94,044,000 Americans Not in the Labor Force
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 6914
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:56 am
Re: 94,044,000 Americans Not in the Labor Force
This statistic was plenty disturbing as well. 1/6 men ages 25-54 are not working.
http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front ... men-wessel
In one out of five American families, nobody has a job.
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/arch ... -has-a-job
http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front ... men-wessel
In one out of five American families, nobody has a job.
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/arch ... -has-a-job
And when the confederates saw Jackson standing fearless as a stone wall the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 15602
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm
Re: 94,044,000 Americans Not in the Labor Force
What... ajax not answering another direct question? The devil, you say?!
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13037
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm
Re: 94,044,000 Americans Not in the Labor Force
ajax18 wrote:This statistic was plenty disturbing as well. 1/6 men ages 25-54 are not working.
http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front ... men-wessel
In one out of five American families, nobody has a job.
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/arch ... -has-a-job
And how many of those "families" are simply retired couples living off their retirement? Baby boomers are retiring in record numbers and there are 60 million folks on Social Security alone now. Your source says there are 16 million families without anyone employed, which isn't surprising. All you're doing is spinning the same data in a different way to ignore the obvious. There is nothing to be "disturbed" about here.
Here is the part where you ignore the facts for a millionth time and then come back with another Brietfart piece talking about the same crap.
Last edited by YahooSeeker [Bot] on Wed May 11, 2016 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13426
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm
Re: 94,044,000 Americans Not in the Labor Force
Some Schmo wrote:What... ajax not answering another direct question? The devil, you say?!
It's why no one really takes him seriously.
42
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9070
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm
Re: 94,044,000 Americans Not in the Labor Force
Themis wrote:Some Schmo wrote:What... ajax not answering another direct question? The devil, you say?!
It's why no one really takes him seriously.
It's times like this I begin to believe he's simply trolling us.
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:12 am
Re: 94,044,000 Americans Not in the Labor Force
I decided to bump this thread back up after Ajax/"Maxine" recently stated here:
"Make sure to get out the vote in 2020 so we can fundamentally transform this country from a working economy with a high labor participation rate back to a pick your check up in the mail welfare collecting economy." - Link
But there are still over 95,000,000 Americans not in the labor force, and the labor participation rate is just slightly higher it is now than when President Obama left office.
2016:
Nov. 62.7%
Dec. 62.7%
2018:
Nov. 63.2%
Dec. 63.2%
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
There was a good article about this subject on CNN.com from a couple of years ago.
https://money.cnn.com/2018/01/10/news/e ... index.html
"Make sure to get out the vote in 2020 so we can fundamentally transform this country from a working economy with a high labor participation rate back to a pick your check up in the mail welfare collecting economy." - Link
But there are still over 95,000,000 Americans not in the labor force, and the labor participation rate is just slightly higher it is now than when President Obama left office.
2016:
Nov. 62.7%
Dec. 62.7%
2018:
Nov. 63.2%
Dec. 63.2%
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
There was a good article about this subject on CNN.com from a couple of years ago.
The number of Americans out of the workforce is misleading as a gauge of who is and isn't working.
For example, retired people are out of the workforce. They're not counted in the unemployment rate because they don't want a job. The same is true of tens of millions of Americans who are in school, or can't work because they are disabled.
https://money.cnn.com/2018/01/10/news/e ... index.html
"And I've said it before, you want to know what Joseph Smith looked like in Nauvoo, just look at Trump." - Fence Sitter
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:01 pm
Re: 94,044,000 Americans Not in the Labor Force
So there are more Americans not working now than there were under Obama.
"One of the hardest things for me to accept is the fact that Kevin Graham has blonde hair, blue eyes and an English last name. This ugly truth blows any arguments one might have for actual white supremacism out of the water. He's truly a disgrace." - Ajax
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:12 am
Re: 94,044,000 Americans Not in the Labor Force
Icarus wrote:So there are more Americans not working now than there were under Obama.
There are slightly more Americans out of the labor force now than when Obama left office.
December of 2016: 95,031,000
December of 2019: 95,625,000
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS15000000
"And I've said it before, you want to know what Joseph Smith looked like in Nauvoo, just look at Trump." - Fence Sitter
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11104
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:17 am
Re: 94,044,000 Americans Not in the Labor Force
That number is going to keep growing as more baby boomers move into retirement. But as I noted to Ajax in the other thread, there is an increase in the percentage of people over retirement age in the work force compared to previous generations as well. More and more people are working into their mid 70s. This corresponds with a lower percentage of people under 24 and even in the prime employment years from 25 through 55 when compared to pre-recession numbers. Big picture, the economy looks different from 2008-10 onward compared to before 2008. The period between 2008 and 2010 included high unemployment but typical labor participation demographics. But they shifted in that period to lower overall participation, and changes in the participation by age category.
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth?
~ Eiji Yoshikawa
~ Eiji Yoshikawa
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 22508
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm
Re: 94,044,000 Americans Not in the Labor Force
Boomer increases make up for a decrease in kids. By 2050 most of the boomers will have died out. Many areas of the world will have vastly decreased populations due to climate change. A number of affluent Republicans will have moved to Galt Island, which they will have renamed Shangrila. Fights will still break out over who owns the breathable atmosphere on the island.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace