Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologetics

[_Tator]

To Dan's fan club:

Just so I am clear (no reference to Scientology) it is OK and ethical for Dan to be judge, jury, prosecutor, detective, executioner, hit man, etc. to find a Bishop's identity or someone claiming to be a Bishop on an obscure little message board in cyberspace that might have attended a tour to Israel and it is OK and ethical to "out" them for the higher good of his own interests and his church.

But it is not OK or ethical for him to expose a real Bishop that broke real ethical rules and standards set by the very Church that they claim is the only true church. This truth is not convenient and does not fit Dan's "ethics", etc..........

Oh fudge, for get it, guess what I ain't clear on any of this because anything to do with logic, truth, ethics, common sense and Dan is a confusing mess which is no different than trying to understand why me.

[_sock puppet]

The cult of personality around Dan have no problem with Dan applying double standards, when it fits his purposes.

[_Doctor Scratch]

Isn't Daniel Oswald, a member of Mormon Interpreter's board, currently serving as a bishop in Sandy, UT?

[_Everybody Wang Chung]

Isn't Daniel Oswald, a member of Mormon Interpreter's board, currently serving as a bishop in Sandy, UT?

Dr. Scratch,

Very interesting. It looks like you very well may have solved the mystery of which bishop provided DCP the information.

[_3sheets2thewind]

Isn't Daniel Oswald, a member of Mormon Interpreter's board, currently serving as a bishop in Sandy, UT?

Dr. Scratch,

Very interesting. It looks like you very well may have solved the mystery of which bishop provided DCP the information.

But isn't Gregory Smith, Mckay Evans (rongo), bcspace....aren't these all purported to be in positions with access to the CDOL.

And as cafetria as they are, I wouldn't put it past anyone of them.

[_3sheets2thewind]

Quite honestly, I do not think there can be a short list of suspects among those who call themselves apologists. Too many have shown there their true colors, which includes their willingness to make false claims, deny incovenient teachings/ claims, just all around be a cafeteria person, in defense of what they hold dear.

In my opinion those willing to "lie for their cause" certainly have the mind set to make false representations to access the CDOL, as their fanaticism tells them it is for the greater good of the cause.

[_Tator]

I received an interesting item in my PM box earlier today. I owe a debt of "thanks" to the informant who brought this material to my attention. Very interesting stuff.

Unfortunately, the interesting item has absolutely nothing to do with this thread and would be a complete derailment to post it in this thread. The only purpose for posting would be to move this thread to the top of the list and increase the number of posts in this thread.

[_malkie]

I received an interesting item in my PM box earlier today. I owe a debt of "thanks" to the informant who brought this material to my attention. Very interesting stuff.

Unfortunately, the interesting item has absolutely nothing to do with this thread and would be a complete derailment to post it in this thread. The only purpose for posting would be to move this thread to the top of the list and increase the number of posts in this thread.

That being the case, I can totally understand why you would (or would not) want to post a comment on this thread about an interesting item in your PM box.

Thank you. Now that you have shown the way, I know where to post a notification if I ever receive an interesting item in my PM box.

Look out, Twitter - your days are numbered ...

[Guest]

-

[_TrashcanMan79]

I was the 14,000th view. No big deal.