Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:sounds on par with the majority of Democrats. impressive.
All of which would outshine the Grifter in Chief, to include the couch, by a country mile.
I was referring to your voting goals being homogeneous with the other hair fire boobs.
But yeah, tax reform, the wall, criminal justice reform, USMCA, record unemployment among minorities, and the Clinton-esque political machine in shambles....
If that's grifting, then grifting it shall be. Get you a prescription for Nov 2020.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
I do think the GiC did a pretty good job with criminal justice reform. What was it about criminal justice reform you think was groundbreaking?
- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
The State of the Union speech was nothing special. Folks were either cheering or not cheering. Trump refused to shake her hand. She invited him to give the speech duh!
Last edited by Rosebud on Wed Feb 05, 2020 3:16 am, edited 2 times in total.
Hilary Clinton " I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP.I won in places are optimistic diverse, dynamic, moving forward"
aussieguy55 wrote:Should we be concerned about Trump's obesity? Bloomberg is.
It is the extra high excrement content of Trump's weight that is most concerning. If it was all removed, it is estimated that he would only weigh 19.5 lbs.
DoubtingThomas wrote:Bernie Sanders had a big victory in Iowa beating the second place winner with more than 10% points.
Solid posting as always DT.
I just noticed that was the OP, from before the caucusing had started. It begs the question where DT got his information and what led him to post it? It really doesn't make sense.
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth? ~ Eiji Yoshikawa
honorentheos wrote:I just noticed that was the OP, from before the caucusing had started. It begs the question where DT got his information and what led him to post it? It really doesn't make sense.
At first I just assumed he mistook one of the final polls for the result but looking back at them on RCP I can't find a single one that puts him anywhere near a 10+ lead. Maybe there was some internal Sanders polling that showed that but I'm not willing to try to track it down.
I'm sure this is just an honest error and not at all indicative of a strong bias from DT towards a specific candidate that we may or may not already have evidence of in other threads.
moksha wrote:It looks like Mayor Pete is leading.
At least in the "delegate equivalent" count, the other two counting methods have Sanders ahead (side note: Iowa's method is just really bat crap crazy to me).
"If you consider what are called the virtues in mankind, you will find their growth is assisted by education and cultivation." -Xenophon of Athens