.

[_MrStakhanovite]

I'd like to get this thread to page 42 before Friday night. Stem, you are gonna have to clock some overtime, but I think you can do it.

Thanks everyone!

[_stemelbow]

Stem, have you had your anonymity compromised? Who are you talking about?

The real issue here is the highly unethical (perhaps even illegal) conduct of Daniel C. Peterson.

Stem, please no more derails. Somewhere an angel cries every time you derail a thread.

Hey Chung. I'm not talking about myself. You can read the posts just as well as anyone. If you wish to pretend its not there, be my guest.

Also, as you will note, I came in here speaking to the topic of this thread. When I did, DJ, Molok, Stormy, you and others took us off course. Did I respond to their off-topic rants and directions? Yep. But you can't expect me to do otherwise when a moderator here who thinks I'm evil when DJ takes threads off-course, takes things off-course willy-nilly.

[_sock puppet]

Can you help me understand what you mean by harassing people on the internet?

Sure, I would be referring to your practice of sewing discord here for no other reason than your own personal amusement.

My theory is that stem thinks he's "on a mission from god" to try to frustrate critics into not posting on the 'net, so that doubting members and investigators won't Google upon us and the criticisms. It seems to me that stem is purposefully trying to derail and stifle. And for just one troll, he's accomplished quite a bit actually.

[_stemelbow]

Since you seem to have some difficulty grasping this concept, let me repeat myself. I care plenty about my anonymity. I care plenty about other people's as well. In fact, you're the only person who's anonymity I don't care one bit about, because in my view, when you attempt to be a professional troll, you can't complain when people troll you back. If you need me to repeat this again, go ahead and bleat the same response again, I don't mind explaining it until you understand. I'm patient like that.

So let's get this back on topic again, I know its tough to do so for you.

I deserve to be outed because I come here to comment on the topic only to have you and others complain relentlessly about me. Everybody Wang Chung does not deserve to be found out a liar because he is on your team?

Great. It's all come together again.

[_sock puppet]

Hey Sock Puppet; In his defense, "yes" or "no" is better than his usual.

Word to your Molok!