Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormon

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_DrW
_Emeritus
Posts: 7222
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am

Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo

Post by _DrW »

Yahoo Bot wrote:You must be very interesting at parties or class reunions. Presuming that you are invited to parties or that people will want to sit at your table.

Hello Bot,

Actually, I'm a pretty innocuous individual in real life. I get along well with my colleagues, keep pretty much to myself, and don't say much unless asked. I try to stay away from parties, class reunions, and all but patent attorneys, whenever possible.

However, I did think that DrDarbyLDS might benefit from knowing a little more about the fruits of the critical thinking skills he holds in such low regard.
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."

DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo

Post by _EAllusion »

DrW wrote:However, I did think that DrDarbyLDS might benefit from knowing a little more about the fruits of the critical thinking skills he holds in such low regard.



Again, Dr. Darby is Stak. Obviously. And he's needlingly me because I hold in low regard smug skeptics who strut around with the phrase "critical thinking" when it is either empty of content or filled with naïve beliefs about how to analyze ideas. He's grouping me with something he knows we share a dislike of.
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo

Post by _Quasimodo »

SteelHead wrote:When did the thread go from archeology to grammar?


Since there isn't enough Nephite archeology to fill a thread (or even a single post), I'm hoping the discussions turns to the proper use of grammar in reformed Egyptian.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_DrW
_Emeritus
Posts: 7222
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am

Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo

Post by _DrW »

EAllusion wrote:Again, Dr. Darby is Stak. Obviously. And he's needlingly me because I hold in low regard smug skeptics who strut around with the phrase "critical thinking" when it is either empty of content or filled with naïve beliefs about how to analyze ideas. He's grouping me with something he knows we share a dislike of.


Thanks, EA. Appreciate the information.

Didn't realize that Dr. Darby and Stak were one in the same. Haven't been around much lately.

Rereading the good Dr's. posts on this thread, it makes sense though, I guess (all except for the gratuitous DCP graphic, that is).

Have a good evening.
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."

DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
_Yahoo Bot
_Emeritus
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo

Post by _Yahoo Bot »

DrW wrote:
Actually, I'm a pretty innocuous individual in real life. I get along well with my colleagues, keep pretty much to myself, and don't say much unless asked. I try to stay away from parties, class reunions, and all but patent attorneys, whenever possible.



Like I said.
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo

Post by _Quasimodo »

Yahoo Bot wrote:
DrW wrote:
Actually, I'm a pretty innocuous individual in real life. I get along well with my colleagues, keep pretty much to myself, and don't say much unless asked. I try to stay away from parties, class reunions, and all but patent attorneys, whenever possible.



Like I said.


Around here, I think Doc does pretty well. I always enjoy reading his posts and I'm sure he is good company at any gathering.

I'm not so sure about you, though. You seem a little mean spirited and egotistical for good conversation.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo

Post by _ludwigm »

Quasimodo wrote:
SteelHead wrote:When did the thread go from archeology to grammar?
... there isn't enough Nephite archeology ...
What? The museum's shelves in SLC are sinking in with them.

[#img] http://img2.indafoto.hu/10/1/57091_6715 ... 67ad_m.jpg[/img]
.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_Dantana
_Emeritus
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:53 pm

Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo

Post by _Dantana »

ludwigm wrote:What? The museum's shelves in Salt Lake City are sinking in with them.


.


I think they confuse skullduggery and skull-diggery.
_canpakes
_Emeritus
Posts: 8541
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:54 am

Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo

Post by _canpakes »

DrDarbyLDS wrote:Image


Good Gawd, we have got to find some better Photoshop jockeys for these folks. Peterson may be a shameless purveyor of invented and disingenuous crap but I don't know if he yet requires being distorted into a Jabba the Hut lookalike...
_Yahoo Bot
_Emeritus
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Thinking clearly about archaeology and the Book of Mormo

Post by _Yahoo Bot »

Quasimodo wrote:[
I'm not so sure about you, though. You seem a little mean spirited and egotistical for good conversation.


Hah Hah. How many true believers are willing to come in here and take all sorts of personal abuse? Probably less than 5.
Post Reply