Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Philo Sofee
_Emeritus
Posts: 6660
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:04 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Philo Sofee »

NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

NO ONE should turn them in. This is beyond the value of gold! Lets see what Mormons are actually like fer real, not the fake holy sanctimonious kind people they fake imagining they are doing God a service. Let the reality shine forth!
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Philo Sofee wrote:NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

NO ONE should turn them in. This is beyond the value of gold! Lets see what Mormons are actually like fer real, not the fake holy sanctimonious kind people they fake imagining they are doing God a service. Let the reality shine forth!


Screw that. I was posting under my in real life name. I was open about who I was. The Midge called for Mr. Peterson to ban me, and he did. Those two routinely excoriate others for using handles and are desperate to doxx users. Even when someone meets their criteria for honesty they can't handle it. But what's worse they keep claiming people are too cowardly to post under their real names even after banning some of us who do.

They don't deserve to use Patheos' platform to spew their nonsense, violate the terms of use, and act like we're the ones without backbones. They can find another forum that tolerates that kind of behavior.

- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_Philo Sofee
_Emeritus
Posts: 6660
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:04 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Philo Sofee »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Philo Sofee wrote:NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

NO ONE should turn them in. This is beyond the value of gold! Lets see what Mormons are actually like for real, not the fake holy sanctimonious kind people they fake imagining they are doing God a service. Let the reality shine forth!


Screw that. I was posting under my in real life name. I was open about who I was. The Midge called for Mr. Peterson to ban me, and he did. Those two routinely excoriate others for using handles and are desperate to doxx users. Even when someone meets their criteria for honesty they can't handle it. But what's worse they keep claiming people are too cowardly to post under their real names even after banning some of us who do.

They don't deserve to use Patheos' platform to spew their nonsense, violate the terms of use, and act like we're the ones without backbones. They can find another forum that tolerates that kind of behavior.

- Doc


Ah, all right, actually that also makes sense........ and on the other hand, it IS our folks who GO there to talk, and NEVER the apologists tom come HERE and talk isn't it.......
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Philo Sofee wrote:NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

NO ONE should turn them in. This is beyond the value of gold! Lets see what Mormons are actually like fer real, not the fake holy sanctimonious kind people they fake imagining they are doing God a service. Let the reality shine forth!


Screw that. I was posting under my in real life name. I was open about who I was. The Midge called for Mr. Peterson to ban me, and he did. Those two routinely excoriate others for using handles and are desperate to doxx users. Even when someone meets their criteria for honesty they can't handle it. But what's worse they keep claiming people are too cowardly to post under their real names even after banning some of us who do.

They don't deserve to use Patheos' platform to spew their nonsense, violate the terms of use, and act like we're the ones without backbones. They can find another forum that tolerates that kind of behavior.

- Doc


Dr. Shades offered to create an account for Midgley so that he could post here. I predict that he won't do it, because Midgley is basically a coward. They are afraid of the posters on this board, and know that they will be bested by us. Slinging insults from afar is the best that "Woody" can muster.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Philo Sofee
_Emeritus
Posts: 6660
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:04 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Philo Sofee »

Dr. Scratch
Dr. Shades offered to create an account for Midgley so that he could post here. I predict that he won't do it, because Midgley is basically a coward. They are afraid of the posters on this board, and know that they will be bested by us. Slinging insults from afar is the best that "Woody" can muster.

When he gains his Deityhood and invents his own universe, Midget Herr Lord Almidgley can then, like Yahweh (who stole his idea from the Egyptian Min, and heavens knows where the Greeks came up with this superpower for their own Zeus daddy), throw his own made by hand lightning bolts at all those who mock his greatness, who mock his holiness, and who refuse to share information with their real name, and to be anointed with a holy 4th anointing. I mean, come on, a mere second anointing of Jehovah's plan ain't nearly as egotistically impressive as doubling that to an impressive FOUR anointings to make damn good and sure you actually do receive all the blessings promised! Man people would obey you for millenia to get so high an anointing yes? So those childish insults made from afar in pure cowardice and fear of being throttled with logic and actual refutations, along with real evidences are going to become the overpowering might and great display of pure power in real lightning bolts in his future universe!!! So be careful lest we piss off the Midget His Lordship Almidgley, here in this life, for the next life in his universe could be very quite terrible bad.... we may have to actually bow down and suck on his kiss his........little...........finger.
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Lemmie »

Just for continuity, and since it directly speaks to midgley's Patheos terms of service violations, I hope Everybody Wang Chung doesn't mind if I post his comment from another thread:
Everybody Wang Chung wrote:Dr. Scratch,

Speaking of surveillance, Woody is now threatening to publicly reveal information about our very own Dr. Shades unless people stop up-voting his comments.

Folks, you can't make this stuff up.


Louis Woody Midgley wrote:Dear fake "Dr. Shades": I urge some caution. Why? More rancid opining, and fakes up-voting error and evilopining on Dan's blog, might end up with your real name being more widely known on Dan's blog.

Just settle in and expect that I may continue to refer to you as Dr. Gallimaufry when you comment on Dan's blog.

I don't intend to respond to the other part of your comment. The reason is that I believe that you must understand my preference for what I believe is a more appropriate handle than "Dr. Shades." I might, of course, be giving you too much credit, especially given that gang of fakes that you have marshaled to mess with Professor Peterson's blog.


https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... qus_thread
viewtopic.php?p=1193033#p1193033
_Everybody Wang Chung
_Emeritus
Posts: 4056
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:53 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Everybody Wang Chung »

I can't imagine Patheos would be okay with Midgley threatening to publicly post in real life information about Dr. Shades if people up-vote his comments.

I guarantee if anyone said that about Midgley they would be banned immediately by Peter$on. Just more hypocrisy and another example of the how toxic and hate-filled SeN is.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Louis Midgley wrote:No, of course not. Fred Kratz should by now have begun to realize that, metaphorically speaking, sic et non is not a place for lunatics--that is, fake doctors--from an asylum to drop a load on on Dan's living room carpet. With this in mind, I urge Fred to give some actual thought to his response. Put another way, what exactly does he make of gemli's opinion that sic et non is the place where what he calls "Mormonism" is shown "to make a shambles of reality." Does such a one have a firm grip on reality? Yes or No? And should they not at some point realize that they should find some other venue at which they can post up a storm?
(emphasis added)
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Lemmie »

:lol: midgley is very much occupied by poop, is he not? Interspersed with spit or swallow references, his fecal preoccupation is well established. Remember when he likened an interest in something to a young boy sniffing around an outhouse, waiting and hoping for a "full load" to "sniff"? His autobiographical forays are quite revealing.
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Lemmie wrote::lol: midgley is very much occupied by poop, is he not? Interspersed with spit or swallow references, his fecal preoccupation is well established. Remember when he likened an interest in something to a young boy sniffing around an outhouse, waiting and hoping for a "full load" to "sniff"? His autobiographical forays are quite revealing.


I don't know, Dr. Lemmie. I think that there might be other valid interpretations of the data. For example, it could be that Midgley's remark has more to do with his perceptions of the virility of the other people who are commenting. Wouldn't that be more or less in keeping with the other observations that people have made about this "academic" colleague?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Post Reply