Tucker Carlson and Avenatti go at it

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

I think the question is silly because someone abandoning their husband and three children for a completely different lifestyle at the age of 39 after 17 years of marriage is nothing like what Stormy Daniels has done.

She doesn't have to abandon anyone. It's just a different career choice. How would you feel if she started acting in porn?

- Doc

[_EAllusion]

Doc, you might not be aware of this, but people who get married often agree to enter a mongamous relationship. If a person breaks that agreement, that might be a problem even if both parties in principle see nothing wrong with the idea of people having more than one sexual partner. Your question, or rather the implied argument in it, is ridiculous. It doesn't even require adding the porn qualifier since the infidelity is likely the problem. To fix it, you could ask "what if a single person you know filmed sex for money?" but then you just might get a response that they are totally fine with it.

Unless KG has a *really* open relationship with his wife, a "no" doesn't mean what you apparently think it does.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Doc, you might not be aware of this, but people who get married often agree to enter a mongamous relationship. If a person breaks that agreement, that might be a problem even if both parties in principle see nothing wrong with the idea of people having more than one sexual partner. Your question, or rather the implied argument in it, is ridiculous. It doesn't even require adding the porn qualifier since the infidelity is likely the problem. To fix it, you could ask "what if a single person you know filmed sex for money?" but then you just might get a response that they are totally fine with it.

Unless KG has a *really* open relationship with his wife, a "no" doesn't mean what you apparently think it does.

What's my implied argument since you're so good at mind reading?

- Doc

[_EAllusion]

Doc, you might not be aware of this, but people who get married often agree to enter a mongamous relationship. If a person breaks that agreement, that might be a problem even if both parties in principle see nothing wrong with the idea of people having more than one sexual partner. Your question, or rather the implied argument in it, is ridiculous. It doesn't even require adding the porn qualifier since the infidelity is likely the problem. To fix it, you could ask "what if a single person you know filmed sex for money?" but then you just might get a response that they are totally fine with it.

Unless Kevin Graham has a *really* open relationship with his wife, a "no" doesn't mean what you apparently think it does.

What's my implied argument since you're so good at mind reading?

- Doc

You are implying that answering that he would not be Ok with his wife going into porn validates criticisms of being Ok with Stormy Daniels' sex work. I mean, if you aren't doing that, then you're asking an especially irrelevant question and acting like it is a serious matter. Either way, the proper response is lol.

[_subgenius]

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/09/13/tucker-carlson-michael-avenatti-interview-creepy-porn-lawyer-battle-over-stormy-daniels

Tucker truly is human garbage. Now he's pretending he cares about Stormy and wanted to protect her from Avenatti's exploitation.

wha? insincerity on television? now that is groundbreaking observation!

Avenatti got in some really great lines that just made Tucker shrivel up, not knowing how to respond. Like telling Tucker is is so ignorant that he doesn't even know Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to two felonies.

This commentary is a bit odd...its like a contest to you, or something "more" than what is there...nevertheless, your highly subjective interpretation is superfluous.

"How can you be this ignorant and have your own news show"?

Ask Rachel Maddow because apparently it only takes viewers in a demographic that appeals to advertisers.

And like constantly pointing out Trump screwed a porn star without a condom while his 4 months old son was nursing. Carslon didn't deny it and actually said he believed it to be true.

And while that may seem "newsworthy" to you...it does not exclude the notion that Avenatti is exploiting Stormy.

OK, so why the effing hell is he focused on attacking Avenatti for representing a Porn Star, and not interested in criticizing President whom he believes committed adultery with her?

Just that you can't make this distinction is troubling....but perhaps we should check with Rachel Maddow ? she might have priorities more in line with your world view.....its odd that you are watching Fox News.

Which is the more newsworthy story?

clearly, you don't want an answer.

He kept going on and on with nervous laughter, saying Avenatti is wearing expensive clothes while Stormy Daniels is still stripping. WTF?

ok?

That's what she WANTS to do. Good God.

the irony in you stating this sentiment is not lost....not lost at all.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

You are implying that answering that he would not be Ok with his wife going into porn validates criticisms of being Ok with Stormy Daniels' sex work. I mean, if you aren't doing that, then you're asking an especially irrelevant question and acting like it is a serious matter. Either way, the proper response is lol.

Wow. You're really, really bad at mind reading. Really bad.

I'll wait for KG to answer the question in good faith since he started a thread where he admitted, probably inadvertently, that Stormy Daniels is a slut (and that's it's somehow bad to shame her for being a whore).

- Doc

[_EAllusion]

Calling something "slut shaming" isn't calling the target a slut. Jesus. Learn words.

Kevin is under no obligation to play Socratic games with irrelevant questions.

[_Kevin Graham]

[_Kevin Graham]

You are implying that answering that he would not be Ok with his wife going into porn validates criticisms of being Ok with Stormy Daniels' sex work. I mean, if you aren't doing that, then you're asking an especially irrelevant question and acting like it is a serious matter. Either way, the proper response is lol.

Wow. You're really, really bad at mind reading. Really bad.

I'll wait for Kevin Graham to answer the question in good faith since he started a thread where he admitted, probably inadvertently, that Stormy Daniels is a slut (and that's it's somehow bad to shame her for being a whore).

- Doc

Since I never said she was a "slut," and you are, I think it is important to define what you mean.

Someone who has had multiple sex partners?

I'll admit that if EA is wrong, then I certainly have no idea where else you could be going with this.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

You said that Stormy was being slut-shamed. You imply she's a slut else how would she be shamed?

Look. If you're not going to answer the question we really can't move this dialogue forward. I don't want to play the "EA Can Read Your Mind Better Than You Can Therefore He Creates an Argument Out of Thin Air" game.

- Doc