They don't wan't to tax "all" business... Telling psychology

[_ldsfaqs]

Obama: 'We Don't Want to Tax All Businesses Out of Business'

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/oba ... t-business

There is no reason he needed to say "all".
Further, if you look at some of his other statements as the article points out, it is clear his views. He doesn't care at all if liberals tax many businesses out of business. Because it's not "all" it's OKAY.

You liberals aren't on the truth and right side. You are "left" for a reason. Perversion, warped.

[_Tarski]

Obama: 'We Don't Want to Tax All Businesses Out of Business'

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/oba ... t-business

There is no reason he needed to say "all".
Further, if you look at some of his other statements as the article points out, it is clear his views. He doesn't care at all if liberals tax many businesses out of business. Because it's not "all" it's OKAY.

You liberals aren't on the truth and right side. You are "left" for a reason. Perversion, warped.

uh huh, sure. He wants to tax some businesses out of business. Riiiight. One wonders, umm, WHY exactly?
Because he is a Kenyan Muslim who hates America?

Stop listening to Sean Hannity and you might break free of this reality distortion field.
Retelling this story while putting a false vocal emphasis on the word all is the usual desperate dishonesty that Hannity and his ilk depend on. If their message was based in reality at all then they wouldn't need to resort to this. But they do resort to this and so their message cannot be based in reality.

Hannity is a jingoistic, and sebaceous used car salesman type character as anyone with a lick of sense can surmise instantly.

[_subgenius]

Nice reply Tarski, an article written by Elizabeth about remarks made by Obama at a fundraiser, and your rebuttal is to attack Hannity...clever yet really just a moronic tactic.

[_Tarski]

Nice reply Tarski, an article written by Elizabeth about remarks made by Obama at a fundraiser, and your rebuttal is to attack Hannity...clever yet really just a moronic tactic.

It is only a coincidence that whatever Hannity et. al. are ranting about, you two come here and give the same rant.

You can't handle the simple reply:

OBAMA DOESN"T WANT TO TAX BUSINESSES OUT OF BUSINESS! Not all, not some, not any.
You people need to get a grip.

[_ldsfaqs]

Ya, it's just in our "imaginations" when he said he was going to implement laws and taxes that would put various coal plants out of business, and his many other statements in similar vain.

Further, why are you the predictable liberal and "ignoring" his usage of the word "ALL" and the "out of business"?
Again, if he wasn't meaning what we think he was meaning, he would have simply said he's not going to tax all businesses, or not going to tax businesses out of business.

But that's not what he said, he said he's not going to tax ALL businesses out of business.
Do you comprehend English? The "all" and the "out of business" statement makes clear his meaning and thinking.

These are HIS WORDS..... Not some "Hannity" conspiracy.
Further, I don't have Cable for years now. I study everything on the net, and don't get my news from him. I get it almost everywhere else. I especially like PJTV. A lot of smart folks on there.

[_Tarski]

Ya, it's just in our "imaginations" when he said he was going to implement laws and taxes that would put various coal plants out of business, and his many other statements in similar vain.

Further, why are you the predictable liberal and "ignoring" his usage of the word "ALL" and the "out of business"?
Again, if he wasn't meaning what we think he was meaning, he would have simply said he's not going to tax all businesses, or not going to tax businesses out of business.

But that's not what he said, he said he's not going to tax ALL businesses out of business.
Do you comprehend English? The "all" and the "out of business" statement makes clear his meaning and thinking.

These are HIS WORDS..... Not some "Hannity" conspiracy.
Further, I don't have Cable for years now. I study everything on the net, and don't get my news from him. I get it almost everywhere else. I especially like PJTV. A lot of smart folks on there.

Do you want to tax all businesses out of business? Yes or no?

It is either yes or no. Pick one.
NO?

Then you don't want to tax all businesses out of business. (and thereby agree with Obama exactly.)

He used the word "all" as a rhetorical devise; it implied that this is what his opponents would like to claim (that he wants to ruin all business). Whether that playful implied accusation is accurate or not is beside the point. You are misrepresenting the sense of the sentence.

The emphasis was not put on the word "all" and this difference of inflection is what makes all the difference in the world as to the meaning.
But you guys don't really care what he meant.

[_ldsfaqs]

Of course we care what he meant, that's why we are making clear what he meant.

Further, the other clear evidences of HIS WORDS, makes clear his actual views.
So, spin your lie all you want, his views are already known.

He want's to destroy businesses that he doesn't agree with, he's said it directly.
No need for your misrepresenting word play. We can see for ourselves his intent.

Again, even if your claim is correct, he WOULD NOT HAVE SAID ALL.

He would have said "I'm not going to tax ANY business out of business", if his view was that he didn't want to destroy businesses at all.
Use your brain, instead of swallowing the kool aid.

[_krose]

Do you comprehend English? The "all" and the "out of business" statement makes clear his meaning and thinking.

Come on, Tarski. Do not question faq's language expertise. Can't you tell by his impressive grammar skills and his clear, concise writing style that he is linguistically unimpeachable?

[_Brackite]

Obama: 'We Don't Want to Tax All Businesses Out of Business'

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/oba ... t-business

There is no reason he needed to say "all".
Further, if you look at some of his other statements as the article points out, it is clear his views. He doesn't care at all if liberals tax many businesses out of business. Because it's not "all" it's OKAY.

You liberals aren't on the truth and right side. You are "left" for a reason. Perversion, warped.

OKAY, This is from an Obama speech recently in California. California is the worst State for businesses while having the highest income and sales tax rates in the Nation.

Proposition 30: Yet another way California screws entrepreneurs over

Because of asset seizures, I am starting my new company outside California

2013 Best & Worst States for Business

[_Tarski]

Again, even if your claim is correct, he WOULD NOT HAVE SAID ALL.

Yes he would. I explained the sense of his usage and you don't get it.


Here is ldsfaqs talking to a Muslim:

ldsfaqs: So you are a Muslim?

Abdul: Yes.

ldsfaqs: So then you want to kill all Americans. Right?


Abdul: Huh? No I do not want to kill all Americans. (no vocal emphasis on the word "all".)

ldsfaqs: Ah ha! So you just want to kill some Americans!

Abdul: No, I didn't say that.

ldsfaqs: But you must mean that or you wouldn't have used the word "all".

Abdul: You are an idiot.


Tarski: Actually, yes he is.