Some Schmo wrote:I feel bad for these posts. Sorry Shades. I was totally exaggerating.
It's probably closer to one out of half a billion adults.
You see, Markk? HE'S STILL DOING IT!
Perfume_Lover it is.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
I forgot who gets to choose his new avatar, so there's a temporary one in place while we wait.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Markk wrote:I'll make a bet with him now that he does get impeached before the end of this term...loser gets a tattoo of perfume on the chest.
Sounds like more of a reward than a punishment.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Remember, Some Schmo Perfume_Lover, your username and avatar may have changed, but Universal Rule #11 still applies to you.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Perfume_Lover wrote:If you're going to make me lie about my opinion of Perfume via my screen name, you're going to have to endure me setting the record straight.
In other words, rather than suck it up, you're going to do your utmost to escape the consequences of a voluntarily-undergone bet? :-)
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"