Markk wrote:Some Schmo wrote:. I have a very low opinion of people.
LOL.. ya think
Markk wrote:Some Schmo wrote:. I have a very low opinion of people.
LOL.. ya think
Some Schmo wrote:. I have a very low opinion of people.
Markk wrote:LOL.. ya think
Some Schmo wrote:And rightfully so. After all, people actually defend and even support Trump. There has to be something fundamentally wrong with you for that to be your position, most likely unforgivable willful ignorance (the most deference to doubt among the options).
Markk wrote:Smile once in a while Schmo.
canpakes wrote:OK. My mistake for misreading the comment. So back to the original question.
How is Hunter's pay necessarily indicative of corruption?
And, what about those crazy Ukrainians not seeing any Biden Crime Family conspiracy?
A more honest comparison would be to compare Biden's compensation to that of the S&P 500 companies. The situation changes a bit when you do this:
Some Schmo wrote:I smile all the time. I just have to avoid thinking about politics or the quality of people.
Markk wrote:That is what Trolls do, they just create a straw-man argument...and then keep parroting while ignoring what people are saying.
Have you watched the video link I gave you yet, have you watched the series? My guess is no, in that you are a self admitted troll.
Anyways...
Focus...if you don't understand that there are multiple reasons that the Biden's and associates look dirty, I am not sure you will ever understand.
The highly inflated salary is just one part of the reason they look so dirty...and again, among other key reasons is that his boss was and is a criminal with deep Russian ties. Hunter's father is the VP of the United States and charged by President to "root out corruption" in the Ukraine...but also negotiate the terms of their receiving billions in aid. There is also the meeting in the White House with a Rosemont future Burisma board member...and the timing of monies deposited in their account, and Joe's meeting in the Ukraine at around the same time to finalize terms of aid going directly to the Natural Gas industry in the Ukraine...etc
Because you are a self admitted troll, you continually ignore the mountains of evidence, and try to some how force the Biden's possible corruption evidence into your silly and obvious straw-man.
Take a step back, do a honest study of all the evidence that points to possible corruption here with the Biden's and associates (in the Ukraine, China, and other places).
Shokin had around 5 or 6 active investigations into Burisma at the time he was fired by the VP quid pro quo (watch the links I gave you). And, many US newspaper in 2014 were warning of how this looks...go back and actually read some of the links I provided on this in th last thread.
Again a ignorant straw-man question.
One thing to note, is that the Ukrainian people were kept ignorant of the corruption in their country. It was reported...which I linked to in the last thread, that while Mykola Zlochevsky, Hunter's future criminal boss with deep Russian ties, was the minister Ecology and Natural Resources and deputy secretary on National Security and Defense Council (NSDC)...he also OWNED and o prated Burisma and granted his company licensing agreements.
Compare it to Exxon...about 50K a year for a managing director.
If you really want to be honest, the average board member in the Ukraine earns 337 110 of their currency (Hryvnia) a year...with an exchange of 0.040 to the dollar...which is what around 15 K a year?
FOCUS....Hunter pretty much admitted in the ABC interview, which I also linked and you most likely ducked, that the only reason he got the position was becasue of his name...period. He was being used by a known criminal, who has since fled the country, and living in Monaco where offshore accounts are many, and who had very deep Russian ties..BECAUSE Hunter's father was the Vice President of the United States, and charged by Obama the negotiate the terms of US aid, and to Root out corruption.
It really does not get any more clearer that this that there is enough concern here to warrant an investigation...which is happening.
You can either deal with all the facts, or keep creating straw-man arguments and just troll them like you admitted you were doing. Th choice is yours. I will just keep adding more evidence as I read into them more an more and as the current ongoing investigation might uncover.
Regarding board member pay - now you’re trying to work currency conversion rates into your defense, and compare pay given non-Ukrainians to the average salaries of Ukrainian citizens ... after claiming that Biden’s pay was too high, even as you can’t justify why it’s too high, or tell me what makes high pay an indication of corruption anyway. Maybe you just hate capitalism. I don’t know.
Markk wrote:LOL...You stuck your foot in your mouth and exposed your true colors. It is really just complimenting your never answering questions and parroting the same question that has been answered over and over. Honor called you out on this and you just verified in your own words what you are...a troll.
More trolling...focus...
The highly inflated salary is just one part of the reason they look so dirty...and again, among other key reasons is that his boss was and is a criminal with deep Russian ties. Hunter's father is the VP of the United States and charged by President to "root out corruption" in the Ukraine...but also negotiate the terms of their receiving billions in aid. There is also the meeting in the White House with a Rosemont future Burisma board member...and the timing of monies deposited in their account, and Joe's meeting in the Ukraine at around the same time to finalize terms of aid going directly to the Natural Gas industry in the Ukraine...etc
Your whole existence is this thread is the two questions you keep trolling...beyond those questions you have nothing, you refuse to address, answer, or expound on my questions and research the links I give you.
I doubt if you have even read the articles of impeachment, the WB complaints, and you certainly haven't investigated the issues.
You ducked this , I'll try again
FOCUS....Hunter pretty much admitted in the ABC interview, which I also linked and you most likely ducked, that the only reason he got the position was becasue of his name...period. He was being used by a known criminal, who has since fled the country, and living in Monaco where offshore accounts are many, and who had very deep Russian ties..BECAUSE Hunter's father was the Vice President of the United States, and charged by Obama the negotiate the terms of US aid, and to Root out corruption.
He admits it was most likely because of his name. Who else would hire a troubled person, with problems of addiction, at a crazy inflated salary, if it was not just becasue of his name...and by default his connections. Archer, Hunter's business partner at Rosemont... met with Joe in the White House, received 112K from Burisma, and boom, he met with Joe in the White House right at the time he was finalizing the terms of aid to the natural gas industry in the Ukraine, and then he and Hunter were hired by Burisma.
Because I ask you these types of real question repeatably...and you never ever expound on them...why? Because you are a troll...all you have are two tired questions that have been answered over and over.
I tell you what...expound on this last point I just italicized ...and lets see what you have, or just keep trolling?
FOCUS....Hunter pretty much admitted in the ABC interview, which I also linked and you most likely ducked, that the only reason he got the position was becasue of his name...period. He was being used by a known criminal, who has since fled the country, and living in Monaco where offshore accounts are many, and who had very deep Russian ties..BECAUSE Hunter's father was the Vice President of the United States, and charged by Obama the negotiate the terms of US aid, and to Root out corruption.