I Wonder?

[_beastie]

I'm starting to come around with ldsfaqs. The Liberals on this board are vile, sneering hypocrites. There's no freaking way any one of them would allow themselves to be pummeled without defending themselves.

I suppose they would just hope someone would rescue them from a beating.

Wait.

Kind of like no one did with GZ.

- D

And I'm beginning to think your reading comprehension is as problematic as ldsfaqs.

No one has asserted that GZ did not have a right to defend himself.

[_ldsfaqs]

I didn't call you evil, just hateful and bigoted. You hate
(what you define as) anti-Mormons with a burning passion.

And do you know why I hate anti-mormons?
Because the things you people say are no different than Fanatical Islam or the KKK.
Even the Anti-Defaimation League has condemed various anti-mormon works as bigotry, and you guys say the EXACT same things.

Bearing false witness and unfairly and unrighteously degrading is bigotry.
I don't believe in a lot of things, but I don't bear false witness or unfairly belittle them. NEVER.
But you people do in almost every word you say about Mormons and Mormonism.

Understand the difference.

Please read carefully prior to responding. Thanks.
Curious about where you went on your mission. No need to be
too specific. Thanks again.

Have a nice day!
Sorry you think I'm a slimeball. You don't even know me.

I don't have to know you.... I see your words. You condemned me for condemning wrong, that makes you in the wrong.

I didn't go on a mission, but people who have known me have always thought I have given my character. So, you don't know me.

[_ldsfaqs]

And I'm beginning to think your reading comprehension is as problematic as ldsfaqs.

No one has asserted that GZ did not have a right to defend himself.

Which makes you a liar because that is EXACTLY what you people have been saying.
You've been saying Zimmerman was in the wrong, NOT TRAYVON.
You've been saying all kinds of things about Zimmerman and ZERO about Trayvon.
You disagree with the verdict, saying Zimmerman didn't have the right to defend himself, that he SHOULD HAVE BEEN convicted.

Try again liar. We see your words.

[_Quasimodo]

And I'm beginning to think your reading comprehension is as problematic as ldsfaqs.

No one has asserted that GZ did not have a right to defend himself.

Which makes you a liar because that is EXACTLY what you people have been saying.
You've been saying Zimmerman was in the wrong, NOT TRAYVON.
You've been saying all kinds of things about Zimmerman and ZERO about Trayvon.
You disagree with the verdict, saying Zimmerman didn't have the right to defend himself, that he SHOULD HAVE BEEN convicted.

Try again liar. We see your words.

Please, ldsfaqs, consider not using the words "lie" and "liar". It just makes you sound stupid.

People that disagree with you are not lying. They just have a different opinion. If you want to experience less insulting comments towards yourself, stop insulting other people.

[_beastie]

Please, ldsfaqs, consider not using the words "lie" and "liar". It just makes you sound stupid.

People that disagree with you are not lying. They just have a different opinion. If you want to experience less insulting comments towards yourself, stop insulting other people.

I'm not surprised that ldsfaqs hasn't grasped the point - that would be expected. I do find it's curious that cam hasn't been able to grasp the point, either.

[_beastie]

I'm starting to come around with ldsfaqs. The Liberals on this board are vile, sneering hypocrites. There's no freaking way any one of them would allow themselves to be pummeled without defending themselves.

I suppose they would just hope someone would rescue them from a beating.

Wait.

Kind of like no one did with GZ.

- D

Oh, and by the way, I doubt that any conservative on this board would be comfortable with someone obviously following them the way GZ followed TM. I dare to guess that a few of them would feel justified in punching the stalker in the nose, as well.

[_schreech]

WOW.... utterly WOW....!!!

You show your bigotry and low class by mocking a fat and partially r******* kid.

Further, if you had actually been READING the thread, you would know what "Stevie Wonder" had to do with anything. Instead, you post further bigotry and slander of me.

You should be sad for yourself, you are a sad little small minded bigoted man.

Sheesh, what makes you think that child is retarded? Just because the child is fat doesn't mean he has a learning disability...that's pretty harsh. I was just thinking you post like an overly excited, spastic child with a limited vocabulary and an elementary grasp of logic. You also seem too dim to actually think issues through on your own and rely heavily on what your am radio overlords tell you to believe...Only small minded bigots (who haven't mentally progressed beyond Jr high), like yourself, look at the world in black and white, liberal/conservative, Mormon/anit-mormon, etc.

Please also tell me:

"WTF does singing stevie wonder and Lionel Richie have to do with anything??? Is that the closest you have ever come to "interacting" with an "actual" african american?"

Is this the closest thing you have to saying you have a black friend? Again, I am sad for you...I hope that, one day, you (as a christian) actually try to live the teachings of Jesus Christ.

by the way, when do expect GZ to die by the concealed weapon?

[_beastie]

I'm starting to come around with ldsfaqs. The Liberals on this board are vile, sneering hypocrites. There's no freaking way any one of them would allow themselves to be pummeled without defending themselves.

I suppose they would just hope someone would rescue them from a beating.

Wait.

Kind of like no one did with GZ.

- D

Since some of our posters need things spelled out very slowly, I'll be more explicit.

I would have had zero problems with GZ defending himself with his fists. This was a fistfight. The problem I have is when GZ decided to defend himself by killing TM.

Has our society reached the point where some people are so filled with hubris and bravado that they really feel justified in shooting someone for a punch in the nose? That type of bravado usually is a cloak for cowardice.

[_schreech]

Since some of our posters need things spelled out very slowly, I'll be more explicit.

I would have had zero problems with GZ defending himself with his fists. This was a fistfight. The problem I have is when GZ decided to defend himself by killing TM.

Has our society reached the point where some people are so filled with hubris and bravado that they really feel justified in shooting someone for a punch in the nose? That type of bravado usually is a cloak for cowardice.

If you are cut off in traffic, does that justify shooting the other driver? http://abcnews.go.com/US/suspect-sought-alleged-fatal-florida-road-rage-shooting/story?id=19536857

What kind of insecure coward needs to chase someone down and shoot them because they were unhappy with the way another driver was handling their vehicle? Im guessing LDSfaqs thinks that the shooter was justified because he felt "threatened". Live by the improper merge, die by the handgun....

[_Brackite]

And do you know why I hate anti-mormons?

From The Book of Mormon:

3 Nephi 12:

[43] And behold it is written also, that thou shalt love thy neighbor and hate thine enemy;

[44] But I say unto you, love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them who despitefully use you and persecute you;

[45] That ye may be the children of your Father who is in heaven; for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good.

[46] Therefore those things which were of old time, which were under the law, in me are all fulfilled.