Black Mob viciously beats Trump voter

[_The CCC]

I know you think your racism is justified, Majax. That's one of your biggest character flaws.

I didn't read the story because it's from Infowars, and I try to avoid filling my head with crap. I wasn't talking about the story criticizing African Americans, I was talking about you.

Unfortunately the election of Trump has allowed Majax to bring out his white sheet.

[_Some Schmo]

Unfortunately the election of Trump has allowed Majax to bring out his white sheet.

What I'd like to know is why he has one. Was he swaddled as an infant in white sheets with eye holes, or did he pick this crap up in the backwoods of WV? Given the WV Mayor who just resigned over her support of a grossly racist comment she endorsed, it might be a depressing combination of both.

[_The CCC]

I don't believe people are born racist. Family and culture are probably the main causes.
SEE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkpUyB2xgTM

[_Some Schmo]

I don't believe people are born racist. Family and culture are probably the main causes.
SEE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkpUyB2xgTM

I understand that, CCC. When I said "swaddled in white sheets with eye holes" I was referring to his family's influence.

[_Jersey Girl]

Sorry - are your posts on this board being censored in some way?

Jersey Girl is saying that this thread should be put in the spirit prison because the title is "racist." If it's racist to post the fact that a mob of 5 or 6 black people beat up a white motorist while saying, "He voted for Trump," then I'm asking would it be racist to post a story where a mob of 5 or 6 white people beat up a black motorist saying, "He voted for Hillary?"

I watched the video in question. There is zero information provided to suggest that the assault was race based. If that were a group of Caucasians assaulting another Caucasian, would you have bothered to note that those who assaulted were white?

That's why your post and OP are racist. You see skin color and you automatically assume that the event was race based. For all you know, before someone started the video, the driver of the car provoked those who assaulted him. You also mistakenly believe that the people who assaulted him didn't hold a strong political opinion in terms of Hillary vs Trump, like the crowds of Caucasians who are also protesting our streets.

You see a man being assaulted by a small group of angry people and your only consideration is the color of their skin.

[_Jersey Girl]

I disagree with Jersey Girl and her nannying. She's prone to that even though she's a major crap stirrer herself.

Regardless of your views, I think the ability to express them and to have a dialogue about them take supremacy over feelings.

- Doc

Shades told me to voice my opinion on the post without simply telling the poster to shut up. That's exactly what I did.

Why is that board nannying? Are all of us, including yourself, who identified faqs as a racist all board nannies? There's a reason faqs is restricted to the new Prison forum and it's not just because he spams the board. His posts have blatant racist overtones and that's one of the reasons that people condemned him. I and others, have told faqs to shut up numerous times and no one objected to that.

I made one post opposing an OP and it's openly confirmed/documented racist author and that's crap stirring?

[_Jersey Girl]

Is this story criticizing these men for being African American? I thought it was criticizing them for dragging a motorist out of his car and beating him while saying, "Hey, he voted for Trump." It's also exploring the reverse racist double standard that exits by posing the question, "How would the mainstream media treat this incident if the tables were turned?"

Did you see or hear anything in the video clip that suggested the attack was racially motivated besides the skin color of the perps and victim? Do you know who started the assault? Do you know what really happened after the assault? No, you don't.

You only know what you see in the small segment of a situation intended to fuel your own racism and it was successful. People who think like you feed off each other and this video was an all you can eat buffet.

Has "He voted for Trump" got anything at all to do with their skin color?

Your problem is that you simply cannot share an account without mentioning race. You don't see men and women, you see their color. Unless you can prove to me that the assault was racially motivated, you've got nothing to base your position on besides your own racism.

If the perps in that video had been white and the driver white, your post would have simply said "gang of thugs drag driver out of car in assault". But if that had been the case, I doubt that you would have thought it reportable at all because the racism is what you're after, not the story.

[_Maxine Waters]

But if that had been the case, I doubt that you would have thought it reportable at all because the racism is what you're after, not the story.

It was about someone being assaulted because the perpetrators had a suspicion he might have voted for Trump.

Maybe someone should have said something about the abuse, bullying, and posting of personal information of ldsfaqs that you engaged in routinely.

[_Chap]

... someone being assaulted because the perpetrators had a suspicion he might have voted for Trump.

Do we know whether that is what actually happened? I don't mean the assault, but the motive for it.

[_Jersey Girl]

But if that had been the case, I doubt that you would have thought it reportable at all because the racism is what you're after, not the story.

It was about someone being assaulted because the perpetrators had a suspicion he might have voted for Trump.

Maybe someone should have said something about the abuse, bullying, and posting of personal information of ldsfaqs that you engaged in routinely.

What personal information of ldsfaqs?