Amore wrote:Thanks, Jo. :)
I like that you mentioned about our first estate - and the difference between believing something and knowing from experience.
I believe that Joseph Smith did get a glimpse of a more universal reality, but I think that many others have had that too. And I think that Joseph Smith, as well as others who had revelations, were not perfect, and allowed their subjective ideas to influence their interpretations and teachings.
IE: Joseph Smith went along with the idea of Jesus as human sacrifice scapegoat (a lie that the "universal" church had placed in canon). He based much of his ideas on this lie, yet some of his ideas were inspired - and good and helped many see and do better. Still, he played along with the Satanic lie that Jesus must have the glory - that we should worship Jesus over God, that God is mean and requires Jesus to be killed for the mistakes God created us to make.
Ultimately, it reminds me to not trust in the flesh - not even prophets who wrote (& others who warped & edited) scriptures.
Thank you, Amore!
This is where I now am when considering scripture and religion in general. It is a part of my own personal journey. No one needs to agree with me....and no one needs to believe it.
Christ didn't want us to trust in the flesh either....though He also did not interfere with their free will desire to cling to religion. He taught from the perspective of their already-established beliefs...trying to get them to live it more kindly. This, even though their beliefs couldn't possibly cause them to treat each other with equality.
It is religion which even teaches that there IS a "God"---and that by entreating "God", that "God" will then treat people unequally by giving those who entreat Him more abundantly. However, "God" is not a respecter of persons...all are alike unto "God". The sun shines on everyone....the rain falls on everyone. In the Book of Mormon we can see how Christ did the same thing as Moses (Moses gave the people religion after they refused to meet with the Lord on their own). After Christ taught the people the same things He had taught the Jews (the same words taught in the Sermon on the Mount), He asked the Nephites to go home and ponder the things He had taught. But the people didn't want to go home and ponder them. They hung around looking for more than His simple message. That is when He groaned within....their "wickedness" was to get more from Him. In order to follow the universal code of free will, Christ went ahead and gave them religion. The religious will always "see" and "hear" this as a confirmation that "God" loves them more, thinks that they are special, are chosen, etc., above others. Also, in accordance with free will, Christ and other TM's simply will not come right out and say that religion is "wrong"---they will, however, warn about what their religious beliefs are doing to their ability to figure out what is going on here. Ultimately, the religious concept that some are better than others (which is also a basic tenet of other belief systems as well....not just religion) is causing most of the world's suffering (which goes way beyond the suffering of natural events and circumstances). John's Revelation tries to teach what this looks like.
Joseph also gave the people religion. Even though he now KNEW the real truth, he gave the people the religion they desired. They had already rejected the simple gospel message. Because they read the Book of Mormon through the eyes and ears of religion (they already believed in the "God" of religion...so that is all they were able to see and hear), they missed this second chance to "see" and "hear" and come unto the "Lord" (to finally give up religion and just do the simple message of doing unto others what they would have others do unto them).
While we are all capable of receiving "revelation" (i.e., tap into the connection between our higher self and our mortal self), the TYPE of "revelation" received by Joseph on behalf of the people was ALL in accordance with their free will desires. We can even see that Joseph "receives" revelation AFTER the people ask him questions. He wasn't giving the people revelations from "God"! He was making up revelation according to what they wanted. This is very different from being connected to any higher self. His revelations weren't "inspired"...they were made up (though there are some hints and clues he tried to mix in---that is where we will get the idea that they were inspired---because of the truth he included). There is a major irony inside of D&C 84 (Remember, as a revelation being received on behalf of the Church, this also was made up by Joseph...he didn't need to go to the Lord about this matter. Joseph already KNEW the real truth. Giving the people the desires of their hearts was something he was mandated to do.) ....after the "Lord" tells the people that they are under condemnation for being in a state of unbelief (In other words, rejecting---not believing---once again the simple gospel message and DOING what He taught), Joseph IMMEDIATELY gives the people religion. This was exactly what Christ had done with the Nephites. Just like with the Nephites, the people grabbed onto the religion aspect of that D&C section....believing that this was proof that "God" favored them above others. There was zero real power and authority being given to the people on the earth...not EVER. If "God" WERE to give to some and not to others, this would cause "God" to change...He would no longer be a non-respecter of persons. All would no longer be alike unto "God". He would cease to be "God".