on CSPAN (1200pm est 18Oct2019), Scalise and Hoyer are debating impeachment inquiry and Hoyer is getting owned. Yet another exposure of how flimsy this latest DNC tactic has been constructed. Anyone else paying attention?
#2020
#winning
Currently
-
_subgenius
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13326
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm
Currently
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
-
_Icarus
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:01 pm
Re: Currently
What's there to debate?
The President has committed numerous impeachable offenses. That's not debatable anymore. Even the Trump TV Network has stated this on numerous occasions.
What's the "DNC Tactic"? Was it a DNC tactic that made Trump do impeachable things?
Scalise is complaining about Pelosi holding the inquiry without a vote and we know this drives Trump absolutely bonkers because he likes to be in control and he wants to be able to figure out who is saying what so he can preemptively call them names and threaten them, but the Constitution is clear. Pelosi gets to say how this inquiry will be conducted, not Trump and not his henchmen. Maybe they should just "get over it."
The President has committed numerous impeachable offenses. That's not debatable anymore. Even the Trump TV Network has stated this on numerous occasions.
What's the "DNC Tactic"? Was it a DNC tactic that made Trump do impeachable things?
Scalise is complaining about Pelosi holding the inquiry without a vote and we know this drives Trump absolutely bonkers because he likes to be in control and he wants to be able to figure out who is saying what so he can preemptively call them names and threaten them, but the Constitution is clear. Pelosi gets to say how this inquiry will be conducted, not Trump and not his henchmen. Maybe they should just "get over it."
"One of the hardest things for me to accept is the fact that Kevin Graham has blonde hair, blue eyes and an English last name. This ugly truth blows any arguments one might have for actual white supremacism out of the water. He's truly a disgrace." - Ajax
-
_Dr. Shades
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14117
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm
Re: Currently
subgenius wrote:on CSPAN (1200pm est 18Oct2019), Scalise and Hoyer are debating impeachment inquiry and Hoyer is getting owned.
So, is the person "getting owned" pro-impeachment or anti-impeachment?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
--Louis Midgley
--Louis Midgley
-
_Icarus
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:01 pm
Re: Currently
Dr. Shades wrote:subgenius wrote:on CSPAN (1200pm est 18Oct2019), Scalise and Hoyer are debating impeachment inquiry and Hoyer is getting owned.
So, is the person "getting owned" pro-impeachment or anti-impeachment?
Presumably, a guy ranting on and on about unfairness is his idea of owning.
Here is a Republican legal expert explaining why Republicans like this guy are wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fofvwnp9uqI
"One of the hardest things for me to accept is the fact that Kevin Graham has blonde hair, blue eyes and an English last name. This ugly truth blows any arguments one might have for actual white supremacism out of the water. He's truly a disgrace." - Ajax