Every time Midgley posts about gemli, he makes stuff up, and tries to make gemli’s history look worse, at least in his eyes:
Louis Midgley TimErnst • 7 hours ago • edited
The problem with gemli is that he has exactly no real roots in any form of Christian faith. His parents were merely nominal Roman Catholics. I doubt that they owned a Bible and that gemli witnessed them praying. gemli seems to have exactly no foundation in the Bible. His only encounter with Roman Catholic faith was a very brief experience with some teaching Nuns when the one now hiding his identity as gemli was very young, which he soon shed. And gemli has subsequently made exactly no effort to understand Christian, Jewish or Muslim faith. Each of these is profoundly grounded in and involves human experiences with the divine. This means that one must pay close attention to history to begin to understand why people find meaning in those faith traditions. gemli has demonstrated a near total ignorance of and hostility towards history, which is a key element of his bizarre dogmatic atheist religion.
After watching his gemli re-writes unfold, it’s clear Midgley has ZERO credibility in any story he tells. These re-writes of gemli’s history are pretty amusing, though. Maybe that’s his goal, truth be damned.
If you look at Nostradumbass’ Disqus account, 9 out of his 10 most recent posts are gemli-attacks. He’ll often go on gemli-sprees posting five, six, or even seven gemli-obssessed posts waxing fanciful about every aspect of gemli’s life. You know you’re doing the right thing when Louis C. Midgley, a.k.a. ‘thatlittle crap’, complains about you.
I would be willing to wager that head to head, gemli has a better command of the teachings of Christianity than Midgley does.
Midgley's immature desperation to continually attempt to discredit Gimli without ever getting into substance of Gemli information gives Midgley's deep black sticky fear that Gemli is right completely away. Thomas Riskas discusses this in detail, and man does Midgley fit the bill absolutely perfectly as Riskas describes it in such fascinating detail. The name calling, the deflection, the attempts at intimidation, the actual fear which comes out of Midgley who is attempting (cheaply and ineffectively) to hide that fear through mockery and sarcasm... Riskas is far more credible now to me than he ever was. Midgley would be my perfect prime example of why Riskas view is accurate.
Midgley is seriously terrified and mentally disturbed at how science dismantles Joseph Smith and Mormonism.
After watching his gemli re-writes unfold, it’s clear Midgley has ZERO credibility in any story he tells. These re-writes of gemli’s history are pretty amusing, though. Maybe that’s his goal, truth be damned.
