Kevin Graham wrote:Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:I'm not asking if your wife is going to get into porn, ya goofball. I'm asking you how you'd feel if she decided to become a pornographic actress. That's all. It's a very simple question to answer, but you somehow can't wrap your mind around simply sharing how you, Kevin Graham, would feel if she were to choose to do that.
- Doc
I'd feel sad doc. Really really sad.
Your point now?
THANK YOU.
I assume, and you can correct me if I'm wrong, that you'd feel sad because you view the work as dishonorable? Or immoral? Whatever word you want to use to describe your feelings on the work itself probably carries a negative connotation for you.
See. You're in a pickle here when making a value judgement against Tucker Carlson:
Tucker truly is human garbage. Now he's pretending he cares about Stormy and wanted to protect her from Avenatti's exploitation.
...
And like constantly pointing out Trump screwed a porn star without a condom while his 4 months old son was nursing. Carslon didn't deny it and actually said he believed it to be true.
OK, so why the effing hell is he focused on attacking Avenatti for representing a Porn Star, and not interested in criticizing President whom he believes committed adultery with her? Which is the more newsworthy story? He kept going on and on with nervous laughter, saying Avenatti is wearing expensive clothes while Stormy Daniels is still stripping. WTF? That's what she WANTS to do. Good God.
You seem to want both to use Ms. Daniel's chosen profession as some sort example of a disgust (Trump had sex with her without a condom implies venereal disease, thus Ms. Daniels is a diseased woman, and she's diseased because she's a whore) and then in the same post you flip and imply that it's totally cool because that's what she wants to do.
So. Which is it? Is Ms. Daniels an untouchable or is she pursuing an honorable profession that she wants to pursue as a free woman?
You also impugn Mr. Carlson's reputation because he's expressing outrage, or whatever, that her attorney is using her to further his own agenda. The thing is you're doing the same thing, just on a smaller scale. You're using Ms. Daniels as a moral cudgel with which to batter Trump's reputation, but at the same time you're defending her immorality.
So. Here's the pickle.
You clearly view Ms. Daniels' profession as problematic, and perhaps disgusting. You wouldn't approve if a loved one chose the same career field. So. We have the following:
1) Carlson is a degenerate because he pretends to care about Ms. Daniels, but is presumably disgusted by her.
2) Trump is a degenerate because he had unprotected sex with Ms. Daniels, more so because she's a porn actress.
3) Avenatti, who is using Ms. Daniels to further his career merits no value judgement on your part.
4) You hold contradicting opinions about Ms. Daniels and her profession which undermine your moral value judgement against Trump, who is a known adulterer, but you seem fixated on the relationship he had with her.
In other words, your OP doesn't make any sense regarding your value judgement that Mr. Carlson is human garbage because he takes the lawyer to task for using Ms. Daniels to further his own career because you and Mr. Carlson both share a disgust of Ms. Daniels and you both are using her to further your own political agenda.
-Doc