$54 million in "free" money? Why would they not take it?
Sadly, I have to agree with the sentiment behind this question. The government is interested in saving big business and LDS owns parts of some pretty big business.
Hmmm. The Harvard endowment fund is ~$40b. Harvard gives back $8m in relief aid. LDS fund that we know of, ~$130b. BYU will never give back the $54m in relief aid. Secular 1, Religious 0.
This headline just crossed on Bloomberg, and it's highly relevant to BYU's decision. If the apostles and administrators there care about public perception, they'll quickly realize that not only should they give the money back, but they need to make sure every bank involved in the funding removes their name from the list of beneficiaries of the program.
Be assured, there WILL be a wall of shame when this is over, for companies that took federal PPP money, but didn't really need it.
*FED TO NAME PARTICIPANTS IN CARES ACT-BACKED LOAN PROGRAMS
I agree with Dr. Moore. This is really not acceptable. The LDS Church has exploited every advantage it could and this is a bridge too far. There are small businesses everywhere hurting. Many will go under. If Shake Shack can return $10 million, then the LDS Church, with its stockpile of billions, can certainly return a little more than 5 times that much.
It will be interesting to see if they do give it back. But we all suspect it won't do so. Just think of how much GOOD they can do with that money! That will be their justification. Besides, it will prevent them from having to go for those wet rainy day funds..... we wouldn't really want the filthy, filthy, FILTHY RICH church to suffer would we? Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
CNBC reporting on new guidance for the SMB loan program:
Companies applying for coronavirus relief funds must certify that the loans are necessary and that they cannot tap other sources of funding, the SBA said.
Yes, BYU may have been grandfathered in, but by keeping the money it is acting in very bad faith.