Gunnar wrote:Stop being obtuse! You know that what I meant is that the claims I made didn't originate with me. They are the claims of scientists far more knowledgeable than either you or I.
And now you are back to the fallacious argumentum ad verecundiam or Argument from authority. You really are a damned retard.
Gunnar wrote:Again, you are being deliberately obtuse. The fact that we can't predict or prevent some incredibly huge catastrophe that might or might not possibly occur sometime in the indefinite future does not justify refusing to work on solving problems here and now that we know we can do something about.
You can't do anything about how much gas I burn or how much energy someone in China uses either. Religious nuts like you think you have some control over the world. News flash!!! You don't.
Gunnar wrote:Yet more obtuseness and irrelevancy.
And yet you pretend to be so concerned about CO2 emissions. I can't wait for you religious nuts to propose the giant plug for mega-eruptions.
Gunnar wrote:Nonsense! Improving efficiency and reducing waste is always a good idea, no matter what. And you didn't even try to look at and consider the links to Amory Lovins' ideas. What he said completely blew your arguments to smithereens, which is why you are afraid to look at them.
Of course you would say that. You don't understand economics or have any sense in your head. It also explains why you are a religious nutjob.
"You lack vision, but I see a place where people get on and off the freeway. On and off, off and on all day, all night.... Tire salons, automobile dealerships and wonderful, wonderful billboards reaching as far as the eye can see. My God, it'll be beautiful." -- Judge Doom