Generally speaking, were we to take away the forced separation policy of the Trump administration I don't think there is much in what you say with which I outright disagree. My issues come from having to frame the discussion through that decision, though. For example when you say -
Jersey Girl wrote:SKS provides transition and emotional support. They fully understand the nature of what the children need and how to meet their needs. It would be akin to placing someone like me in the program. For example, someone like me is trained and educated to meet the social/emotional needs of children, how to guide behavior and provide curriculum that is intellectually stimulating with intentionality.
If that was in the context of children being processed with their parent or only referring to truly unaccompanied minors I'd be on board. But there is no way that this takes the place of a parent or mitigates the trauma of a child being removed from their parent or parents.
Or
People are rightly concerned about the well being of the children. Keep in mind, however, that a significant number of children have already been impacted by violence in their country of origin. If SKS is hooking them up with therapeutic solutions, it can only help.
If we were only talking about kids who had fled violence or were sent by adults in Central America to other adults in the US then again, I'd be nodding yes. But inserting forced separation changes that. We're causing trauma and then saying, "But we're providing help, too!"
And as I said previously, no one wants to see children separated from their parents for even a few days much less a month or so. If there were some way to facilitate visits between the adults and children while they are detained, that would be a plus. However, some of the adults are being jailed.
The Trump administration apparently does want to see children separated from their parents. Saying otherwise is a gross misrepresentation of what their policy actually means. Sessions has basically argued that a parent who brings a child with them should be treated as if they were a human trafficker smuggling a minor into the country. That's BS.
I do think you are trying to approach this fairly, but I don't think it's possible to do so without acknowledging that the Trump admin is deliberately attempting to circumvent laws regarding the way families and minors who arrive here without visas are to be treated. They have made it explicit where their priorities are, and that the consequences to the children involved is acceptable to them as collateral damage. They can't even step up and own that much, though, and insist that the negative consequences are the fault of Democrats. That's just wow to me.