Dr. Shades's Grammar Lesson of the Day

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Dr. Shades's Grammar Lesson of the Day

Post by _Res Ipsa »

Ceeboo wrote:And another one that pisses me off - the semi-colon!

;

Yeah - that freaking thing!
I never know when to use it!

I think it should be cast to outer darkness for all eternity!


Peace,
Ceeboo


Using a semi-colon is easy; it joins two independent clauses. In other words, it joins two sentences that would be complete if written separately. It ties the two together more closely than if you used periods, and it gives them equal importance. http://theoatmeal.com/comics/semicolon
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_Ceeboo
_Emeritus
Posts: 7625
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Dr. Shades's Grammar Lesson of the Day

Post by _Ceeboo »

Another one:

Does the punctuation mark belong inside or outside of quotation marks?

When I asked him, he screamed "no!" (Inside yes?)
_Ceeboo
_Emeritus
Posts: 7625
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Dr. Shades's Grammar Lesson of the Day

Post by _Ceeboo »

Hey Res Ipsa! :smile:

Res Ipsa wrote:
Ceeboo wrote:And another one that pisses me off - the semi-colon!

;

Yeah - that freaking thing!
I never know when to use it!

I think it should be cast to outer darkness for all eternity!


Peace,
Ceeboo


Using a semi-colon is easy; it joins two independent clauses. In other words, it joins two sentences that would be complete if written separately. It ties the two together more closely than if you used periods, and it gives them equal importance. http://theoatmeal.com/comics/semicolon


Thanks for the link!

I think I will give it a go!


Ceeboo hates semi-colons; he thinks they should be abolished forever!

Good? Or not so much? :smile:

Peace,
Ceeboo
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Dr. Shades's Grammar Lesson of the Day

Post by _Res Ipsa »

I love semi-colons! I used to include one in every brief I wrote just in case the judge was a grammar nerd. After reading pages and pages of stultifying briefs, I could imagine it might brighten the day of a grammar nerd judge to see a properly used semi-colon.
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

Re: Dr. Shades's Grammar Lesson of the Day

Post by _I have a question »

Res Ipsa wrote:I love semi-colons! I used to include one in every brief I wrote just in case the judge was a grammar nerd. After reading pages and pages of stultifying briefs, I could imagine it might brighten the day of a grammar nerd judge to see a properly used semi-colon.


Can one get a semi-colonic irrigation?
“When we are confronted with evidence that challenges our deeply held beliefs we are more likely to reframe the evidence than we are to alter our beliefs. We simply invent new reasons, new justifications, new explanations. Sometimes we ignore the evidence altogether.” (Mathew Syed 'Black Box Thinking')
_Ceeboo
_Emeritus
Posts: 7625
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Dr. Shades's Grammar Lesson of the Day

Post by _Ceeboo »

Res Ipsa wrote:I love semi-colons!




Image
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Dr. Shades's Grammar Lesson of the Day

Post by _Res Ipsa »

Ceeboo wrote:
Res Ipsa wrote:I love semi-colons!




Image


I love that gif; it is soooooo snarky!
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Dr. Shades's Grammar Lesson of the Day

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Tator wrote:nitpick
nit pick
nit-pick

I want to know which word is correct!

Nitpick.

When in doubt, type the variations into merriam-webster.com:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nitpick

Markk wrote:Do you put your peas in a row before you eat them? :)

No.

We all spend 12 years learning to write correctly, so there isn't any excuse not to do so.

Ceeboo wrote:When you use all capital letters for a word, does it change the meaning of that particular word?

BIGOT?
LIAR?
IGNORANT?
STUPID?

No.

A word or phrase in all capital letters is merely an Internet-age shorthand version of boldfacing.

Ceeboo wrote:When you use an apostrophe s for a word that ends in a "s" - what is the correct way to write that?

I am asking because the OP title of this thread ("Shades's") looks odd to me - probably right though, eh?

So let's take a word that ends in a "s"

Jesus

How would you write a possession of Jesus?

Jesus's robe? (That looks wrong - but probably correct?)

What about the plural of Jesus?

There are seven Jesus's in our class (That can't be right because it's the same as the possession - yes/no?)

The more I think about this - the more confused I am getting :lol:

Because the possession of church is "church's" yes?

It is the church's tree?

But for the plural it becomes churches - right?
We add "es"

HELP!!!!!!!!!

The answer to your inquiries is in Lesson #3.

Ceeboo wrote:And another one that pisses me off - the semi-colon!

;

Yeah - that freaking thing!
I never know when to use it!

I think it should be cast to outer darkness for all eternity!

You should know exactly when to use it, 'cause I gave you Lesson #21 at your own requests, which you made here and here.

Ceeboo wrote:Does the punctuation mark belong inside or outside of quotation marks?

When I asked him, he screamed "no!" (Inside yes?)

Inside (which is rather counter-intuitive).
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Ceeboo
_Emeritus
Posts: 7625
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Dr. Shades's Grammar Lesson of the Day

Post by _Ceeboo »

Dr. Shades wrote:You should know exactly when to use it, 'cause I gave you Lesson #21 at your own requests, which you made here and here


Thank you my good man! :smile:

(Even though, apparently, I had asked this very question before!)


Peace,
Ceeboo
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Dr. Shades's Grammar Lesson of the Day

Post by _Dr. Shades »

GRAMMAR LESSON #24: Hard returns

Please take a look at the following post:

I don't hope to gain anything.

I just think this entire thread is a little bit more interesting than reading about the cement on Night Lion's front porch.
Not much more interesting....A little bit more interesting.


Peace,
Ceeboo

With the old manual typewriters, it was customary to press the Tab key at the beginning of each new paragraph. This is still true of fiction books. With the advent of typing text into fields within web pages, there is no quick convention for indenting a new paragraph (due to the fact that the Tab key causes the cursor to leave the field and activate the next input device, like a button or hyperlink). Therefore, it's customary to put an extra, empty line between two paragraphs.

To make this happen, the "Enter" key must be pressed twice. The problem is, some people become confused and mistakenly think that a hard return must be placed at the end of every sentence (in other words, they mistakenly think the "Enter" key must be pressed once) when in reality it must not be pressed at all. At the end of a paragraph, two hard returns must be made (in other words, the "Enter" key must be pressed twice).

For some reason, the "two" gets lost in translation, and people mistakenly feel the need to add lots of extra white space by pressing the "Enter" key three or more times. This must not be done.

With those two points in mind, these are the mistakes in the above-quoted post:

I don't hope to gain anything.

I just think this entire thread is a little bit more interesting than reading about the cement on Night Lion's front porch. <---Mistaken single hard return
Not much more interesting....A little bit more interesting.

<---Mistaken triple hard return
Peace,<---We can forgive this single hard return since it's a closing salutation
Ceeboo

Now that we all know better, here is how it should've been formatted:

I don't hope to gain anything.

I just think this entire thread is a little bit more interesting than reading about the cement on Night Lion's front porch. Not much more interesting....A little bit more interesting.

Peace,
Ceeboo

See how much easier that is to read? How much better it "flows?"

In summary, RULE OF THUMB (or of right little finger): You may press the "Enter" key twice, but only at the end of a WHOLE PARAGRAPH. You may never press the enter key once, three times, four times, etc. If your right little finger ever hovers over the "Enter" key, it may only depress the key TWO times AND NO OTHER NUMBER OF TIMES (except within a closing salutation, in which case one time is forgivable, but it's much better to skip the closing salutation on the Internet since everyone can see your username and avatar anyway).

Now go thou and sin no more.

(To the person reading this who is about to post a reply that contains repeated violations of this rule: Just don't do it. Stop yourself. The joke is older than the hills. You are neither cute nor funny.)
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
Post Reply