Tidal wave of sexual assault-misconduct allegations list

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Tidal wave of sexual assault-misconduct allegations list

Post by _EAllusion »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/news/yorker-journalist-sacked-over-improper-sexual-conduct-232327330.html

"I am dismayed that The New Yorker has decided to characterize a respectful relationship with a woman I dated as somehow inappropriate," Ryan Lizza was quoted as saying.

"The New Yorker was unable to cite any company policy that was violated."

-------------------------------------------

Hrm.

- Doc


You hope they have him dead to rights if they are going to term. And it's possible since labor law prevents the employer from revealing the basis for termination in detail. They could have damning texts, pm's, vm's, etc. and just not be able to discuss it. I've been the person who had to term someone only to listen to that person publicly mischaracterize why they were fired and have to swallow my tongue while that nonsense went on more than once.

On the other hand, you worry that Ryan Lizza is right and there wasn't a firm basis. It's a shrug of the shoulders at this point.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Tidal wave of sexual assault-misconduct allegations list

Post by _EAllusion »

Jersey Girl wrote:
In 2001, Matt invited the unnamed woman into his office at 30 Rockefeller Plaza. Lauer lured her into the office with claims that they'd be discussing work, however, he then proceeded to lock the door using a button under his desk. Lauer then ordered his peer to unbutton her blouse, a request she complied with.

The broadcaster then moved out from behind his desk, grabbed a chair, pulled down her pants, and bent the colleague over it. He reportedly sexually assaulted her, but the woman fell unconscious at some point during the encounter. The next thing she remembers is waking up on Lauer's office floor, with her pants halfway down her legs. This situation prompted Matt's assistant to take her to a nurse for medical attention


http://perezhilton.com/2017-11-30-matt- ... iM6wYWcGTA


Look at this: Lauer then ordered his peer to unbutton her blouse, a request she complied with.

If I were in Lauer's position, I would have taken that as a "yes". I contend that anyone would have taken that as a "yes".

Women have a responsibility to conduct themselves in such a way as to thwart unwanted advances. Does that help in every single instance of sexual misconduct? Of course not, but it would have helped in this account if it is accurate.

That's not victim blaming. Not everything can be neatly fit into the category of "victim blaming" because at that point you suspend thought and your own common sense.


That's about as classic victim blaming as exists. It's in the genre of "you didn't fight your rapist hard enough, so you weren't raped." One wonders what you think victim blaming is.

It's possible that Lauer might dispute the description, but you've decided to run with it and blame the woman for not resisting a situation that looks like straight-up assault more. If a man lures you into his office under false pretenses, locks the door, and starts making sexual demands, that's not necessarily a safe situation to be in. Complying with coerced commands is not consent.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Tidal wave of sexual assault-misconduct allegations list

Post by _Jersey Girl »

EAllusion wrote:
That's about as classic victim blaming as exists. It's in the genre of "you didn't fight your rapist hard enough, so you weren't raped." One wonders what you think victim blaming is.

It's possible that Lauer might dispute the description, but you've decided to run with it and blame the woman for not resisting a situation that looks like straight-up assault more. If a man lures you into his office under false pretenses, locks the door, and starts making sexual demands, that's not necessarily a safe situation to be in. Complying with coerced commands is not consent.


You're out of your mind. And, not only that, your comments send a message to any woman reading them that they are helpless victims who must passively comply with the demands of a potential attacker. In each of the assault cases, you see no possible way that the assault could have been thwarted by the victim. You are sending a message to any woman who reads your words that she there is no possible way for her to fend off an attacker (unarmed so far as we know in this account, in an office building full of people) that she has no resources are her disposal, so hey, lady, sit back or bend over, and effing take it.

Your attitude does exactly nothing to empower women or engage the possibility, that yes, it's possible for a woman to fend off an attack such as this given the information we have at hand.

I have been in a similar situation to the above account. Just replace the locked office with a locked car. If I can manage to fend off such an attack (given the absence of a weapon) so can other young women. Can a young woman fend off every attack imaginable? No, of course not. It is wrong of you to suggest that women have no personal or physical power to evade or thwart this type of attack.

How horrid are you to suggest that women simply accept becoming the next victim?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Philo Sofee
_Emeritus
Posts: 6660
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:04 am

Re: Tidal wave of sexual assault-misconduct allegations list

Post by _Philo Sofee »

At last! President Trump's accusers have stepped forward.........
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: Tidal wave of sexual assault-misconduct allegations list

Post by _MsJack »

Ravi Zacharias -- Christian apologist (accused of grooming a married woman for sexting)
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Tidal wave of sexual assault-misconduct allegations list

Post by _EAllusion »

Jersey Girl wrote:
EAllusion wrote:
That's about as classic victim blaming as exists. It's in the genre of "you didn't fight your rapist hard enough, so you weren't raped." One wonders what you think victim blaming is.

It's possible that Lauer might dispute the description, but you've decided to run with it and blame the woman for not resisting a situation that looks like straight-up assault more. If a man lures you into his office under false pretenses, locks the door, and starts making sexual demands, that's not necessarily a safe situation to be in. Complying with coerced commands is not consent.


You're out of your mind. And, not only that, your comments send a message to any woman reading them that they are helpless victims who must passively comply with the demands of a potential attacker. In each of the assault cases, you see no possible way that the assault could have been thwarted by the victim. You are sending a message to any woman who reads your words that she there is no possible way for her to fend off an attacker (unarmed so far as we know in this account, in an office building full of people) that she has no resources are her disposal, so hey, lady, sit back or bend over, and effing take it.

Your attitude does exactly nothing to empower women or engage the possibility, that yes, it's possible for a woman to fend off an attack such as this given the information we have at hand.

I have been in a similar situation to the above account. Just replace the locked office with a locked car. If I can manage to fend off such an attack (given the absence of a weapon) so can other young women. Can a young woman fend off every attack imaginable? No, of course not. It is wrong of you to suggest that women have no personal or physical power to evade or thwart this type of attack.

How horrid are you to suggest that women simply accept becoming the next victim?
It's an interesting move to describe criticizing classic blaming of rape victims as "horrid," but if no, if a person doesn't do enough to fend off rape, that doesn't mean they consented.

The described context is a coercive situation. Maybe she can fend him off and maybe not, but if a person submits in that kind of situation that doesn't mean they consented to what follows. This doesn't mean fighting back is impossible. It means that failure to fight back isn't consent. If I point a gun at you and demand you disrobe, it's entirely possible you might be able to get away, but that doesn't mean if you disrobe it's now consent. That's literally what victim blaming is. You might as well criticize her for asking for it by dressing slutty to complete the picture.

This shouldn't have to be explained. Matt Lauer's defense of this situation, if he hopes to not be thought of has having sexually assaulted someone, is to deny it happened like described. You don't lure someone into your office with lies, lock the door behind them, and make sexual demands. The only circumstances where that is acceptable is if it is agreed upon role-playing.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Tidal wave of sexual assault-misconduct allegations list

Post by _Jersey Girl »

EAllusion wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:You're out of your mind. And, not only that, your comments send a message to any woman reading them that they are helpless victims who must passively comply with the demands of a potential attacker. In each of the assault cases, you see no possible way that the assault could have been thwarted by the victim. You are sending a message to any woman who reads your words that she there is no possible way for her to fend off an attacker (unarmed so far as we know in this account, in an office building full of people) that she has no resources are her disposal, so hey, lady, sit back or bend over, and effing take it.

Your attitude does exactly nothing to empower women or engage the possibility, that yes, it's possible for a woman to fend off an attack such as this given the information we have at hand.

I have been in a similar situation to the above account. Just replace the locked office with a locked car. If I can manage to fend off such an attack (given the absence of a weapon) so can other young women. Can a young woman fend off every attack imaginable? No, of course not. It is wrong of you to suggest that women have no personal or physical power to evade or thwart this type of attack.

How horrid are you to suggest that women simply accept becoming the next victim?

It's an interesting move to describe criticizing classic blaming of rape victims as "horrid," but if no, if a person doesn't do enough to fend off rape, that doesn't mean they consented.

It would be an interesting move if only that were what I stated. It's not. This is what I stated in the above post:

How horrid are you to suggest that women simply accept becoming the next victim?

The described context is a coercive situation. Maybe she can fend him off and maybe not, but if a person submits in that kind of situation that doesn't mean they consented to what follows. This doesn't mean fighting back is impossible. It means that failure to fight back isn't consent. If I point a gun at you and demand you disrobe, it's entirely possible you might be able to get away, but that doesn't mean if you disrobe it's now consent.

Nowhere on this thread did I suggest that it's consent. This is exactly what I stated:

If I were in Lauer's position, I would have taken that as a "yes". I contend that anyone would have taken that as a "yes".

That's literally what victim blaming is. You might as well criticize her for asking for it by dressing slutty to complete the picture.

Once again, I made no statements to that effect.

This shouldn't have to be explained.

You're exactly right. You shouldn't have to twist what I said in order to stuff in an "explanation" that has no bearing on what I stated.

Matt Lauer's defense of this situation, if he hopes to not be thought of has having sexually assaulted someone, is to deny it happened like described. You don't lure someone into your office with lies, lock the door behind them, and make sexual demands. The only circumstances where that is acceptable is if it is agreed upon role-playing.

I don't recall raising the issue of his defense.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_MeDotOrg
_Emeritus
Posts: 4761
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: Tidal wave of sexual assault-misconduct allegations list

Post by _MeDotOrg »

Jersey Girl wrote:
EAllusion wrote:
That's about as classic victim blaming as exists. It's in the genre of "you didn't fight your rapist hard enough, so you weren't raped." One wonders what you think victim blaming is.

It's possible that Lauer might dispute the description, but you've decided to run with it and blame the woman for not resisting a situation that looks like straight-up assault more. If a man lures you into his office under false pretenses, locks the door, and starts making sexual demands, that's not necessarily a safe situation to be in. Complying with coerced commands is not consent.


You're out of your mind. And, not only that, your comments send a message to any woman reading them that they are helpless victims who must passively comply with the demands of a potential attacker. In each of the assault cases, you see no possible way that the assault could have been thwarted by the victim. You are sending a message to any woman who reads your words that she there is no possible way for her to fend off an attacker (unarmed so far as we know in this account, in an office building full of people) that she has no resources are her disposal, so hey, lady, sit back or bend over, and effing take it.

Your attitude does exactly nothing to empower women or engage the possibility, that yes, it's possible for a woman to fend off an attack such as this given the information we have at hand.

I have been in a similar situation to the above account. Just replace the locked office with a locked car. If I can manage to fend off such an attack (given the absence of a weapon) so can other young women. Can a young woman fend off every attack imaginable? No, of course not. It is wrong of you to suggest that women have no personal or physical power to evade or thwart this type of attack.

How horrid are you to suggest that women simply accept becoming the next victim?

When my best friend was growing up she was told "If rape is inevitable, just relax and enjoy it."

Swear to God, that's what she told me.

Jersey Girl, I would agree that the objective to raise women with the necessary consciousness and ability to effectively confront a situation like that. But I would imagine that because of different things like low self-esteem and just being unprepared to deal with the situation, some women are overwhelmed. I could see someone saying "If I run out that door screaming, I will be a laughingstock. My bosses' career will be over, and I'll be the butt of dirty jokes."

I think one of the great things to happen with the #metoo movement is that women will less inclined to feel that the world will laugh at them. But I can see someone being in the situation of enduring a private humiliation rather than a public one. Again, I think that attitude was born of a society where women were not believed.

My sister was raped in a car, by more than one man. Sometimes there is no way out. If she tried to fight, she was hit.

But I would never suggest that a woman become the next victim. I would say her first objective should be to survive the experience.
"The great problem of any civilization is how to rejuvenate itself without rebarbarization."
- Will Durant
"We've kept more promises than we've even made"
- Donald Trump
"Of what meaning is the world without mind? The question cannot exist."
- Edwin Land
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Tidal wave of sexual assault-misconduct allegations list

Post by _Jersey Girl »

MeDotOrg wrote:When my best friend was growing up she was told "If rape is inevitable, just relax and enjoy it."

Swear to God, that's what she told me.

I believe you. Take a guess why.

Jersey Girl, I would agree that the objective to raise women with the necessary consciousness and ability to effectively confront a situation like that. But I would imagine that because of different things like low self-esteem and just being unprepared to deal with the situation, some women are overwhelmed

Let me just stop right here and point out that I have walked this earth as a woman for years longer than most posters on this board have likely been alive. I well understand the variables that come into play in these types of situations. I don't know who EA thought he was lecturing or correcting or what-the-hell-ever, but I do have first hand experience (and also second hand accounts--because women talk to each other) to draw on that he'll never have, so he can basically take his overused "victim blaming" cop out and stuff it.

Until we engage the issue beyond what a sick “F” the perpetrator was and recognize that there are indeed self defense and evasive measures that a victim might take (some of which come as reflex to some women though certainly not all), encourage women to take self defense classes in order to determine how, when and whether or not to use such techniques, take measures in an attempt to prevent such things from happening in the work place, and recognize that the feminist movement has let women down, we're no further along in countering these offenses against women than the next string of victims that come along.

I could see someone saying "If I run out that door screaming, I will be a laughingstock. My bosses' career will be over, and I'll be the butt of dirty jokes."

This is where awareness comes into play. This is where the feminist movement has let women down. Sure, we can get the jobs, but how do we handle work place sexual misconduct? More than that, how do we attempt to prevent it from happening? This is the dialogue that needs to be happening right this very moment in time. God help us as a society if we fail to seize this moment.

I think one of the great things to happen with the #metoo movement is that women will less inclined to feel that the world will laugh at them.

I couldn't possibly agree with you more.

But I can see someone being in the situation of enduring a private humiliation rather than a public one. Again, I think that attitude was born of a society where women were not believed.

I can, too. I lived in that society.

My sister was raped in a car, by more than one man. Sometimes there is no way out. If she tried to fight, she was hit.

I am so sorry for your sister. Of course there was no way out or for her to defend herself.

But I would never suggest that a woman become the next victim. I would say her first objective should be to survive the experience.

Yes, the first goal when faced with a crime situation is survival. Again, this is where the dialogue can help and where training can help. Even with training, there is no way to predict how one will respond in such situations. I wrote previously about being trapped in a locked car. I made it out. It's possible to make it out. Not in every situation, but to suggest that stating that it is possible to thwart such an attack amounts to "victim blaming" is simply non-thinking naïvété.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Tidal wave of sexual assault-misconduct allegations list

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2174 ... fl-network

The trio of analysts, all former NFL players, were named in a lawsuit by former NFL Network employee Jami Cantor, who worked as a wardrobe stylist with the company from 2006 until her October 2016 dismissal.

Plus a couple of others. All 5 men named in a wrongful termination suit were sexting her and asking 'invasive' questions about her sexlife.

Huh. That's weird.

- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Post Reply