Bach's THREE Mueller Report threads, combined

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Hopefully the report addresses questions like:

Why did Trump's Campaign Chairman and Deputy Campaign Chairman meet with a former Russian intelligence officer?

Konstatin Kilimnik met with Trump Campaign Chairman Manafort and Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates on August 2nd 2016 where Manafort shared internal polling data with the Russian operative. According to Andrew Weissman, a prosecutor on Special Counsel Mueller's team, the meeting is “very much to the heart of what the special counsel’s office is investigating."

Why did the Trump Campaign meet with Russian operatives during the 2016 Presidential Campaign at the Trump Tower?

One of the Russian operatives, Natalia Veselnitskaya, is an outspoken opponent of the Magnitsky Act. Trump Jr. admitted to discussing adoptions, which means they discussed Russian sanctions. Russia banned Americans from adopting Russian orphans in retaliation for the Magnistky Act sanctions that targeted Russia's oligarchs. While the Kremlin has vehemently denied Veselnitskaya working for the Russian government, Swiss authorities allege that she was involved in an attempt to enlist a foreign country's law enforcement agent as a double-agent to work for the Russians. She did this on behalf of Russian Deputy Attorney General Saak Albertovich Karapetyan who was recently killed in a helicopter accident. Moreover, in 2017 at the G20 summit Putin and Trump discussed adoptions and the Magnitsky Act. The other Russian operative present at the infamous Trump Tower meeting, Rinat Akhmetshin, has ties to Russian intelligence and has a history of being embroiled in court cases related to hacking campaigns. Russian operative Rinat Akhmetshin also has ties to former Trump Campaign Adviser and convicted felon Paul Manafort.

Why did senior Trump Campaign officials direct Roger Stone to find out about Wikileaks releasing illegally hacked damaging information on the Clinton Campaign?

At a time when then candidate Trump had been warned by the FBI that Russians and other foreign adversaries would try to interfere with the election and was asked to alert the FBI of any suspicious overtures to their campaign. Despite the intelligence briefing then candidate Trump continued to deny any wrong-doing by the Russians during the campaign.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROGER JASON STONE, JR.

4. ROGER JASON STONE, JR. was a political consultant who worked for decades in U.S. politics and on U.S. political campaigns. STONE was an official on the U.S. presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump (“Trump Campaign”) until in or around August 2015, and maintained regular contact with and publicly supported the Trump Campaign through the 2016 election. 5.

5. During the summer of 2016, STONE spoke to senior Trump Campaign officials about Organization 1 and information it might have had that would be damaging to the Clinton Campaign. STONE was contacted by senior Trump Campaign officials to inquire about future releases by Organization 1.

11. By in or around June and July 2016, STONE informed senior Trump Campaign officials that he had information indicating Organization 1 had documents whose release would be damaging to the Clinton Campaign. The head of Organization 1 was located at all relevant times at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, United Kingdom.

12. After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by Organization 1, a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact STONE about any additional releases and what other damaging information Organization 1 had regarding the Clinton Campaign. STONE thereafter told the Trump Campaign about potential future releases of damaging material by Organization 1.

17. On or about October 7, 2016, Organization 1 released the first set of emails stolen from the Clinton Campaign chairman. Shortly after Organization 1’s release, an associate of the high-ranking Trump Campaign official sent a text message to STONE that read “well done.” In subsequent conversations with senior Trump Campaign officials, STONE claimed credit for having correctly predicted the October 7, 2016 release.

- Doc

[_ajax18]

America used to be about cherishing shady narcissistic con artists? Well, I've got news for you buddy: Republicans still hold to this ideal!!!

Don't worry. Welfare and SSI disability checks are still coming on time to those that qualify.

[_Kevin Graham]

The report has already proven itself not to be a "witch hunt" because, you know, 37 indictments. It proved all suspicions that Russia was interfering in the elections. Donald Trump has gone on record many times saying they didn't help him or even try to help him, saying it was all a hoax, saying it was a witch hunt. That Right Wing talking point has already been blown out of the water but the idiots on the Right think they've won something simply because there wasn't enough evidence to indict Trump's family?

Bach's idiotic claim that tens of millions was wasted ignores all the money that was recovered from the Manafort scam, and it also ignores the six Benghazi hearings that was more expensive and led to a grand total of zero indictments. His claim also proves the point that Republicans only pretend to care about the "rule of law" which is something they love to harp on in the context of immigration. They think the rule of law only applies to poor minorities. When wealthy white Republicans engage in massive cons that rob Americans of billions, they should be allowed to get away with it.

"Liberals" have been saying for many months now that the real juice is going to come from the SDNY. What they're investigating and what they allege they have evidence to show (Trump's felonies) is something beyond Trump's reach of influence. Once he's out of office, he's likely going to jail if he lives long enough. And people like subs, bach and ajax will all be gloating about how he got away with it because, you know, they care about the "rule of law."

People don't realize how difficult it is to PROVE obstruction of justice. Even when he does it in plain daylight on national television, he just has to say he was "joking" or what not. If it weren't for the Nixon tapes, he never would have been impeached. There was never anything solid like tapes or video of Trump engaging in these crimes which is likely the only reason why no one in his family was indicted.

Just Remember:

Benghazi: 950 days, 0 indictments, 0 charges

Mueller: 674 days, 37 indictments, With Multiple Investigations spawned and still ongoing

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Bach's idiotic claim that tens of millions was wasted ignores all the money that was recovered from the Manafort scam...

Just Remember:

Benghazi: 950 days, 0 indictments, 0 charges

Mueller: 674 days, 37 indictments, With Multiple Investigations spawned and still ongoing

It'll most likely be in the black when they secure Manafort's ill-gotten lucre. Also, let's not forget how much Bach's Boys spent on Bill Clinton because he got a blowjob in the West Wing.

- Doc

[_subgenius]

It'll most likely be in the black when they secure Manafort's ill-gotten lucre. Also, let's not forget how much Bach's Boys spent on Bill Clinton because he got a blowjob in the West Wing.

- Doc

But no collusion, and Clinton did actually get a bj...thus maintaining your high bar for the "integrity of the West Wing".
But it will be fun to see you guys spin the difference of "guilt" between Hillary Clinton and Trump on any points of "not enough evidence" (see also no indictment from Starrr for Hillary Clinton on perjury).

[_canpakes]

... the difference of "guilt" between Hillary Clinton and Trump on any points of "not enough evidence" ...

Just repeating upstream information:

Benghazi: 950 days, 0 indictments, 0 charges

Mueller: 674 days, 37 indictments, With Multiple Investigations spawned and still ongoing

Reading is fundamental. : )

[_Bach]

Mueller report summary made public. Have a great weekend - what’s left of it.

I’m heading out for a great big “nothing burger”!!!

[_Dr. Shades]

How do you know it's a major bummer for EAllusion and Kevin Graham when you haven't even read it?

[_Bach]

For two years I’ve watched, INMHO most posters here’s being led on by the bias media. They checked their brains w Chris Mathews, Rachel Maddow, CNN and the rest and spent their life buying into the “great hoax”! I’m not sure if it’s just a sampling size of this board or it’s defining character!

People, learn to think for yourselves!! Please, just once on your lives. Don’t need to say anything more!!!

I called it two years ago right on this board.

Crocodile tears are flowing here and at Mainstreet media.

BARR RELEASES THE SUMMARY! It’s devasting to the left!

[_Dr. Shades]

[MODERATOR NOTE: This is your second thread about the Mueller Report in 11 minutes. Let this be your last one.]