moksha wrote:Denial of who the moderators are at Mormon D&D is covered under the doctrine of "Lying for the Board".

Peace,
Ceeboo
moksha wrote:Denial of who the moderators are at Mormon D&D is covered under the doctrine of "Lying for the Board".
candygal wrote:I had plenty to say...and I am not ashamed..figured I would be banned from the thread..but I have never had posts removed since two days ago. You guys will never know what I said..makes you feel like a piece of crap.
Madison54 wrote:candygal wrote:I had plenty to say...and I am not ashamed..figured I would be banned from the thread..but I have never had posts removed since two days ago. You guys will never know what I said..makes you feel like a piece of crap.
Yeah....there were a huge amount of posts that just disappeared from that thread and other threads over the last few days, They are trying to send a message.
candygal wrote:If the board changes drastically to please Juliann and others, they will need to change a phrase on their home page. "Welcome Come On In"
Madison54 wrote: Maybe what he posted woke her up to how horribly nasty she comes across. But I doubt it.
Right. Not only am I miserable and don't know it, but I must also get someone else to defect in order to validate why I left.JLHPROF wrote:I also think that there is very much a desire to achieve that validation [that critics want for their doubts] by getting others to join them. If they can convince another believing member that the doubt that led them from the Church is correct and cause another member to leave then it in some way would validate their decision. It's not just about validation, it's about validation through sharing doubts.
Or to put it another way, misery loves company even when someone doesn't think they are actually miserable because of the decision to leave.
http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/691 ... ns/?page=8
Lemmie wrote:Here's a post guaranteed to make Juliann happy:Right. Not only am I miserable and don't know it, but I must also get someone else to defect in order to validate why I left.JLHPROF wrote:I also think that there is very much a desire to achieve that validation [that critics want for their doubts] by getting others to join them. If they can convince another believing member that the doubt that led them from the Church is correct and cause another member to leave then it in some way would validate their decision. It's not just about validation, it's about validation through sharing doubts.
Or to put it another way, misery loves company even when someone doesn't think they are actually miserable because of the decision to leave.
http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/691 ... ns/?page=8Whole lot of silly assumptions being made there.
MsJack wrote:Juliann's comeuppance is that her only legacy in life will be "ran a sucky message board."