Nancy Pelosi wrote:Well, all this milieu is a seeking of the truth. It's called an inquiry. And if the president has something that it--is exculpatory, Mr. President, that means you have anything that shows your innocence, then he should make that known and that's part of the inquiry. And so far, we haven't seen that, but we welcome it. And that's what an inquiry's about.
I damned love that Pelosi felt the need to explain to Trump, the little damned child, what "exculpatory" means. I heard her do it and it made my whole day.
LOL
ETA: I guess why I find this so funny is that if there was any word Trump is unlikely to understand, exculpatory is probably high on the list.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
Now I’m stuck with a mental picture of Pelosi making out with Perfume. I don’t know whether to feel aroused or repulsed.
“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”
― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
Perfume on my Mind wrote:ETA: I guess why I find this so funny is that if there was any word Trump is unlikely to understand, exculpatory is probably high on the list.
LOL
It’s relatively easy to agree that only Homo sapiens can speak about things that don’t really exist, and believe six impossible things before breakfast. You could never convince a monkey to give you a banana by promising him limitless bananas after death in monkey heaven.
Res Ipsa wrote:Now I’m stuck with a mental picture of Pelosi making out with Perfume. I don’t know whether to feel aroused or repulsed.
You don't know what I look like, so if you want, you could just imagine Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez making out with Pelosi. That should soften the blow.
ETA: and yeah, I understand. I wouldn't want that mental image either.
LOL. I was thinking of the band...
“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”
― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
Only the idiotic OP would celebrate Pelosi's overt "guilty until proven innocent " position. Only a moron would find "I accuse you, so now you must prove your innocence" admirable.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
subgenius wrote:Only the idiotic OP would celebrate Pelosi's overt "guilty until proven innocent " position. Only a moron would find "I accuse you, so now you must prove your innocence" admirable.
Then why is this the position that you always adopt?
subgenius wrote:Only the idiotic OP would celebrate Pelosi's overt "guilty until proven innocent " position. Only a moron would find "I accuse you, so now you must prove your innocence" admirable.
Then why is this the position that you always adopt?
cool, you think the OP is like me...what an endorsement
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
