On Going Inactive

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Symmachus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1520
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: On Going Inactive

Post by _Symmachus »

harmony wrote:I'm not sure church members really know how to be friends. They're pretty good at being home teachers or visiting teachers, but friends? Not so much.


The Church context is what complicates it. I think it's a bit unfair to say that Mormons don't know how to form and maintain friendships. I have several friends who are Mormon but our social interaction was never rooted in common Church activity. When it is so rooted, it means that the social relationship between two people has followed a certain script. It's hard for people to know what to do when the other party to that relationship is not following the script. Being Mormon is an unpaid job, so it's like trying to maintain a friendship with a former co-worker with whom you were friendly, but not friends.
"As to any slivers of light or any particles of darkness of the past, we forget about them."

—B. Redd McConkie
_malkie
_Emeritus
Posts: 2663
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:03 pm

Re: On Going Inactive

Post by _malkie »

consiglieri wrote:The last time my wife and I attended church was the first week of July, 2014.

It has been almost a year and a half now.

Attending church had become too much of a spiritual ordeal for both of us, so we took the opportunity of our youngest leaving home to cease attending.

I have been surprised as to how silently we have been allowed to sink beneath the surface, leaving hardly a ripple behind.

The first time anybody from church contacted us was in a Christmas card last year from the wife of a former bishop, who wrote one line, "Where are you guys?"

The next time was a visit we had in March of this year, when the bishop dropped by with one of his counselors. Our bishop is a nice guy, and explained that the purpose of his visit was to ensure that we were still willing to pay the bill for the mission our youngest is planning.

For the first several months after we stopped attending, I remember checking my cell phone Saturday afternoon and again Sunday morning to see if anybody from church had contacted me wanting me to do something, or just to say hello.

Always the result was the same. No phone calls. No messages.

It isn't like I necessarily want people from church to be contacting me, or that I think it would make any difference in my decision to stop attending.

But I am surprised that, after 25-years in the same stake (and 20-years for my wife), being very active, holding many callings, there is so little in the way of outreach from those I knew and thought were my friends.

It has been a learning experience.

All the Best!

--Consiglieri

I had a very similar experience several years ago when I went from being one of the most active members of the ward to totally inactive over a period of a couple of months. Like you, Consig, I wasn't looking for any contact - just a bit surprised that there hadn't been any. As exec sec I'd followed up on some active-to-inactive members, and could not understand why anyone would drop out of activity.

After about a year or two the HPGL spoke to me after a ward social (I occasionally attended socials back then). He said that he had become concerned that I wasn't active. He continued: "You're the only High Priest that has become inactive while I've been group leader, and it doesn't look good for me that you've dropped out."

Needless to say I almost laughed in his face. He's a nice guy, but really, ...

But at least he was honest about it, and I really appreciated that.
NOMinal member

Maksutov: "... if you give someone else the means to always push your buttons, you're lost."
_cafe crema
_Emeritus
Posts: 2042
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:07 am

Re: On Going Inactive

Post by _cafe crema »

Symmachus wrote:
harmony wrote:I'm not sure church members really know how to be friends. They're pretty good at being home teachers or visiting teachers, but friends? Not so much.
Being Mormon is an unpaid job, so it's like trying to maintain a friendship with a former co-worker with whom you were friendly, but not friends.


But people generally understand that the co-worker you were friendly with was not a friend but rather an acquaintance you were on okay terms with, in the church I think the distinction is blurred, after all you are not just friends you are brothers, and sisters in the gospel, members of the same church family.
_Symmachus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1520
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: On Going Inactive

Post by _Symmachus »

café crema wrote:But people generally understand that the co-worker you were friendly with was not a friend but rather an acquaintance you were on okay terms with, in the church I think the distinction is blurred, after all you are not just friends you are brothers, and sisters in the gospel, members of the same church family.


I certainly agree that that is the perception. I just think the social structure of church-life is what creates this alienation, not a pathological limit to Mormons' capability to form friendships. The gap between what Mormons tell themselves and others about the social structure of their church-life and the reality of how that social structure actually functions may be a large one, but that is a different thing from saying that Mormons don't "really know how to be friends." The thing is that, despite the rhetoric, church-based relationships are not usually friendships in the way that that word is commonly used. Given a choice between faulting human beings as a class for not living up to their rhetoric and faulting rhetoric, I am more inclined to fault rhetoric.
"As to any slivers of light or any particles of darkness of the past, we forget about them."

—B. Redd McConkie
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: On Going Inactive

Post by _Maksutov »

Symmachus wrote:
café crema wrote:But people generally understand that the co-worker you were friendly with was not a friend but rather an acquaintance you were on okay terms with, in the church I think the distinction is blurred, after all you are not just friends you are brothers, and sisters in the gospel, members of the same church family.


I certainly agree that that is the perception. I just think the social structure of church-life is what creates this alienation, not a pathological limit to Mormons' capability to form friendships. The gap between what Mormons tell themselves and others about the social structure of their church-life and the reality of how that social structure actually functions may be a large one, but that is a different thing from saying that Mormons don't "really know how to be friends." The thing is that, despite the rhetoric, church-based relationships are not usually friendships in the way that that word is commonly used. Given a choice between faulting human beings as a class for not living up to their rhetoric and faulting rhetoric, I am more inclined to fault rhetoric.


I think Mormons are like most people with strong group identities. To outsiders they may seem to unduly favor and emphasize the group, to restrict their loyalty, roles, activities and concepts to it, etc. It can give the impression that the group is a third party in every relationship. I have seen it with churches, corporations and other employers, hobbyists, followers of sports teams, political parties, ethnic activist groups.
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_Chuck Finley
_Emeritus
Posts: 259
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:07 pm

Re: On Going Inactive

Post by _Chuck Finley »

harmony wrote:I'm not sure church members really know how to be friends. They're pretty good at being home teachers or visiting teachers, but friends? Not so much.

Such exaggeration doesn't help anyone. I have several fine TBM friends. Yes, friends in the normal sense of the word.
Proud to be the first of the "February Four" expelled from the Ceebooist branch of NeverMormonism.
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: On Going Inactive

Post by _RockSlider »

Don't feel bad Consig. Maybe it's a Utah thing, but having been through several "ward boundary changes" over the years, the guy across the street whom you were tight ward family with for years all of a sudden changes to a new ward family and you never see/talk to them again. Our lives as Mormons are so involved with these ward families there just is not any time/thought left for those split out by change.
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: On Going Inactive

Post by _ludwigm »

RockSlider wrote:Don't feel bad Consig. Maybe it's a Utah thing, but having been through several "ward boundary changes" over the years, the guy across the street whom you were tight ward family with for years all of a sudden changes to a new ward family and you never see/talk to them again. Our lives as Mormons are so involved with these ward families there just is not any time/thought left for those split out by change.

"ward boundary changes"

What?

Members of any christian church can/may appear in any community of the same section (khm.. khm..) of the same orientation (khm.. khm..) or being to be a tourist. They are welcomed there. As all the atheists and/or outsiders.

***Or in a different section. Orientation. Whatever.
In Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox temples there are no bar-coded entry cards. This is speshul Mormon feature...

-------------------------
***
During my work at Siemens, I was always a tourist after official hours, outside.
In Munich, I've sit down in a temple (Evangelic? Protestant? It was a beautiful building.)
There was something ritual. All people have candles before.
I've sat to listen the liturgy.
An old lady has come to me, and lit a candle for me.

I've thanked her.

I am an atheist.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_consiglieri
_Emeritus
Posts: 6186
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:47 pm

Re: On Going Inactive

Post by _consiglieri »

Earlier this month, my wife got a call from a sister in the ward announcing she is my wife's new visiting teacher, and asking if she could come over and visit.

This is a lady my wife has "known" for years but has never said a single word to her at church or otherwise.

My wife told this sister that she is welcome to come to the house to visit, but that my wife didn't really want to talk about church stuff.

The sister expressed mild surprise over this.

My wife told the sister she must be aware that we haven't been to church for a year and a half.

The sister said she was not aware of this.

My wife expressed mild surprise over this . . .
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: On Going Inactive

Post by _RockSlider »

ludwigm wrote:"ward boundary changes"

What?

Members of any christian church can/may appear in any community of the same section (khm.. khm..) of the same orientation (khm.. khm..) or being to be a tourist. They are welcomed there. As all the atheists and/or outsiders.

***Or in a different section. Orientation. Whatever.
In Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox temples there are no bar-coded entry cards. This is speshul Mormon feature...

-------------------------
***
During my work at Siemens, I was always a tourist after official hours, outside.
In Munich, I've sit down in a temple (Evangelic? Protestant? It was a beautiful building.)
There was something ritual. All people have candles before.
I've sat to listen the liturgy.
An old lady has come to me, and lit a candle for me.

I've thanked her.

I am an atheist.



Yes its a very strange phenomenon. The small mountain town of 11,362 people, maybe 5 miles square 2 stakes with 16 wards listed on the internet at this time. Ward boundaries are typically set/adjusted by the number of various groups of people, with emphasis on number of elders/HP's.

I live in an older neighborhood where for years we had what was referred to as a "newly web or nearly dead" wards. Few children/youth lots of old folks and young kids (rental prices on old homes).

And its so true how many year ties of closeness result in bumping into old friends in the store from time to time, simply from a boundary change, where here it is literally splitting neighbors from across the street .... I live on a corner so have gotten double duty over the years.
Post Reply