Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:I see Lemmie refuses to answer the scenario in question.
That's because, as Lemmie pointed out, it was idiotic.
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:I see Lemmie refuses to answer the scenario in question.
EAllusion wrote:If someone insists that they *want* systemic racial discrimination because they enjoy the benefits, all you can do is either appeal to their moral sensibility or appeal to others to shun and shut them out of power. If you think it is human nature for slave owners to never give up their slaves, that's fine. Persuadeable people are out there. If they weren't, people would not feel so threatened by discussing the problem in the first place.
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:EAllusion wrote:If someone insists that they *want* systemic racial discrimination because they enjoy the benefits, all you can do is either appeal to their moral sensibility or appeal to others to shun and shut them out of power. If you think it is human nature for slave owners to never give up their slaves, that's fine. Persuadeable people are out there. If they weren't, people would not feel so threatened by discussing the problem in the first place.
Wow. Once again EAllusion ups and creates a whole universe out of his ass. When are you giving your job up to a deserving POC, murderer?
- Doc
Jersey Girl wrote:What the bloody hell is going on with this thread? Anyone?
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: Spaniards (I don't know the ethnic term for them, my bad Other White People).
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ... the system itself promotes women ... at virtually every echelon, from education, to grants, to contracts, to promotion, and everything in between.
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:What's insane to me is the argument that White PrivilegeTM exists systemically. In order for this stupid and redundant claim to be made one would have to believe that White People are homogeneous enough to actually find ways for the system to favor random White People based off their skin color alone.
Seems like your own, err, "special" reasoning could be turned on this position. So much for needing something like absolute cultural homogeneity for racial biases to exist in the system. But otherwise, lol. No, doc; it is overwhelmingly beneficial, on average, to be white in the United States due to a large range of racial advantages that constitute "white privilege." Gainsaying this, in part because you appear to refuse to engage academics above a ludicrous strawman level, doesn't help anything.Meanwhile, back on planet Earth, the system itself promotes women and privileged minorities over Whites and un-privileged minorities at virtually every echelon, from education, to grants, to contracts, to promotion, and everything in between. Whites are openly discriminated against, held back, and judged not by the content of their character or their abilities, but rather on the unfortunate mistake of having been born with less pigment in their skin than people who get promoted based on gender, skin color, or minority status.
Who is advocating a quantifying discrimination and rectifying it by discriminating against white people in equal measure? I can't tell if this is your fun house mirror description of affirmative action or if you have something else in mind, but white privilege being a thing doesn't logically demand any particular solution and no one here is advocating anything like what you describe.How does one quantify White Privilege in order to equitably discriminate against White People?