Let’s examine some lame arguments:huckelberry wrote:He proposes that Anne Franks book was written after she died.
Which book? There are several different versions with conflicting details, missing entries, etc.
Did you know that, Boomer?
If that were so it would be a literary curiosity but it would have no meaning for the reality of Nazi final solution.
It doesn’t matter if the Book of Mormon was translated from an ancient text, it has no meaning for the reality of the restoration of the Gospel.
OK, Boomer.
Let’s continue.
There is a mountain of much more solid evidence which precedes the book.
Post just one. All I’m asking for is, A.) You define what you mean by the Holocaust, and B.) You post one piece of actual scientific evidence that it happened.
Shouldn’t be too difficult if a mountain of evidence proceeds a fake Diary.
Anne Franke herself made a second version in 1944 upon the loose papers.
Which one was published? The first or second version, or both?
Hey Smokey, I admit I can think of one good thing Hitler did, after all nobody is all bad. He sent millions of Nazis to their death on the eastern front. Go to Go to.
And here we have a Boomer exposing itself, whom might otherwise pretend to be peaceful and rational in other places, gleefully celebrating the death of millions of men they don’t know anything about. This is your brain on Holocaustism. Deprogram yourself.