consiglieri wrote:Sammy Jankins wrote:There are pro and cons to it. The pros are that it helps the community at large realize these things do happen and that accusers should not simply be dismissed. It does spread “sunshine.”
The cons are that she didn’t consent to it and her past mistakes are now being examined even if we don’t know her name. And apparently it might hurt her settlement.
I have obtained some background information through generally reliable sources that this woman is dissembling when she says she did not give the recording to MormonLeaks.
It is also not strictly correct when she says she did not consent to its release.
She gave the recording to MormonLeaks with consent to its release, and changed her mind four hours before it was set to go public last Monday.
It may be her desire for retribution on Joseph Bishop by having the recording publicized interfered with the backroom negotiations her attorney was engaged in with the church.
This suggests to me that the Church was actively preparing to settle but not do anything in terms of Bishops membership status. Reinforcing my view that the Church does not take sexual abuse seriously enough to change anything. It would have settled, quietly, had people sign NDA's and carried on as if nothing had happened. The Church facilitates sexual abusers.