Markk wrote:But there is 2020, how would you feel about her running again if she is so highly qualified...in your opinion who is more qualified from the left?
How about Garcetti?
Markk wrote:But there is 2020, how would you feel about her running again if she is so highly qualified...in your opinion who is more qualified from the left?
Some Schmo wrote:True. But does that make her more qualified than say Bernie with his years of governing experience?
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Markk wrote:But there is 2020, how would you feel about her running again if she is so highly qualified...in your opinion who is more qualified from the left?
How about Garcetti?
Markk wrote:Kishkumen wrote:Clinton was highly qualified for the job. Trump is highly unqualified and temperamentally unsuited for the job. Out of Clinton, Sanders, and Trump, I don't see how Clinton is not considered the best fit for the job. Trump is a walking nightmare of a human being. Had he not been born into money, he would be no one of note, and perhaps even in prison.
Was she really highly qualified?
She married into the white house and governors house, won the senate in a state that is one of the bluest states, was appointed SoS probably as a promise of endorsement, after losing a bid for president?
Trump has been greasing the pockets of politicians for decades, including the Clinton's...he knows how Washington works.
As far as temperament...Hillary Clinton was hated by those that worked for her..and her losing showed it...she couln't even address the thousands of people that worked for her the night she lost. Most everyone here that hates Trump, when talking about Hillary Clinton as a candidate, has to qualify that they really didn't like her as their choice...which in all reality says it all.
All there are is excuses as to why she lost, the reality is nobody likes her, including her husband.
But there is 2020, how would you feel about her running again if she is so highly qualified...in your opinion who is more qualified from the left?
Markk wrote:Been to LA lately? ...you can't even walk downtown without seeing a tent with a shopping cart parked in front of it. And what is sad is that I am not embellishing this very much. If you could really see the direction LA, and So Ca, is heading...you would be more than shocked.
The economy is booming downtown...and I am sure he gets some credit for the building boom. And getting the Olympics there is a plus to his resume... and deservedly so in that it is his watch, but I really can't explain how bad LA is deteriorating.
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:To solve homelessness you have to solve illegal immigration. What people don't want to admit, from Democrat vote seekers to Republican business types, is when you introduce millions of low-wage laborers you absolutely destroy the workers' ability to make a decent living. Couple that with population pressures on a given geographic area and you're going to get what you get.
No one is going to solve homelessness because no one will solve immigration. Between bleeding hearts and black hearts you get modern-day LA.
- Doc
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Markk,
You're treating the symptoms and not the root cause. Either way, whether or not either one of us is right in our assessment of the situation, it's not going to get solved.
Ever.
And that's sad.
- Doc
Homelessness in LA, is hardly an immigration issue. It is a mental illness issue, drug and alcohol, and just flat out laziness is the problem. African Americans are the highest percentage of homeless downtown from a simple observation.