Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the water

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Steve Benson
_Emeritus
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:15 am

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Steve Benson »

Kishkumen wrote:
Steve Benson wrote:Try to at least sew it up by bearing us your testimony.



You see, Doc, there is only one thing that we can conclude about you if you fail to agree with certain people's arguments against Mormonism.

Welcome to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.


You see, Kish, that Doc has provided no meaningful counter evidence. At this point, I am trying to help him out of his faithful pickle by suggesting he bear his testimony. It is a tried and true fallback in your world, as you know.
Last edited by Guest on Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Kishkumen »

Steve Benson wrote:You see, Kish, that Doc has provided no meaningful counter evidence.


And that means that he is a Mormon apologist?
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Kishkumen »

Steve Benson wrote:You see, Kish, that Doc has provided no meaningful counter evidence.



I should add that I don't give a tinker's damn about Monson's stories. I am not at all invested in them, and I would hope that anyone with an ounce of brains would not hang their important personal life decisions on these tales or the ones in which he might have brought a widow a pie instead of a cake.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Steve Benson
_Emeritus
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:15 am

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Steve Benson »

Kishkumen wrote:
Steve Benson wrote:You see, Kish, that Doc has provided no meaningful counter evidence.


And that means that he is a Mormon apologist?


This means that he has nothing critical to say of Monson's nonsense narratives, noting that they are intended to promote faith, while at the same time he is criticizing ex-Mormons. If it walks and talks like a Latter-Day duck, it probably is one.
Last edited by Guest on Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Darth J »

I agree with Steve Benson that this board has seen enough of DrCamNC4Me's relentless cheerleading for LDS truth claims.

I have never seen him refute the point that there have been thousands of edits to the Book of Mormon, either.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Kishkumen »

Steve Benson wrote:At this point, I am trying to help him out of his faithful pickle by suggesting he bear his testimony. It is a tried and true fallback in your world, as you know.


He does not have a faithful pickle. He probably just thinks you have your panties in a bunch over something that isn't terribly important. I share that opinion.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Darth J »

You know, Steve, there are some people who have suggested that you might be.....how can I put this delicately......damned insane.

Thanks for logging on to Mormon Discussions to set the record straight.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Darth J »

Dupe.
Last edited by Guest on Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Kishkumen »

Steve Benson wrote:If it walks and talks like a Latter-Day duck, it probably is one.


Snap judgments made from a position of ignorance have no place in your personal history.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Steve Benson
_Emeritus
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:15 am

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Steve Benson »

Kishkumen wrote:
Steve Benson wrote:At this point, I am trying to help him out of his faithful pickle by suggesting he bear his testimony. It is a tried and true fallback in your world, as you know.


He does not have a faithful pickle. He probably just thinks you have your panties in a bunch over something that isn't terribly important. I share that opinion.


I agree with you that the truth is not terribly important in Mormonism.
Post Reply