Yahoo Bot wrote:There isn't enough there. Close, but not enough. First of all, conforming quotes to the Chicago Style Guide is not copying. You have to exclude those. Strings of three or four words or less, unless they are particularly quirky things, are merely "common" knowledge phrases. Certainly not one or two word phrases.
Your longest phrases are these:
(1)In 1964, the Irish physicist John Stewart Bell proved mathematically
(2)In 1972, physicists Stuart Freedman and John F. Clauser published a successful experimental test of Bell’s theorem.
(3)publish the first widely accepted evidence that “spooky action at a distance”
(4)compared quantum theory’s prediction of entangled particles to telepathy.
Really not enough, at least from a copyright infringement standpoint.
I will note that phrase (4) does not appear in Radin's work. Nor does (3) exist although the only difference is quote marks. Nor is (2). Nor is (1). Your analysis is incorrect, at least from a copyright infringement standpoint.
Amen. Thanks for pointing this out.
So you're chasing around a fly and in your world, I'm the idiot?
"Friends don't let friends be Mormon." Sock Puppet, MDB.
Music is my drug of choice.
"And that is precisely why none of us apologize for holding it to the celestial standard it pretends that it possesses." Kerry, MDB _________________
Jesse Pinkman wrote:Amen. Thanks for pointing this out.
What he "pointed out" has been discussed and rebutted for several pages. His analysis does not agree with the facts of what I posted, as was noted several times, nor with the general definition of plagiarism; more specifically, it does not agree with the BYU code of honor, which applies to Peterson. Do you have a new or specific point to make that requires bringing up yahoo bot's refuted points again?
Lemmie wrote: What he "pointed out" has been discussed and rebutted for several pages. His analysis does not agree with the facts of what I posted, as was noted several times, nor with the general definition of plagiarism; more specifically, it does not agree with the BYU code of honor, which applies to Peterson. Do you have a new or specific point to make that requires bringing up yahoo bot's refuted points again?
I had not read the entire thread when I made that particular comment. I hadn't read all of the debate that occurred afterward.
For the record, I just find all the threads about Dan rather tiresome. Plus, Dan is a friend, and I don't enjoy seeing him maligned.
So you're chasing around a fly and in your world, I'm the idiot?
"Friends don't let friends be Mormon." Sock Puppet, MDB.
Music is my drug of choice.
"And that is precisely why none of us apologize for holding it to the celestial standard it pretends that it possesses." Kerry, MDB _________________
Lemmie wrote: What he "pointed out" has been discussed and rebutted for several pages. His analysis does not agree with the facts of what I posted, as was noted several times, nor with the general definition of plagiarism; more specifically, it does not agree with the BYU code of honor, which applies to Peterson. Do you have a new or specific point to make that requires bringing up yahoo bot's refuted points again?
I had not read the entire thread when I made that particular comment. I hadn't read all of the debate that occurred afterward.
For the record, I just find all the threads about Dan rather tiresome. Plus, Dan is a friend, and I don't enjoy seeing him maligned.
Ok. Except that I haven't maligned Peterson, and as far as I recall, no one else in this thread has either.
Malign:
to speak harmful untruths about; speak evil of; slander; defame:
Jesse Pinkman wrote:... and I don't enjoy seeing him maligned.
I think it's more a point of interest rather than an intent to ~malign~ his character. He's been busted multiple times for plagiarism and it's psychologically fascinating to observe the compulsive behavior.
- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Honestly, I'm just tired of threads that consistently focus on Dan here. I understand that he is somewhat considered a public figure, but the man did used to post here. And there just seems to be a very odd obsession about him that exists here.
I'm not saying that you necessarily fall into that category, Lemmie. I've just been on the board a long time and have seen my share of this. That's all.
So you're chasing around a fly and in your world, I'm the idiot?
"Friends don't let friends be Mormon." Sock Puppet, MDB.
Music is my drug of choice.
"And that is precisely why none of us apologize for holding it to the celestial standard it pretends that it possesses." Kerry, MDB _________________
Jesse Pinkman wrote:For the record, I just find all the threads about Dan rather tiresome. Plus, Dan is a friend, and I don't enjoy seeing him maligned.
*sigh* Jesse, your objection is duly noted just like it has been in countless other DCP threads. It's getting tiresome.
Please do us all a favor and stop piping up on every DCP thread and parroting the same objection.
PS If your friend treats you like crap, maybe he's not your friend. Just something to think about.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."
Jesse Pinkman wrote:Seriously, guys. Give it a rest.
Give what a rest?
I think this a code phrase indicating it is time to bring up weight, donuts and WofW.
a.k.a. Pokatatorjoined Oct 26, 2006 and permanently banned from MAD Nov 6, 2006
"Stop being such a damned coward and use your real name to own your position."
"That's what he gets for posting in his own name."
2 different threads same day 2 hours apart Yohoo Bat 12/1/2015