EXPOSED Where does Lemmie get all of her ideas?

[Guest]

Stop making sexist posts

Note that he was a 35 year old teacher and the girl was his 14 year old student when the girl's parents called the police. He plrd guilty ... included a 10 year stint on the Sex Offender Registry...Personally, I think jail time [Only?] in this case would have been far more appropriate

Dear wise penguin, please post a dick pic

The Female Dating Strategy is an anti-men hate group know for misrepresentation, exaggerated claims, quoting out of context, and demonizing men. The most extreme members make threats againt men and call for castration. Female Dating Strategy group is also anti-sex work, calls it paid rape. I found some patterns between Lemmie and the Female Dating Strategy.

A member of the female dating strategy wrote:

Older men who pursue girls in their late teens and early 20s are predatory...Many 18-year-olds are still finishing up high school. And they always use the law to justify their actions by saying its “legal” and “she’s an adult”. Shut up. These men know that they are just trying to _____ the youngest tail they legally can.

From the same page in the comments

"I'd see a LOT of older dudes try to get close to the 18-22 year old newbies as "friends.""

Lemmie's straw man comment (I made no such claim)

you are fixated on virgins aged 18-22

Notice the similarities? I wonder what I could find if I look for hours. I am convinced Lemmie gets all of her ideas from the Female Dating Strategy, end of the story.

[_DoubtingThomas]

It am just kidding, but Lemmie is serious about looking for stupid patterns. She was so Mormon.

[_Morley]

Look how much these are the same! Lemmie must be copying from this site!

[_Lemmie]

Stop making sexist posts

Note that he was a 35 year old teacher and the girl was his 14 year old student when the girl's parents called the police. He plrd guilty ... included a 10 year stint on the Sex Offender Registry...Personally, I think jail time [Only?] in this case would have been far more appropriate

Lol. In an OP where DoubtingThomas is trying to argue I misquote him and set up strawman arguments, he has cut and pasted two DIFFERENT comments by me, deleted parts, and even added words that further mischaracterize my point. Here is the entirety of my words in my post on feb 13,

Note that he was a 35 year old teacher and the girl was his 14 year old student when the girl's parents called the police. He plrd guilty to a misdemeanor and his sentence of community service also included a 10 year stint on the Sex Offender Registry.

http://mormondiscussions.com/viewtopic. ... 5#p1111265

Later I said this, from which he cropped the last remark and stuck it, out of context with the first:

You can condemn his act, even argue for a jail sentence, while also thinking we aren't making society any better by banning him from Facebook and within 1000 feet of schools and libraries or whatever limitations he had imposed on him for a decade.

Absolutely, which is why I wanted to introduce some facts into the sensationalized but clearly incomplete story in the OP. These individual stories are invariably used to argue some emotion-backed absolute solution for all; meanwhile the true events are never quite so black and white. Personally, I think jail time in this case would have been far more appropriate.

http://mormondiscussions.com/viewtopic. ... 6#p1111296

If you’re going to accuse others of misquoting and straw man arguments, DT, you shouldn’t misquote them, add words, and construct a straw man out of pieces of their words you misrepresent in an attempt to make your case.

[_DoubtingThomas]

If you’re going to accuse others of misquoting and straw man arguments, DT, you shouldn’t misquote them, add words, and construct a straw man out of pieces of their words you misrepresent in an attempt to make your case.

You are missing the point.

[_Lemmie]

Lemmie's straw man comment (I made no such claim)

you are fixated on virgins aged 18-22

Lol.

From the OP of the thread originally titled “Half of all women are unattractive”:

The data is the reason why I think 18 to 22 are generally more attractive.

[Guest]

The data is the reason why I think 18 to 22 are generally more attractive.

DT alternative universe: "18-22 year old VIRGINS are ALWAYS more attractive"

In reality I said I wouldn't mind dating a woman with kids from a previous marriage.

[_ajax18]

18-22 year old women certainly don't often care if older women don't agree with them dating older men. While we keep our blame focused on men who cheat, the women who cheat with them usually know these men are already married. They're no more loyal to each other than any other cartel.

If you got money, women of all ages will be interested. But you'd be wise to not fall for this trap.

[_Some Schmo]

It occurs to me reading this thread that there seems to be a direct correlation between having a crappy attitude toward the opposite sex and having a negative experience with the opposite sex.

That's quite a mystery. What could possibly account for it?

[_ajax18]

That's quite a mystery. What could possibly account for it?

Follow the money.

If it were my attitude about the opposite sex I wouldn't have had such good relationships with my mother, grandmother, daughter, etc. My attitude is bad about romantic relationships. Do you think that's just something I decided in a vacuum with no real life experiences that might have shaped that?