honorentheos wrote: The language on which the debate hung was on if the failure to vote being the trigger for sending the notice to confirm residency violated a clause in the National Voter Registration Act that failing to vote could not be the reason someone is removed from the rolls.
Okay. I just have one question. Why did the Supreme Court stop anti-abortion laws? Really help me understand please.
Have you read Roe v. Wade?
“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”
― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
honorentheos wrote: The language on which the debate hung was on if the failure to vote being the trigger for sending the notice to confirm residency violated a clause in the National Voter Registration Act that failing to vote could not be the reason someone is removed from the rolls.
Okay. I just have one question. Why did the Supreme Court stop anti-abortion laws? Really help me understand please.
What do you mean? In the past you've expressed the idea you think doctors should be the ones who decide. But I've never had the impression you thought about this beyond the idea there should be a medically defined line that becomes the legal boundary for when a fetus qualifies as a human life. There's a lot to unpack when it comes to abortion legislation and Supreme Court rulings but it might help if you provide some explanation for what you know or think is the case regarding that history.
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth? ~ Eiji Yoshikawa
honorentheos wrote: What do you mean? In the past you've expressed the idea you think doctors should be the ones who decide. But I've never had the impression you thought about this beyond the idea there should be a medically defined line that becomes the legal boundary for when a fetus qualifies as a human life. There's a lot to unpack when it comes to abortion legislation and Supreme Court rulings but it might help if you provide some explanation for what you know or think is the case regarding that history.
I do support abortion. I just want to know the reasoning behind the abortion ruling. Where in the constitution does it say that women have the right for an abortion?
honorentheos wrote: What do you mean? In the past you've expressed the idea you think doctors should be the ones who decide. But I've never had the impression you thought about this beyond the idea there should be a medically defined line that becomes the legal boundary for when a fetus qualifies as a human life. There's a lot to unpack when it comes to abortion legislation and Supreme Court rulings but it might help if you provide some explanation for what you know or think is the case regarding that history.
I do support abortion. I just want to know the reasoning behind the abortion ruling. Where in the constitution does it say that women have the right for an abortion?
It doesn't. There are other rights involved.
ETA: I'd also use "rulings" in the plural. There is a body of applicable rulings which need to be considered in total. And I'd be curious what you know about them.
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth? ~ Eiji Yoshikawa
