FOX News Getting Beat up By Teenagers

[_Hawkeye]

Advertisers are pulling out of the Laura Ingram show. Something that is fairly typical with FOX news characters because they cannot control themselves. They went after the school survivors because they are pressing for politicians to do something about guns. Typical. Always politics before brains when it comes to FOX.

Ingram attacked 17 year old David Hogg, mocking him for getting rejected at several colleges and they saying he was "whining" about it. She also said his "15 minutes of fame were up." Hogg's 14 year old sister got on Twitter and told her to grow up. David Hogg asked Ingram for a list of her biggest sponsors and then the next thing you know several have dropped her show.

Ingram quickly apologizes but only because it is the "spirit of holy week." What an idiot fraud this woman is. Her and her stupid ash cross on her forehead, screaming for attention, "Look at me, look at me, I'm a Christian and not afraid to advertise it." Too bad she has no Christian values. I doubt a priest put that on her forehead that same morning, but rather her makeup artist just minutes before her show aired.

http://www.businessinsider.com/laura-in ... ign-2018-3

[_subgenius]

Your OP is incorrect...there is only 1 advertiser...singular not plural...that has initiated the process of pulling out advertising...a pet food company and that is all according to your cited article (even its title is singular). Hardly cause for such a hair-fire claim of "getting beat up"....geez.

[_Hawkeye]

Your opening post is incorrect...there is only 1 advertiser...singular not plural...that has initiated the process of pulling out advertising...a pet food company and that is all according to your cited article (even its title is singular). Hardly cause for such a hair-fire claim of "getting beat up"....geez.

Nutrish, TripAdvisor, Wayfair, Expedia and Nestlé are the five companies that have pulled out thus far.

No wonder Laura frantically had to issue an apology in an attempt to stop the bleeding.

FOX and the Right Wing media have persistently attacked these kids, mocking them for being dumb kids who know nothing and numerous memes hit social media started by the NRA mocking them for claiming they could have an effect on policy, or that they're dumb enough to believe they could start a revolution.

A GOP legislator from Maine attacked Emma Gonzalez calling her a "skinhead lesbian."

The fact is Laura picked a fight with this kid and he's kicking her ass all over the place. She's already kissing his ass with a fake apology and trying to draw him back on her show, two weeks after she said his 15 minutes of fame was done.

[_MissTish]

Johnson & Johnson, Hulu ans Stitch Fix have pulled their ads now.

Hogg- 8
Ingraham- 0

[_Hawkeye]

Johnson & Johnson, Hulu ans Stitch Fix have pulled their ads now.

Hogg- 8
Ingraham- 0

And by the way subgenius, plural means more than 1.

8>1

[_grindael]

Poor bug-genius ... he so obsessed with homosexuality and penises, and with hair on fire that he ignores the facts constantly and just makes stuff up so he can be the first to object to whatever he deems is his precious Republicans getting caught in their hypocrisy and other ridiculous situations... He reminds me of another troll, who used to prowl these hallowed halls of discussion in the guise of a Panda and who also was prone to jumping the gun and setting himself on fire...

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Your OP is incorrect...there is only 1 advertiser...singular not plural...that has initiated the process of pulling out advertising...a pet food company and that is all according to your cited article (even its title is singular). Hardly cause for such a hair-fire claim of "getting beat up"....geez.

How the “F” do you do this? I mean, how many times do you have to demonstrate a complete and utter grasp on reality reality? “F” man. Just google a bit before your dumb ass thinks to post. Jesus.

As news of the boycotts began coming out on Thursday, Ms. Ingraham apologized. “On reflection, in the spirit of Holy Week, I apologize for any upset or hurt my tweet caused him or any of the brave victims of Parkland,” she said, extending an invitation for Mr. Hogg to appear on the show.

Mr. Hogg said he was unimpressed by the apology.

“She only apologized after we went after her advertisers,” he said. “It kind of speaks for itself.”

- Doc

[_subgenius]

Your OP is incorrect...there is only 1 advertiser...singular not plural...that has initiated the process of pulling out advertising...a pet food company and that is all according to your cited article (even its title is singular). Hardly cause for such a hair-fire claim of "getting beat up"....geez.

How the “F” do you do this? I mean, how many times do you have to demonstrate an utter lack of reality? “F” man. Just google a bit before your dumb ass thinks to post. Jesus.

As news of the boycotts began coming out on Thursday, Ms. Ingraham apologized. “On reflection, in the spirit of Holy Week, I apologize for any upset or hurt my tweet caused him or any of the brave victims of Parkland,” she said, extending an invitation for Mr. Hogg to appear on the show.

Mr. Hogg said he was unimpressed by the apology.

“She only apologized after we went after her advertisers,” he said. “It kind of speaks for itself.”

- Doc

i was correct in correcting the exaggeration of OP, and her apology does not confirm the OP claim at all...you should read for comprehension.
To presume to understand her motivation for the apology and who/what motivated her is as short sighted as this impish and soon to be gone attention starved teenager.
Nevertheless, having one advertiser threaten to cancel is still not a justification for the hair-fire that has smoked the OP.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

It's 15 now.

eta: You dumb “F” ing muppet.

- Doc

[_Hawkeye]

i was correct in correcting the exaggeration of opening post, and her apology does not confirm the opening post claim at all...you should read for comprehension.

In order for your assertion to be a correction, it would first need to be correct. It isn't, and this has been pointed out to you numerous times now, but to no avail. Your head is firmly shoved up your own colon. And you didn't accuse me of exaggerating, you accused me of lying:

You have floated this lie on another thread, and your own cited article proves your post as false...1 company...1, count it as 'one', pet food company is "starting" to pull out.

Your entire argument focuses on the businessinsider article I linked, which was written earlier in the day well before several other sponsors backed off the show. But even this article said that at the time Nutrish was the only sponsor to quit "thus far."

To presume to understand her motivation for the apology and who/what motivated her is as short sighted as this impish and soon to be gone attention starved teenager.

Attention starved teenager? It was Ingraham who went after him, not vice versa. But thanks for reminding us again what a horror of a human being you truly are. You're basically picking up where Ingraham left off in her attacks. And for you to sit there are say her apology had nothing to do with sponsors running for the hills, then you're confirming once again that you're just a troll and a moron.

Nevertheless, having one advertiser threaten to cancel is still not a justification for the hair-fire that has smoked the opening post.

You're still repeating this lie, even after more than a dozen more have dropped her? You're going to keep sticking with the "one advertiser" argument?