Bach wrote:I mean liberal educators have lowered the bar for years. Why we would we expect these young liberal scholars to research any history before they speak?
Ironic given the neocon rewriting of history that is fundamental to pundits like Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly in their outrage propagation hair fire perpetuation scheme they have finely crafted to bilk money from old people and idiots.
But on top of that you're also Mormon. So you likely view the history of the western hemisphere as including meaningful migrations of proto-Christian groups with genetic ties to the Israelites not just once but multiple times. Oh, and if you're Mormon there's a better than even chance you disbelieve in evolutionary theory, too. So the ancient mythologies of the Middle East are historical text books for you.
Talk about having a low bar. Credulity, thy name is Bach.
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth? ~ Eiji Yoshikawa
Bach wrote: That truly is a relevant observation and crystallizes my very point of a liberal education. Why should we expect these students to research history from waaaay back ago nine years? I mean liberal educators have lowered the bar for years. Why we would we expect these young liberal scholars to research any history before they speak? Especially that which, by liberal standards of a decade old, would be considered ancient history for the snowflake students. God forbid them to have the initiative to take it upon themselves to do any research or thinking on their own when all they’ve been taught is entitlements and activism!
Great point Kevin.
Just go eat your crow in the corner already and stop trying to salvage your already refuted point. Now you're saying these kids, all of whom look younger than 20, are all "Liberal scholars" who should have "researched into the reasons" why someone received a Nobel Prize 9 years ago, because we all know that any random Right Winger, educated or not, would be able to explain the justification for Juan Manuel Santos receiving the prize just two years ago, right?
This is typical FOX News. Some idiot does a quick survey of some students and picks out three he thinks will support the narrative he was driving at, assume they're "Liberals" (earth to Morons, many Republicans don't like Trump either) just because they don't believe Trump deserves the prize.
They might as well give him the peace prize. Nothing about his presidency is legitimate anyway. Nothing about his relationships, businesses, claims, family, or even his last name is legitimate either.
From a certain perspective, everything written about Drumpf is fake news, since the news is about the biggest fake in history.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
Some Schmo wrote:They might as well give him the peace prize.
Barring an outbreak of insanity on the Nobel Prize selection committee, American conservatives should create their own award. Call it the No-Bell Prize. It could be a solid gold miniature replica of Trump sitting on a golf cart. Fox News could dedicate a week's worth of programming to this honor for Trump.
Sooner or later, both Liberty University and BYU will award honorary doctorates to Trump.