Xenophon wrote:Poe's opening sequence in TLJ is far and above the most ridiculous in this regard and should be pointed to as the prime example of it before anything else.
THANK YOU.
Xenophon wrote:Poe's opening sequence in TLJ is far and above the most ridiculous in this regard and should be pointed to as the prime example of it before anything else.
MsJack wrote:THANK YOU.
Xenophon wrote:MsJack wrote:THANK YOU.
I don't see how it can escape anyone. In penance for this ridiculous opening shot he has to spend nearly the rest of the movie being an abject failure that still must be saved by Rey, if that helps.
Some other thoughts I had concerned the physics of the Star Wars universe. I know that accuracy was never one of the strong suits of the series but it feels even more off since Disney's purchase (this may partially just be because there aren't a sea of writers to go back and create the apologetics for it). I was curious as to how the bombs fell out of the bombers without gravity (previous iterations of bombers still treated it as a fired projectile even if going "down)" or why running out of fuel was an issue in space when you were already outpacing the star destroyer chasing you (barring some 3rd party interference) shouldn't they have been able to outrun inevitably? I'll acknowledge that part of me worrying about and noticing these things may have been due to not being nearly as immersed in these as I had in previous titles.
EAllusion wrote:The movie is filled with direct parallels to Empire. It doesn't do enough to deconstruct them, so it naturally will feel partially derivative.
I have zero problem with the space battles being physically inaccurate. You just have to accept 'em as the WW II naval battles they are. The only thing that seemed off was the kamikaze attack. If that's physically possible to do, then it would be part of the general weapon design. That was a writing flub to mine some emotion.
Xenophon wrote:... you figured you could just slap a hyperdrive onto some rocks and hurl them at the enemy.
Xenophon wrote:I'm quite late to the thread (apart from a quick meme) as I had been unable to see the movie and didn't want it ruined.
I generally agree that the "over the top" ability of Star Wars heroes to defy odds is a pretty central theme in every movie (it is a space opera for God's sake) and to call out Rey as if she is different in this regard reads as odd, at best. Poe's opening sequence in TLJ is far and above the most ridiculous in this regard and should be pointed to as the prime example of it before anything else.
I too think Luke's response to Ben turning makes little sense given the context of the other movies. This is my Expanded Universe bias talking but Luke often sought isolation but was never one to run from the fight. Although he would sometimes disappear he always came back when the action started and you never had to go looking for him. That said, his parts in the movie are truly some of its better parts. Seconded to the idea of more force stuff, less casino.
With all that in mind, I find that I have disliked the Force Awakens and The Last Jedi as continuations of the original trilogy but I think they are enjoyable movies when viewed in a sort of vacuum and taken just at the sci-fi action movies they have become. I'm also pleased that it appears some of the mysticism that was the Star Wars of my youth has been able to successfully be repackaged and shared with a new set of kids.
EAllusion wrote:Sure. I'm a nitpicky perfectionist with impossible knowledge because I... *checks notes*
...remember the broad outline of the most popular film trilogy of all time.