Who is worse in your eyes?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Jesse Pinkman
_Emeritus
Posts: 2693
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 1:58 am

Re: Who is worse in your eyes?

Post by _Jesse Pinkman »

honorentheos wrote:Brigham. Hands down. MMM was, if not by his direct command, the fruit of his spiritual leadership. There is a lot of innocent blood on that man's hands.

Amen.
So you're chasing around a fly and in your world, I'm the idiot?

"Friends don't let friends be Mormon." Sock Puppet, MDB.

Music is my drug of choice.

"And that is precisely why none of us apologize for holding it to the celestial standard it pretends that it possesses." Kerry, MDB
_________________
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: Who is worse in your eyes?

Post by _MsJack »

100 - 140 innocent people were murdered by Young's lieutenants under his watch and he did nothing to bring the perpetrators to justice---even said that it was God taking vengeance. Nothing Joseph Smith did compares.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_Dr Exiled
_Emeritus
Posts: 3616
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 3:48 am

Re: Who is worse in your eyes?

Post by _Dr Exiled »

I'd have to say BY over Joseph Smith too because of the Mountain Meadows Massacre. He also caused to be killed several innocents during the prior Mormon reformation hysteria.

Joseph Smith certainly had mass murder in mind when he requested from Congress 100,000 or so troops to be put under his control prior to his murder in 1844. However, Joseph Smith didn't get the troops, was killed too early in his career, and never had the chance to be a mass murderer like bloody brigham.
"Religion is about providing human community in the guise of solving problems that don’t exist or failing to solve problems that do and seeking to reconcile these contradictions and conceal the failures in bogus explanations otherwise known as theology." - Kishkumen 
_grindael
_Emeritus
Posts: 6791
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:15 am

Re: Who is worse in your eyes?

Post by _grindael »

Two peas in a pod. Young was the natural progression of Smith. He, in essence, became Smith in Utah.
Riding on a speeding train; trapped inside a revolving door;
Lost in the riddle of a quatrain; Stuck in an elevator between floors.
One focal point in a random world can change your direction:
One step where events converge may alter your perception.
_grindael
_Emeritus
Posts: 6791
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:15 am

Re: Who is worse in your eyes?

Post by _grindael »

MsJack wrote:100 - 140 innocent people were murdered by Young's lieutenants under his watch and he did nothing to bring the perpetrators to justice---even said that it was God taking vengeance. Nothing Joseph Smith did compares.



Smith got every one of those men and women and children killed at Haun's Mills. Just as despicable. Then, he blamed them for NOT "listening to counsel". I kid you not.
Riding on a speeding train; trapped inside a revolving door;
Lost in the riddle of a quatrain; Stuck in an elevator between floors.
One focal point in a random world can change your direction:
One step where events converge may alter your perception.
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: Who is worse in your eyes?

Post by _MsJack »

grindael wrote:Smith got every one of those men and women and children killed at Haun's Mills. Just as despicable. Then, he blamed them for NOT "listening to counsel". I kid you not.

Even if you can lay Haun's Mill at Smith's feet (I wouldn't), the death count at MMM was still five times higher.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: Who is worse in your eyes?

Post by _sock puppet »

MsJack wrote:
grindael wrote:Smith got every one of those men and women and children killed at Haun's Mills. Just as despicable. Then, he blamed them for NOT "listening to counsel". I kid you not.

Even if you can lay Haun's Mill at Smith's feet (I wouldn't), the death count at MMM was still five times higher.

The death count is certainly an important factor in the comparison. JSJr started the mischief, and for that he gets extra points towards the comparison in my book. BY was certainly more inconoclastic, used the vehicle that JSJr created to feather his (Brigham's) own bed, and seems much less compassionate towards others. But in the end, I count them both as sociopaths.
_honorentheos
_Emeritus
Posts: 11104
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:17 am

Re: Who is worse in your eyes?

Post by _honorentheos »

MsJack wrote:
grindael wrote:Smith got every one of those men and women and children killed at Haun's Mills. Just as despicable. Then, he blamed them for NOT "listening to counsel". I kid you not.

Even if you can lay Haun's Mill at Smith's feet (I wouldn't), the death count at MMM was still five times higher.

I'm with you on this.

There is a certain ethical similarity between Joseph's rhetoric, the purpose of Zion's Camp, and the Mormon War in Missouri to the Utah War and Brigham's fortress Zion. But in Smith's case there was mutual hostile action and a lot of Mormon women and children died of exposure due no more to Smith's actions than have ever died because they believed the words of some authority that was hated by others. Had Rigdon not given his infamous speech, would so many have died? Or had George Albert not ridden through Southern Utah, would the MMM been avoided? I don't know. But I don't see as direct a line between Smith's actions and the deaths that followed without so many others on both sides being given over to their most base instincts. And that being said knowing some of my own ancestors and their children died of exposure having been ran out of their house in the dead of winter at night.

Evil is not a word I use lightly. What happened at Mountain Meadows seems only possible when the worst of human behavior is magnified through the leadership of a vile and depraved mind, and people feel they no longer are responsible for their own actions giving license to cross lines unimaginable. MMM meets my criteria for being evil. And Young bears the lions share of responsibility for it and full responsibility for the cover-up that followed as you pointed out earlier.
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth?
~ Eiji Yoshikawa
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: Who is worse in your eyes?

Post by _DarkHelmet »

Tough call. It's like picking between L. Ron Hubbard and David Miscavige. In both Mormonism and Scientology the founders were charismatic con-men who somehow built a loyal following based on bizarre beliefs, and when they died it left a power vacuum in the organization that was seized by opportunistic tyrants. In both cases I believe the tyrants are/were more evil than the founders.
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
_Sanctorian
_Emeritus
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:14 pm

Re: Who is worse in your eyes?

Post by _Sanctorian »

Jesse Pinkman wrote:Who do you find more dispicable? Joseph Smith or Brigham Young?


Definitely Brigham but only because he helped the church survive. Had he not made it as far west as SLC, the church likely would have died off or stayed small to the level of RLDS. I think it's despicable he could walk that goddam far.
I'm a Ziontologist. I self identify as such.
Post Reply