Peterson worries you're not having enough babies....

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

Peterson worries you're not having enough babies....

Post by _I have a question »

Earlier today, I posted an item about the decision by increasing numbers of women in the West not to have children.

I feel that I can’t leave that topic without a further comment, partly bibliographical:

Demographic shrinkage of the West relative to, say, the Islamic world — and that shrinkage is dramatic — and of the more prosperous and highly educated portion within Western society relative to other classes, will have (is having) economic, political, and social effects far beyond its impact on the specific people who’re deciding not to have children.

I haven’t read systematically on this topic, but George Weigel’s 2006 The Cube and the Cathedral: Europe, America, and Politics without God, Mark Steyn’s 2008 America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It, and Mary Eberstadt’s 2014 How the West Really Lost God: A New Theory of Secularization certainly offer food for thought.

For a distinct discussion of how demographic trends can impact politics, create instability, lead to war, and so forth, see Bare Branches: The Security Implications of Asia’s Surplus Male Population, a 2005 book by my former BYU colleague (and sometimes fellow FairMormon speaker) Valerie M. Hudson and Andrea M. den Boer. They worry that a society in which hundreds of thousands of men simply cannot find wives or begin families is a society that may come to view them as dangerous, and to use them as cannon fodder.

But back to the West:

The replacement rate — that is, the fertility rate per woman required to maintain a stable population — is approximately 2.1 children.

As of 2014, the actual number was 2.01 in the United States, 1.90 in the United Kingdom, 1.61 in Russia, 1.59 in Canada, 1.48 in Spain, 1.43 in Germany, 1.42 in Italy, 1.41 in Greece, and 1.40 in Japan.

By contrast, the number was 2.86 for Pakistan, 2.87 for Egypt, 3.16 for Jordan, 3.92 for the Sudan, 4.09 for Yemen, 5.25 for Nigeria, 5.43 for Afghanistan, and 6.08 for Somalia.

Weak to nonexistent economies, coupled with burgeoning and young populations, are a recipe for instability and even, perhaps, for foreign adventurism. And very comfortable economies that pamper a dwindling population might well offer an irresistible temptation — or an infuriating target for envy and hatred.

Just a cheery thought for a Sabbath afternoon.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterso ... -west.html
“When we are confronted with evidence that challenges our deeply held beliefs we are more likely to reframe the evidence than we are to alter our beliefs. We simply invent new reasons, new justifications, new explanations. Sometimes we ignore the evidence altogether.” (Mathew Syed 'Black Box Thinking')
_mackay11
_Emeritus
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 3:12 pm

Re: Peterson worries you're not having enough babies....

Post by _mackay11 »

I have a question wrote:
I haven’t read systematically on this topic, but...

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterso ... -west.html


"...but... I'm going to give my opinion on it anyway..."

Having seen several blogs and re-shares of other articles from Peterson this seems to be his modus operandi.

His recent DN.com article on the narrative of Zosimus was similar fluff but just enough in there for a family member to get excited and send it as further evidence of the Book of Mormon's authenticity. It's utter nonsense, but Peterson probably knows his audience won't bother reading the original source so posts it anyway.
_palerobber
_Emeritus
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:48 pm

Re: Peterson worries you're not having enough babies....

Post by _palerobber »

[Hudson and den Boer] worry that a society in which hundreds of thousands of men simply cannot find wives or begin families is a society that may come to view them as dangerous, and to use them as cannon fodder.


well, how'd that work out in Territorial Utah, Dan?
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: Peterson worries you're not having enough babies....

Post by _Gadianton »

They worry that a society [Asia] in which hundreds of thousands of men simply cannot find wives or begin families is a society that may come to view them as dangerous,


Isn't this the problem exactly opposite of what these reactionary thinkers are saying?

China's population explodes, they implement a one-child policy, and then everyone wants a boy and...?

They should be grateful that young people are creating sustainable population growth naturally.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

Re: Peterson worries you're not having enough babies....

Post by _I have a question »

More razor-sharp in-depth analysis by Peterson....

I was mocked on at least one message board for pointing this out, but facts are facts: Not having children leads to shrinking populations....

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterso ... urope.html
“When we are confronted with evidence that challenges our deeply held beliefs we are more likely to reframe the evidence than we are to alter our beliefs. We simply invent new reasons, new justifications, new explanations. Sometimes we ignore the evidence altogether.” (Mathew Syed 'Black Box Thinking')
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Peterson worries you're not having enough babies....

Post by _moksha »

Gadianton wrote:
China's population explodes, they implement a one-child policy, and then everyone wants a boy and...?



Conservative Chinese Communists sign on to the LDS Supreme Court amicus brief to help stave off the inevitable....
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Arrakis
_Emeritus
Posts: 1509
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:54 pm

Re: Peterson worries you're not having enough babies....

Post by _Arrakis »

I have a question wrote:More razor-sharp in-depth analysis by Peterson....

I was mocked on at least one message board for pointing this out, but facts are facts: Not having children leads to shrinking populations....

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterso ... urope.html


.....as a followup he'll make an insightful observation and declare the sun is hot.
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: Peterson worries you're not having enough babies....

Post by _Gadianton »

I agree with him, but a shrinking population doesn't lead to men not being able to find wives. However, an explosive population in at least one important instance, China, has resulted in exactly that it seems.

Oh, another way to block men from having wives is to institute polygamy, and have all the wives for the senior leaders.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: Peterson worries you're not having enough babies....

Post by _sock puppet »

I have a question wrote:More razor-sharp in-depth analysis by Peterson....

I was mocked on at least one message board for pointing this out, but facts are facts: Not having children leads to shrinking populations....

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterso ... urope.html

So he is capable of logic after all. It must be that he just guards his "beliefs" as an area off limits to the application of logic.
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

Re: Peterson worries you're not having enough babies....

Post by _I have a question »

It is interesting that Peterson's point that a shrinking population needs to get cracking in the bedroom mirrors exactly the exhortations of his a Church leaders for members to get married as quickly as possible so they can have lots of babies.

Peterson is highlighting another signpost that Mormonisms population is shrinking.
Facts are facts, right Dan?
“When we are confronted with evidence that challenges our deeply held beliefs we are more likely to reframe the evidence than we are to alter our beliefs. We simply invent new reasons, new justifications, new explanations. Sometimes we ignore the evidence altogether.” (Mathew Syed 'Black Box Thinking')
Post Reply