US pulling out of North Syria

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: US pulling out of N. Syria

Post by _EAllusion »

I think the depth of Trump support is largely illusionary and would vanish quickly if right-wing media turned on him. Right-wing media would turn on him if the Republican party did. And McConnell has the power to make the Republican party turn on him the moment he wants it to.

But a lot of the things we think of as bad about Trump aren't things that McConnell thinks about as bad about Trump.
_honorentheos
_Emeritus
Posts: 11104
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:17 am

Re: US pulling out of N. Syria

Post by _honorentheos »

I don't think so. Right-wing media turned on both the party and on Trump last December over immigration and the wall. They proved who holds the leash on the beast. The Fox News/Breitbart shift towards populism is not out of party or Trump loyalty. Tucker Carlson isn't spouting off pseudo-anti-capitalist views on his show because it is popular with the Republican party or Trump. It's because the monster needs that narrative to feed on now. It's where things have evolved to and why McConnell's party is only effective as counter-punchers and obstructionists.
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth?
~ Eiji Yoshikawa
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: US pulling out of N. Syria

Post by _EAllusion »

The alt-rightish part of the Republican party that is ideologically committed to those views is quite small compared to those who say they hold those views because they're listening to non-stop rightwing propaganda.

Brietbart is genuinely alt-rightish, but a lot of the right-wing ecosystem are just grifters and Republican leadership messaging tools that will shift when the political winds do. If Trump goes down and Murdoch(s) decide that it makes sense to cut ties, then they will cut ties. They'll always have been at war with East Asia and that's the way it will be.

McConnell has the power to make that happen. He's a far more influential and insidious figure than Trump is in many ways.
_honorentheos
_Emeritus
Posts: 11104
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:17 am

Re: US pulling out of N. Syria

Post by _honorentheos »

EAllusion wrote:McConnell (is) a far more influential and insidious figure than Trump is in many ways.

We certainly agree on this point.
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth?
~ Eiji Yoshikawa
_Icarus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1541
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:01 pm

Re: US pulling out of N. Syria

Post by _Icarus »

EXCLUSIVE: OFFICIAL WHO HEARD CALL SAYS Trump GOT 'ROLLED' BY TURKEY AND 'HAS NO SPINE'

Donald Trump got "rolled" by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a National Security Council source with direct knowledge of the discussions told Newsweek.

In a scheduled phone call on Sunday afternoon between President Trump and President Erdogan, Trump said he would withdraw U.S. forces from northern Syria. The phone call was scheduled after Turkey announced it was planning to invade Syria, and hours after Erdogan reinforced his army units at the Syrian-Turkish border and issued his strongest threat to launch a military incursion, according to the National Security Council official to whom Newsweek spoke on condition of anonymity.

The U.S. withdrawal plays into the hands of the Islamic State group, Damascus and Moscow, and the announcement left Trump's own Defense Department "completely stunned," said Pentagon officials. Turkey, like the United States, wants regime change in Syria. Russia and Iran support the Assad regime.

"President Trump was definitely out-negotiated and only endorsed the troop withdraw to make it look like we are getting something—but we are not getting something," the National Security Council source told Newsweek. "The U.S. national security has entered a state of increased danger for decades to come because the president has no spine and that's the bottom line."

Newsweek granted the National Security Council official anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly. The source said it would not be surprising to see a Turkish incursion in the next 24 to 96 hours.

Turkey has long considered the Kurdish militia in Syria to be a terrorist insurgency, despite the United States providing military and financial aid to the group in its fight against ISIS, the Islamic State militant group. A battle with the vastly superior military of Turkey, a NATO ally, could drive the Kurds into the arms of Bashar Al-Assad, the Syrian dictator that Washington wants ousted, and by extension into an alliance with Russia and Iran, two U.S. rivals with forces in Syria.

The White House said late Sunday evening in a statement that Turkey will soon invade northern Syria but both the Defense Department and Trump on Twitter said they made clear to Turkey that they do not endorse a Turkish operation in northern Syria.

"As I have stated strongly before, and just to reiterate, if Turkey does anything that I, in my great and unmatched wisdom, consider to be off limits, I will totally destroy and obliterate the Economy of Turkey (I've done before!)," said Trump on Twitter Monday. "They must, with Europe and others, watch over the captured ISIS fighters and families...it is time now for others in the region, some of great wealth, to protect their own territory."

According to the NSC official, who had first-hand knowledge of the phone call, Trump did not endorse any Turkish military operation against Kurdish Forces, but also did not threaten economic sanctions during the phone call if Turkey decided to undertake offensive operations.

In a statement, White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham said, "The United States Armed Forces will not support or be involved in the operation, and United States forces, having defeated the ISIS territorial "Caliphate," will no longer be in the immediate area."

The New York Times reported Monday that about 100 to 150 American forces would withdraw from northern Syria but not completely from the country. Newsweek confirmed the Times reporting but the National Security Council official said the number was closer to 230 service members, among them U.S. Special Forces and reconnaissance units.

The Times also reported witnesses observed United States forces withdraw from two observation posts in Tel Abyad and Ein Eissa in northeastern Syria. Newsweek confirmed these on Monday—a senior Defense Department official said American forces are about 90 percent complete with the withdraw as of publication.

One of the main issues in the phone call between the two world leaders concerned the roughly 2,000 Islamic State militant prisoners being held by the Kurdish-dominated Syrian Defense Forces in northeastern Syria, who the U.S. military assists financially.

Trump told Erdogan he did not want anything to do with ISIS prisoners despite the United States not currently detaining Islamic State prisoners in Syria. The Syrian Defense Forces control custody of the prisoners.

Erdogan said Turkey would take custody of the ISIS militant prisoners, according to the White House statement and the National Security Council official Newsweek spoke to for this story.

"The ISIS prisoners, some of them, will eventually be freed amongst the chaos, and remain in the area or go elsewhere to rejoin the fight," speculated the National Security Council official.

The White House statement on Sunday also expressed Trump's long-held frustration with how other NATO-allied countries had dealt with captured Islamic State group fighters. The statement singled out "France, Germany and other European nations," for refusing to take back their citizens who had joined the Islamic State militant group.

U.S. Army General Mark A. Milley, Trump's newly minted chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, is scheduled to meet with the service chiefs this morning to discuss the matter, said National Security Council source.

The National Security Council official said they could not speak about what Trump's admirals and generals may plan, but said they would not expect anything out of the usual norms as the Defense Department follows orders with or without advanced knowledge.

If the United States had refused to move out of Turkey's war path, U.S options would not just be the threat of potential conflict between nation-state militaries, it would have been applied pressure on the Turkish economy, according to the National Security Council official.

However, the United States chose not to stand its ground to protect Kurdish Forces against Turkish airstrikes as a part of Trump's "America First policy" and his historical views that war is bad for business, according to the official.

On Sunday, Erdogan reinforced his army units at the Syrian-Turkish border hours after he issued his strongest threat to launch Turkish forces over the border and into the "buffer zone," between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.

The buffer zone—sometimes referred to as the peace corridor—was established to prevent another Turkish invasion of northern Syria. The United States had been working to establish a proper demilitarized zone prior to Trump's endorsement of Turkey's military plans.

If Trump's withdraw of U.S. forces had not occurred, the National Security Council official told Newsweek, the United States could have continued to refine the buffer zone on the Syrian-Turkish border.

"To be honest with you, it would be better for the United States to support a Kurdish nation across Turkey, Syria and Iraq," said the National Security Council official. "It would be another Israel in the region."

The current foreign policy debacle is what prompted Trump's former defense secretary, James Mattis, to resign his post after Trump decided to abruptly withdraw American forces from Syria in December 2018. Mattis was the last of the generals touted as the "adults" in the administration—and was an outspoken opponent of a Syrian withdrawal.

A senior Defense Department official told Newsweek in January no U.S. general was happy with the decision to pull back U.S. troops from Syria as Pentagon officials feared the withdrawal could spark an ISIS resurgence similar to the Taliban's growing influence and territory in Afghanistan.

Administration officials in January told Newsweek Trump's sudden withdraw order could undercut strategic U.S. alliances with regional allies; free Russia and Iran to re-establish a full military presence and solid footing in the Mediterranean; and leave U.S.-backed Kurdish fighters vulnerable to being decimated by a Turkish air campaign.

A complete withdrawal could also potentially give up a valuable regional position to American military forces that threaten United States interests in the region, including the interests of allies such as Israel and, to some extent, Jordan.

The National Security Council official compared Turkey to "playground bullies" on Monday.
"One of the hardest things for me to accept is the fact that Kevin Graham has blonde hair, blue eyes and an English last name. This ugly truth blows any arguments one might have for actual white supremacism out of the water. He's truly a disgrace." - Ajax
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: US pulling out of N. Syria

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Icarus,

As a reminder the very people that need to read that article are literally incapable of reading that article. They LITERALLY cannot read that article. It's too much. The word count stands at 1305. I went ahead and took it down to 168, and I'm going to re-work the font and added pictures to capture their attention:

Donald Trump got "rolled" by Turkish President

Image

The U.S. withdrawal plays into the hands of the Islamic State… and Moscow.

Image

"President Trump was definitely out-negotiated and … Syrian Defense Forces control custody of the prisoners.

Image

Erdogan said Turkey would take custody of the ISIS militant prisoners, according to the White House statement and the National Security Council official Newsweek spoke to for this story.

Image

"The ISIS prisoners, some of them, will eventually be freed amongst the chaos, and remain in the area or go elsewhere to rejoin the fight..

"To be honest with you, it would be better for the United States to support a Kurdish nation across Turkey, Syria and Iraq," said the National Security Council official. "It would be another Israel in the region."

Image

- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: US pulling out of N. Syria

Post by _EAllusion »

https://Twitter.com/just_whatever/status/1183230450879234048

Cool.

[Warning: The video contained in the link is graphic. It contains footage of a dead political/human rights activist.]
_canpakes
_Emeritus
Posts: 8541
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:54 am

Re: US pulling out of N. Syria

Post by _canpakes »

_DoubtingThomas
_Emeritus
Posts: 4551
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:04 am

Re: US pulling out of N. Syria

Post by _DoubtingThomas »

EAllusion wrote:A lot of anonymously sourced reports this morning are indicating that both NATO allies and the Pentagon were blindsided by Trump's decision to abandon the Kurds to Turkish invasion.

Okay, first let me say that I honestly don't know who the Kurds are. Please explain why it is very important for the US military to protect them? Should (or can) the US military also protect the rest of the world? Why are the Kurds so special?
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: US pulling out of N. Syria

Post by _subgenius »

DoubtingThomas wrote:
EAllusion wrote:A lot of anonymously sourced reports this morning are indicating that both NATO allies and the Pentagon were blindsided by Trump's decision to abandon the Kurds to Turkish invasion.

Okay, first let me say that I honestly don't know who the Kurds are. Please explain why it is very important for the US military to protect them? Should (or can) the US military also protect the rest of the world? Why are the Kurds so special?

Its only important to the more Hawkish members of our government. . . but Trump ran on a platform of ending the endless wars and bringing troops home. Basically we farmed out our fight against ISIS in the area to the Kurds with them having a goal of being independent of Turkey (see also civil war and PKK)..The reality is that the "worse" of Syria occurred under Obama but all of that, and now, has led to ISIS effectively being trapped in Syria and scattered. Now should ISIS flare up, the powers that be (eg Russia, Syria) will strike without the same regard for collateral damage that the US has...but where does it end? Nowhere . . . middle east 101 teaches us that this area is straight tribal war(s) steeped in centuries old traditions of tribal war . . . see also basically any and every factual, historical, and theatrical account of middle eastern culture. Point being, there is no end unless you leave, and leave it in a disintegrating chaos. a.k.a. bringing troops home. too bad for the hawks as we are currently witnessing in Congress . . . but ultimately good for Trump and good for America.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
Post Reply