Some Schmo wrote:Good point. If there's one thing Joseph Smith and BY taught us, it's that America is the land of opportunity to take your sex cult mainstream.
Damn straight!
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Some Schmo wrote:So that's what this is about. All the other right wing crackpots are afraid they won't get to lie publicly on social media either.
Poor little snowflakes. Here's an idea: try acknowledging reality. See where that takes you.
I don't know Schmo. If we are not free to live in unreality, then what will happen to religion?
What’s hilarious is that Facebook and other social media outlets restrict what can and can’t be posted all the time. Porn, nudity, certain types of advertisements, links to other social media platforms, etc have been forbidden for years but the blind faith trumpster pearl graspers like water dog haven’t said crap. All of a sudden, when one of their misinformation overlords is treated like the garbage he is, they are up in arms about how private companies shouldn’t be able to control the content they allow because that somehow equates to the govt restricting free speech. Lol.
These people have literally lost the ability to think rationally as this is one of the stupidest things I have read here in a long time and that is saying a lot considering we have full blow hood wearing, sister diddling racists and barely literate, holocaust denying basement dwellers posting here regularly. Trump and Alex jones certainly don’t seem to cater to the brightest among us.
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents "I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
schreech wrote:What’s hilarious is that Facebook and other social media outlets restrict what can and can’t be posted all the time. Porn, nudity, certain types of advertisements, links to other social media platforms, etc have been forbidden for years but the blind faith trumpster pearl graspers like water dog haven’t said crap.
Well, boobies make us touch ourselves and that would feel good.
Um . . . . which is wrong, very wrong, and I want to avoid lying to my bishop so much.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Water Dog wrote:... the more interesting discussion to have is how far are you willing to go?
Alex Jones has been testing out how much we are willing to tolerate for many years. Finally, companies are stepping forward and saying no more. Those companies should be liable for all false accusations Alex Jones makes on a regular basis because they have been supplying him the medium to spread his accusations. This is not some guy simply stating his political opinions through various social media outlets. He is actually harming individuals.
schreech wrote:...this is one of the stupidest things I have read here in a long time and that is saying a lot considering we have full blow hood wearing, sister diddling racists and barely literate, holocaust denying basement dwellers posting here regularly.
You're comparing this debate to holocaust denial and incest? Oh my, how long is your nose that you can't see past it? Mark my words, this issue is going to end up at the Supreme Court. As it already has in the past when the issue was far less consequential.
The public forum doctrine protects speech in, and a speaker's right of access to, spaces that fulfill an important communicative function in the community. This Part explores the doctrine, and in particular, its application by courts protecting speakers' access rights to property that, while private, plays a vital role as an arena for discourse. The paradigmatic example of a public forum on private property has been the modem shopping center. ...
Under the doctrine of PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, cable systems can be construed as public forums. Such a designation represents, in this context, a minor restriction on the property and speech rights of the cable operator.
moksha wrote:Alex Jones has been testing out how much we are willing to tolerate for many years. Finally, companies are stepping forward and saying no more. Those companies should be liable for all false accusations Alex Jones makes on a regular basis because they have been supplying him the medium to spread his accusations. This is not some guy simply stating his political opinions through various social media outlets. He is actually harming individuals.
Jim Crow against political speech. Wow. Just wow. Wew.