1984 in 2018

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_canpakes
_Emeritus
Posts: 8541
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:54 am

Re: 1984 in 2018

Post by _canpakes »

schreech wrote:Bingo. I got sucked in by the excitement of mockably stupid arguments. I should have bowed out sooner, the mocking and dismantling was completed many posts ago.

Please, don't apologize. Continue the merciless mocking; these sorts of folks deserve to suffer such mocking when they align themselves with self-interested crackpots and end up pushing their lines of BS in the pursuit of their selfish indifference and devotion to undermining the Nation.

These people would wipe their arse in public with the Constitution if they could make a dollar off of the show.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: 1984 in 2018

Post by _Kishkumen »

Water Dog wrote:They are shadow banning conservatives. A few weeks ago they admitted it. I see it EVERY DAY on Twitter. Every. Day. The pattern is unmistakable. Friends of mine, personal friends, reasonably well known bloggers, I won't see anything from them unless I visit their page directly. I see mention of something they tweeted in an article online. Huh, interesting I never saw that in my feed. They even block referred traffic from sources they don't like. They'll block a blog for instance, or a referring Twitter user. Then when you click on those links going to some referred tweet, they won't appear. You'll get "system is busy try again" messages repeatedly, hitting refresh over and over dozens of times, but then magically after removing the src tag from the URL their servers start working.

http://minx.cc:1080/?post=376296


You sent me to some dude’s blog, which links to Breitbart, which links to Vice. Why not just send me to Vice so I don’t have travel through an underworld of false information that’s destroying minds?

If you actually READ the ENTIRE, original article, it becomes apparent that faulty programming to sift out Russian trolls resulted in this fiasco. Meanwhile, Alex Jones was not being impacted at all. There was a hearing about it. Testimony from experts about the nature of the problem, and it was fixed.

I think that the extent to which conservatives are being “shadow banned” is probably the result of clumsy efforts to manage the deluge of false information that pollutes the cyber landscape. The “conservative” information network is so intertwined with nutbar conspiracist material and trolls that it would be very difficult to get that right. It should be done right. It needs to be done correctly. But I am willing to give tech companies the benefit of the doubt and expect “conservatives” to clean up their act and stop spreading obviously false conspiracy nonsense.

But lo and behold, they have been busy turning this problem into a conspiracy too. Next thing you know there will be a child sex ring thrown into the narrative. Oh, and Hillary Clinton.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: 1984 in 2018

Post by _Some Schmo »

Kishkumen wrote: But I am willing to give tech companies the benefit of the doubt and expect “conservatives” to clean up their act and stop spreading obviously false conspiracy nonsense.

You don't really expect that, do you?

Kishkumen wrote:But lo and behold, they have been busy turning this problem into a conspiracy too. Next thing you know there will be a child sex ring thrown into the narrative. Oh, and Hillary Clinton.

Now this, I expect.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: 1984 in 2018

Post by _Kishkumen »

Some Schmo wrote:You don't really expect that, do you?


I’m not holding my breath, certainly. The flagship news organization of modern conservatism, FOX News, gave citizen Trump airtime to talk Birtherism long before we hit this low point. Both sides of the spectrum have their nutbars, but FOX puts them on prominent display.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: 1984 in 2018

Post by _Some Schmo »

Kishkumen wrote:
Some Schmo wrote:You don't really expect that, do you?


I’m not holding my breath, certainly. The flagship news organization of modern conservatism, FOX News, gave citizen Trump airtime to talk Birtherism long before we hit this low point. Both sides of the spectrum have their nutbars, but FOX puts them on prominent display.

And this is the real difference between the American right and left. The left is rationally embarrassed by the crazy behavior of their radicals. The right elevates and celebrates theirs.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: 1984 in 2018

Post by _Kishkumen »

Some Schmo wrote:And this is the real difference between the American right and left. The left is rationally embarrassed by the crazy behavior of their radicals. The right elevates and celebrates theirs.


It seems so. The “conservative” misinformation matrix is the world most people on the Right live in every day. It’s the air they breathe. They reject the sane voices and privilege the nuts. Now the whole environment is permeated by an information illness. Sane people on the Right generally keep their mouths shut or publicly announce their departure from the GOP. Those hanging in there do so in part out of the (probably correct) belief that if they leave their replacements will be much, much worse. The Nazis we’ve already seen popping up here and there. This is Trumpworld.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: 1984 in 2018

Post by _Kishkumen »

"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Ceeboo
_Emeritus
Posts: 7625
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am

Re: 1984 in 2018

Post by _Ceeboo »

Kishkumen wrote:The “conservative” misinformation matrix is the world most people on the Right live in every day. It’s the air they breathe. They reject the sane voices and privilege the nuts.

Rather than me offering you my opinion about your opinions, I think I'll just seek some clarity.
Are you suggesting that "most people on the right" privilege Alex Jones and reject sane voices? Or have I misunderstood?
The Nazis we’ve already seen popping up here and there.

Can you point me to a few examples of these Nazis popping up here and there?
_Ceeboo
_Emeritus
Posts: 7625
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am

Re: 1984 in 2018

Post by _Ceeboo »

Ceeboo wrote:
The Nazis we’ve already seen popping up here and there.

Can you point me to a few examples of these Nazis popping up here and there?


I think I found a couple of these Nazis!

Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk (Two of these Conservative Nazis you speak of perhaps?) were having breakfast in Philadelphia a few days ago. Fortunately for us (and all of America) they were unmasked for their Nazi ways by about 25 of our modern american role models. While they tried to eat, they had eggs and water thrown on them with loud courageous screams of "Get out of here you Nazis/Fascists". I thought the "“F” the police" chants were really special too. Yeah - nuts and sane voices.

https://youtu.be/zVScEu6HM7E
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: 1984 in 2018

Post by _Chap »

Ceeboo wrote:Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk (Two of these Conservative Nazis you speak of perhaps?) were having breakfast in Philadelphia a few days ago. Fortunately for us (and all of America) they were unmasked for their Nazi ways by about 25 of our modern american role models. While they tried to eat, they had eggs and water thrown on them with loud courageous screams of "Get out of here you Nazis/Fascists". I thought the "____ the police" chants were really special too. Yeah - nuts and sane voices.


As some Schmo remarked:

The left is rationally embarrassed by the crazy behavior of their radicals.


I have never heard of this person before, and I don't approve of people breaking the law by assaulting people with eggs.

But if there is any truth in what we find here, I hope that there are also some people on the right who find Canda Owens just a teeny bit embarrassing too:

She has called for the imprisonment of Hillary and Bill Clinton, former FBI director James Comey, and special counsel Robert Mueller, as well as TV anchors such as Jake Tapper, Rachel Maddow and Anderson Cooper.[5]
Race relations[edit]
Owens is known for her criticism of [Black Lives Matter]].[4][26][27][28] She has described Black Lives Matter protesters as "a bunch of whiny toddlers, pretending to be oppressed for attention."[29] Owens has argued that African Americans have a "victim mentality" and often refers to the Democratic Party as a "plantation".[24][26] She has argued that the American left "like black people to be government-dependent".[30] Owens has argued that black people have been brainwashed to vote for Democrats.[3] She has argued that police violence against black people is not about racism.[26][29] According to The Guardian and the Daily Beast, Owens has referred to police killings of black people as a trivial matter to African Americans.[24][8]
After the 2017 white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Owens said that concern over rising white nationalism was “stupid.”[5]
Climate change[edit]
Owens rejects the scientific consensus on climate change.[31][5] She has called climate change a lie used to “extract dollars from Americans.”[5]
Me Too Movement[edit]
Owens described the #MeToo Movement - which was an international movement against sexual harassment and assault - as "stupid" and said that she "hated" the movement.[32][33] Owens wrote that the #MeToo Movement was premised on the idea that "women are stupid, weak & inconsequential."[32][33] She is critical of feminism.[34]
Abortion[edit]
She has said that abortion is “extermination” of black babies.[5]
Welfare[edit]
She has advocated for an end to all welfare programs.[5]
Other[edit]
She attended the opening of the United States embassy in Jerusalem.[35] She is critical of the press and open borders policies.[34] She has called for the immediate deportation of all undocumented immigrants.[5]
In May 2018, Owens praised Louis Farrakhan's tweet endorsing Donald Trump with a description of “a really big deal” and “relevant.”[32] Afterward, Owens received criticism from conservative figures for praising Farrakhan - who has a history of anti-semitic remarks - Owens deleted the tweet.[32]
She has described George Soros and “globalists” as among the most urgent threats in the United States.[5] She has said that conservative critics of her are generally “secret socialists.”[5]
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Post Reply