Res Ipsa wrote:It should not be restored. The fact that Ajax said he has a daughter, described his hopes for, and said he thinks she’s pretty, doesn’t give anyone license to demean her as part of an attack on Ajax.
That is not the issue. The deletion was made on the grounds that, contrary to board rules, it contained personal information from another board that the person posting it had not disclosed on this one. KG apparently disputes that this was the case.
Zadok: I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis. Maksutov: That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Res Ipsa wrote:It should not be restored. The fact that Ajax said he has a daughter, described his hopes for, and said he thinks she’s pretty, doesn’t give anyone license to demean her as part of an attack on Ajax.
That is not the issue. The deletion was made on the grounds that, contrary to board rules, it contained personal information from another board that the person posting it had not disclosed on this one. KG apparently disputes that this was the case.
The issue is whether it should be restored. If it violates another rule, it should.
“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”
― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
In my plodding and literal-minded way, I am addressing the stated grounds on which the moderators chose to delete parts of KG's post.
If those grounds are shown by KG to be false, and the post is restored (as would logically follow it should be) then you will of course be free to ask for it to be deleted in whole or in part or moved to another forum, on whatever other grounds you think are cogent. Till, then ...
Zadok: I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis. Maksutov: That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
I testify in the name of oxygen deprived high desert dwellers, that my friend KG did not post information from another source besides what my friend Ajax18 posted here.
If you don't want your kid to get dragged all over hell's acre here, it's best not to throw them on the table for someone else to pick clean.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Kevin Graham wrote:I don't care if it is restored, I just don't want this meme floating around that I am out there trying to dig up private information on posters here. That's never once happened.
cough............cough
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
Chap wrote:In my plodding and literal-minded way, I am addressing the stated grounds on which the moderators chose to delete parts of KG's post.
If those grounds are shown by KG to be false, and the post is restored (as would logically follow it should be) then you will of course be free to ask for it to be deleted in whole or in part or moved to another forum, on whatever other grounds you think are cogent. Till, then ...
You assume far too much, Chap. There is no rule requiring Shades to list multiple grounds for deletion or to restore a post before considering whether it violates a different rule.
“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”
― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
Jersey Girl wrote:I testify in the name of oxygen deprived high desert dwellers, that my friend KG did not post information from another source besides what my friend Ajax18 posted here.
If you don't want your kid to get dragged all over hell's acre here, it's best not to throw them on the table for someone else to pick clean.
I respectfully disagree. Nobody has the right to mock or demean Jersey Boy simply because you’ve talked about him here.
“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”
― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
Chap wrote:In my plodding and literal-minded way, I am addressing the stated grounds on which the moderators chose to delete parts of KG's post.
If those grounds are shown by KG to be false, and the post is restored (as would logically follow it should be) then you will of course be free to ask for it to be deleted in whole or in part or moved to another forum, on whatever other grounds you think are cogent. Till, then ...
You assume far too much, Chap. There is no rule requiring Shades to list multiple grounds for deletion or to restore a post before considering whether it violates a different rule.
For goodness gosh darn sakes. Was the content in violation of TR 2? And Shades can do whatever he sees fit to do regarding content on this board. Spirit of the law and all that jazz. He doesn't owe us an explanation unless he wishes to supply one.
What is this a courtroom?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”
― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
Jersey Girl wrote:I testify in the name of oxygen deprived high desert dwellers, that my friend KG did not post information from another source besides what my friend Ajax18 posted here.
If you don't want your kid to get dragged all over hell's acre here, it's best not to throw them on the table for someone else to pick clean.
I respectfully disagree. Nobody has the right to mock or demean Jersey Boy simply because you’ve talked about him here.
I was talking about kids though.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb