subgenius wrote:canpakes wrote:He doesn’t know. He is unable to express a coherent explanation on why he believes that a raped woman should be forced to bring to term an egg within her that was fertilized by the rapist’s sperm.
Correct me if I misread the recent legislations...but doesn't Georgia still allow abortion prior to 6 weeks...prior to a heartbeat?...ergo, a raped woman is not being forced to do anything (post rape that is). Or are you proposing that a woman, being such a poor fragile creature, is unable to discern what to do with her rape-baby until the 7th week?
Or are you more in line with Hillary Clinton, whereas the rape-baby should be almost out of the birth canal...big toe still in there, and WHACK - hammer to the head is a perfectly reasonable expression of a woman maintaining control over her body?
yes, coherence is not really selecting you as a standard bearer - but thanks for slumming with us.
Oh, look. You couldn’t answer the question. I am so
not surprised.
Maybe you’d like to take another crack at it?
While you’re at it, here are a couple more for you:
1. Can you explain the biological or scientific reasoning behind why a
heartbeat becomes your line in the sand?
2. Can you speak to which 100-percent accurate pregnancy tests that freshly-raped women can start using, and hopefully generating those accurate test results within enough time to schedule and have an abortion at one of the state’s three abortion facilities prior to hitting the six week deadline? (I’m also kinda wondering what new state-mandated embryo testing will be implemented to make sure that our rape victim hasn’t hit Day 43 since impregnation to avoid legal peril, but maybe that can be a
bonus question for you)
Thanks; I eagerly await your answers to all three questions. I’ll go get a coffee while you work on that. K?