At Times, Pelosi Makes Me want to Kiss Her on the Mouth

[_canpakes]

cool, you think the OP is like me...what an endorsement

There you go again, with your comprehension issues. If only your first sentence was the one I was referring to. ; )

[_aussieguy55]

I so admire the woman. She knows how to deal with the manchild in the Whitehouse. All the bills she has sent to the Senate to sit there are meant to make life better for people with wages and medicines. She knows what raising families is about while Trump kept changing his family structure and Don Jr has followed his father's example. That beautiful scene of her standing and talking to Trump. The men next to him were looking down at their desks. Trump has a new "spiritual adviser" in Paula White. He only has "the best people" Do a google on her to see how "best" she is.

[_moksha]

If exculpatory evidence existed, it would have been presented and Fox News would have it on a 24-hour news cycle for a month.

I prefer the imagery of Trump and that Russian bot Smokey smooching.

[_Icarus]

Only the idiotic OP would celebrate Pelosi's overt "guilty until proven innocent " position.
Only a moron would find "I accuse you, so now you must prove your innocence" admirable.

Only a moron would understand that to be Pelosi's position. You're not very good at this stuff are you?

Republicans have no defense other than to keep pushing this idea that the Democrats are refusing to allow them to call their own witnesses. Not true. They're also claiming that Trump has a right to free speech and should have his say. Well, then come do it under oath like everyone else. That's all she is saying. But he won't because he knows he cannot stop lying, and lying under oath is a crime.

Pelosi is completely owning Trump and it drives him crazy. The trial phase happens in the Senate, Pelosi is doing everything by the book and Republicans are scrambling for any kind of defense they can get. They look desperate, dumb, and pathetic.

[_subgenius]

Well, all this milieu is a seeking of the truth. It's called an inquiry. And if the president has something that it--is exculpatory, Mr. President, that means you have anything that shows your innocence, then he should make that known and that's part of the inquiry. And so far, we haven't seen that, but we welcome it. And that's what an inquiry's about.

I damned love that Pelosi felt the need to explain to Trump, the little damned child, what "exculpatory" means. I heard her do it and it made my whole day.

LOL

ETA: I guess why I find this so funny is that if there was any word Trump is unlikely to understand, exculpatory is probably high on the list.

only a moron would applaud Pelosi's twisted view here...according to dimwits like PoMM when one is accused it is the burden of the accused to prove innocence.

It concludes that PoMM was a big supporter of Dick Cheney's rationale of "if you have nothing top hide, then you have nothing to worry about".

I would ask for assurance that the OP is not as stupid as it appears...but alas.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 11, states: "Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense.".

[_subgenius]

For example:

Clearly from the bulk of posts by PoMM, PoMM is the bastard product of inbredding between KG and KG's much dumber meth-addicted 2nd cousin on his sister's side.

If PoMM would provide some exculpatory evidence that proves this is not the truth...then by all means do so...this board has not seen any such exculpatory evidence to date.

Let us all now wait for PoMM to post some exculpatory evidence that proves my accusation as wrong.

[_subgenius]

Only the idiotic OP would celebrate Pelosi's overt "guilty until proven innocent " position.
Only a moron would find "I accuse you, so now you must prove your innocence" admirable.

Then why is this the position that you always adopt?

Now you are on my side?...or are you saying the OP is "like me"?

[_subgenius]

Only the idiotic OP would celebrate Pelosi's overt "guilty until proven innocent " position.
Only a moron would find "I accuse you, so now you must prove your innocence" admirable.

Only a moron would understand that to be Pelosi's position. You're not very good at this stuff are you?

Republicans have no defense other than to keep pushing this idea that the Democrats are refusing to allow them to call their own witnesses. Not true. They're also claiming that Trump has a right to free speech and should have his say. Well, then come do it under oath like everyone else. That's all she is saying. But he won't because he knows he cannot stop lying, and lying under oath is a crime.

Pelosi is completely owning Trump and it drives him crazy. The trial phase happens in the Senate, Pelosi is doing everything by the book and Republicans are scrambling for any kind of defense they can get. They look desperate, dumb, and pathetic.

No defense is necessary...its not Trump's burden...the evidence has to come from Pelosi, and that hasn't happened...not with Russia, Stormy, Dr Ford, Kavanaugh, emoluments, taxes, etc..and not with Ukraine. Check your fancy legal dictionary for hearsay when you get a chance, it should be in the chapter before innuendo but after gossip.

[_canpakes]

Then why is this the position that you always adopt?

Now you are on my side?...or are you saying the OP is "like me"?

subs? Are you going senile? We’ve already had this conversation, a few posts back. ; )

Wow. What consumption of conservative media will do to a mind ...