Darth J wrote:"You're pathetic," said a perpetual virgin who thinks that there really was a group of Bronze Age refugees who left Mesopotamia in a flotilla of wooden submarines and created a vast, advanced civilization in America....
...of which no trace remains.
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
Darth J wrote:"You're pathetic," said a perpetual virgin who thinks that there really was a group of Bronze Age refugees who left Mesopotamia in a flotilla of wooden submarines and created a vast, advanced civilization in America.
There are at least four errors in this sentence. Can you find them all?
Hint: Darth J calling himself pathetic is not one of them.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics "I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Darth J wrote:"You're pathetic," said a perpetual virgin who thinks that there really was a group of Bronze Age refugees who left Mesopotamia in a flotilla of wooden submarines and created a vast, advanced civilization in America.
There are at least four errors in this sentence. Can you find them all?
Hint: Darth J calling himself pathetic is not one of them.
I'm struggling to find the fourth....
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
The Nehor, you are angry because you are disregarding the Brethren's inspired counsel about rated R movies. Wickedness never was happiness.
The Prophet Joseph Smith taught that the way one can know a man has repented is he confesses and forsakes his sins. I exhort you to acknowledge that you have set the Bretheren's inspired counsel at naught, and to resolve to be obedient by ceasing to participate in the devilish corruption of rated R movies.
After you have removed this beam from your own eye, we can get back to our discussion of the complete lack of evidence for any of the Book of Mormon civilizations ever actually existing, thus giving some context to your calling stupid all and sundry who fail to believe that Joseph Smith's most famous novel represents actual history.
Darth J wrote:After you have removed this beam from your own eye, we can get back to our discussion of the complete lack of evidence for any of the Book of Mormon civilizations ever actually existing, thus giving some context to your calling stupid all and sundry who fail to believe that Joseph Smith's most famous novel represents actual history.
That is not what we were discussing though. I do not believe that everyone who disbelieves the Book of Mormon is stupid. I know many smart people who doubt or outright disbelieve. I do believe it is profoundly stupid to mock it while being wrong about the thing you mock. I also believe it is even more shockingly stupid to defend the former stupidity.
This also isn't evidence of the Book of Mormon being discussed. Being incredulous about something is not evidence. Sadly pretty much all this board has ever had is incredulity laced with adolescent sarcasm so I guess you have to work with what you have. I guess dealing with evidence would require hard things like actually reading primary sources and the even more difficult task for many her of being able to understand it if they would actually read it.
So I guess I should just pat you on the head for trying. Good job.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics "I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Darth J wrote:After you have removed this beam from your own eye, we can get back to our discussion of the complete lack of evidence for any of the Book of Mormon civilizations ever actually existing, thus giving some context to your calling stupid all and sundry who fail to believe that Joseph Smith's most famous novel represents actual history.
That is not what we were discussing though. I do not believe that everyone who disbelieves the Book of Mormon is stupid. I know many smart people who doubt or outright disbelieve. I do believe it is profoundly stupid to mock it while being wrong about the thing you mock. I also believe it is even more shockingly stupid to defend the former stupidity.
This also isn't evidence of the Book of Mormon being discussed. Being incredulous about something is not evidence. Sadly pretty much all this board has ever had is incredulity laced with adolescent sarcasm so I guess you have to work with what you have. I guess dealing with evidence would require hard things like actually reading primary sources and the even more difficult task for many her of being able to understand it if they would actually read it.
So I guess I should just pat you on the head for trying. Good job.
Hello Mr. The Nehor,
Aside from the idea that the Book of Mormon truth claims ought to be self-evident, what hard facts do you possess that could convince the critic and/or non-Believer otherwise?
V/R Doctor Cameron
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Aside from the idea that the Book of Mormon truth claims ought to be self-evident, what hard facts do you possess that could convince the critic and/or non-Believer otherwise?
I never stated that the truth claims should be self-evident. I also do not claim to have hard facts that could convince anyone. Oh, there is evidence for it but not evidence that will convince everyone.
I consider you such a pawn of the devil that I believe you would be very difficult to convince. Well, probably not a pawn of the devil or any of his high-ranking or even middling minions. More likely the pawn of some demon that got spiritually kicked in the head by his mule a few too many times and has been a bit slow ever since.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics "I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Aside from the idea that the Book of Mormon truth claims ought to be self-evident, what hard facts do you possess that could convince the critic and/or non-Believer otherwise?
I never stated that the truth claims should be self-evident. I also do not claim to have hard facts that could convince anyone. Oh, there is evidence for it but not evidence that will convince everyone.
I consider you such a pawn of the devil that I believe you would be very difficult to convince. Well, probably not a pawn of the devil or any of his high-ranking or even middling minions. More likely the pawn of some demon that got spiritually kicked in the head by his mule a few too many times and has been a bit slow ever since.
Why shouldn't the truth claims of the Book of Mormon be self-evident?
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
Bazooka wrote:Why shouldn't the truth claims of the Book of Mormon be self-evident?
Because without spiritual strength and confirmation from testimony outside the facts a simple belief or even conviction that the Book of Mormon is a true account is useless. In fact it is dangerous and damning. It would lead to a spate of baptisms of people uncommitted to the faith.
The Book of Mormon says that when the Book of Mormon (and the Bible) are proven then you can expect the judgements of God to be poured out on the earth for its continued rejection.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics "I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo