Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _moksha »

Doctor Scratch wrote:
Everybody Wang Chung wrote:Just had lunch in Provo with two members of the Maxwell Institute.

They have both been getting a huge kick out of reading SeN and the many recent meltdowns Prie$tcraft and Woody are having. It's the gift that keeps on giving.


Oh, I have no doubt that the people at the Maxwell Institute are laughing uproariously at Midgley and Peterson.

Wonder if those Maxwellians ever look at this board?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Philo Sofee wrote:Man.... we are gittin ALL the good guys! WOO HOO! This is great!


Nice when we get more new members innit?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Dr LOD
_Emeritus
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 6:24 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Dr LOD »

Dr Moore wrote:
Dr LOD wrote:Oh and thanks Dr Moore for jumping in on The Midgley, and pinning him against a wall with his own words.


Nice to meet you Dr. Vegan Burrito!


Dan thought he was oh so clever with this one. He kept up calling me that for months. I finally had to break it to him that it was the spellchecker on his computer who was the clever one.

I’m still banned, not sure exactly what set that off. I felt I had some good questions that they didn’t have answers for.

Probably the most illuminating was both Dan and Midgley’s understanding of the DNA essay. They are stuck in the 70’s when all brown people were lamanites. I had two well published genetics professors (one TBM LDS) read the DNA essay and give their impression which does not match with Peterson’s understanding.
_Pahoran
_Emeritus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Pahoran »

Dr LOD wrote:I’m still banned, not sure exactly what set that off.

No. You are not.

It was a lie when you first told it. It is still a lie.

But don't let that slow you down. Liars are highly valued here.

Not only that, it's the kind of lie that might just become true if you keep up the spite.

Dr LOD wrote: I felt I had some good questions that they didn’t have answers for.

You were wrong.
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Lemmie »

Moore: "It is what some would call a 'hit piece.'"

Dan Peterson: “Incorrectly and perhaps propagandistically so.”

:lol: who talks like that? What pretentious pomposity.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Careful, Kiwi. Ain’t no one here to protect your six when you’re being an asshole. If you want to be treated with respect you better start showing it.

- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Gadianton »

Lemmie,

Mr. Midgley himself called it a hit piece:

Midgley wrote:When those in charge of the Seminary and Institute program of the Church of Jesus Christ asked me to respond specifically to Palmer's duplicity and apostasy,


This isn't "intellectual history" by any stretch of the imagination. Just in case anyone on this thread is confused about that.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Pahoran
_Emeritus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Pahoran »

Dr LOD wrote:Oh and thanks Dr Moore for jumping in on The Midgley, and pinning him against a wall with his own words.

No. He did not.

Your fellow liar tried to do that, of course. He quoted a sentence from Lou, and claimed that Lou had "admitted" that his review of Palmer's nonsense was a "hit piece." But Moore slyly trimmed the portion where Lou explicitly denied that that was the case. It wasn't an "admission" at all. Moore flatly lied when he claimed that it was.

No wonder you so gushingly approve.

I think you and Moore have at last found your true level.

Enjoy the Liars' club. You'll fit right in.
_Pahoran
_Emeritus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Pahoran »

Everybody Wang Chung wrote:Just had lunch in Provo with two members of the Maxwell Institute.

Really?

Was that before or after your trip to the Holy Land with Dan?

You know - the one you kept bragging about but never took.
_Pahoran
_Emeritus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Pahoran »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Careful, Kiwi. Ain’t no one here to protect your six when you’re being an [CamNC4Me]

There. Fixed it for you.
Post Reply