Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Lemmie »

Louis Midgley:

I will immediately cease pointing to these stupid, nasty, demonic attacks on me by Moksha and his buddies, if and only if he will apologize for having been part of this, and also promise never again to engage on sic et non or on the Dr. Shades board.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... 4926059835
That is just laughable. Really?

Well, so be it. It has been decided. Midgley will continue to point out that others have noticed his inappropriate behavior. Have at it, Midge.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Keeviler Elf gon’ keevil. What a huge baby. A bully goes all the way to New Zealand, HAVING ANNOUNCED HIS INTENTIONS PRIOR TO DO SO, to confront Ms. Colvin, enlists the Area Presidency (!) in his keevil scheme, and when people don’t take kindly to a bully being a bully and punch back he, like the nasty little bully he is, bursts into tears and runs to mommy’s blog to point fingers.

What a disaster of a human being. BYU professor. Mormon priesthood holder. Stolen valor sack of crap.

- Doc
_Philo Sofee
_Emeritus
Posts: 6660
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:04 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Philo Sofee »

Dr Lod
So he wants an apology because others pointed out the truth of his abnormal behavior, and his warped idea of how a “so called saint” conducts themselves. Sorry old man you had plenty of years to grow up.
In Mormon culture, apparently this is what maturity is like. In Utah culture at least. I wonder... truly and really, if all the Maori's who know him would be able to read all his comments and agree he is a true and real spiritual leader? That would make a FASCINATING study. Shall we begin contacting the LDS Maori and sending his materials to them WITHOUT naming him, and asking them what they think of a Mormon who talks and acts like this? That could be truly enlightening!!!
_Dr LOD
_Emeritus
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 6:24 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Dr LOD »

Philo Sofee wrote:
Mon May 25, 2020 1:30 am
Dr Lod
So he wants an apology because others pointed out the truth of his abnormal behavior, and his warped idea of how a “so called saint” conducts themselves. Sorry old man you had plenty of years to grow up.
In Mormon culture, apparently this is what maturity is like. In Utah culture at least. I wonder... truly and really, if all the Maori's who know him would be able to read all his comments and agree he is a true and real spiritual leader? That would make a FASCINATING study. Shall we begin contacting the LDS Maori and sending his materials to them WITHOUT naming him, and asking them what they think of a Mormon who talks and acts like this? That could be truly enlightening!!!
He about had a stroke when I mentioned contacting one of them.
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

I really wish someone would attempt to contact some of the Maori that Midgley claims to be so sympathetic towards. If it's no problem for him to contact Gina Colvin's husband, they why would it be any trouble at all if someone dropped a line to one of these Maori folks? I mean, an email or social media DM is far less intrusive that taking a cruise and showing up at somebody's actual ward, right?
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _moksha »

Midgley wrote:I will immediately cease pointing to these stupid, nasty, demonic attacks on me by Moksha and his buddies, if and only if he will apologize for having been part of this, and also promise never again to engage on sic et non or on the Dr. Shades board.
Yikes, I hate ominous threats, especially when they come from someone with the backing of a private organization. Give up posting at Sic et Non and this board in exchange for my safety and wellbeing? He does have a history of following up on his threats. I wish those apologists could be as gentle as the Methodists or Hari Krishnas. One aged man is but a paltry thing, but he has been known to take road trips with his younger buddies.
_Paloma
_Emeritus
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:26 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Paloma »

Hey, penguin soldier!
It looks like you may be needing that protective armour!

At another time I likened Professor Midgley to Smeagol/Gollum. While I feel kind of badly for making an unsavoury comparison (and I hold to the view that Prof. M is no doubt a kind and likeable man in many ways) ... let me try to explain why this image comes to me.

The first time I became aware of Louis Midgley he popped up out of nowhere on the Shields website, in correspondence that William Hamblin had been conducting with James White. It surprised JW to the point where he said something like, "where is my private correspondence with William Hamblin being posted and shared?" LM proceeded to come across as someone who had every right to insert himself into the story (ie. letter missives) and to expect JW to recognize him and provide answers to his questions. In asking these questions,LM appeared as betimes obsequious and pleading as in. "It's little old me asking a teeny tiny favour of you ... surely you don't mind?" and then increasingly aggressive, hostile and demanding when JW didn't furnish him with what he wanted. LM ended each letter with "Grace and Peace, Louis Midgley" ... which seems disingenuous - you know, something like how in recent comments on his blog, DCP has said to Charles that Charles calling him "Brother Peterson" is "disingenuous, and he won't have it!" After the first couple of exchanges, JW didn't engage at all, other than to repeatedly respond with something like "Thanks for writing. I don't care to interact with you further." I didn't count, but there must be close to 10 fairly lengthy email letters that LM wrote before the correspondence ceased.

And so from the very first, i had a picture of LM as a seemingly gentle, curious, big-eyed imploring soul who harboured within a steely-eyed dangerous persona ready to strike.
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Lemmie »

moksha wrote:
Mon May 25, 2020 4:30 am
Midgley wrote:I will immediately cease pointing to these stupid, nasty, demonic attacks on me by Moksha and his buddies, if and only if he will apologize for having been part of this, and also promise never again to engage on sic et non or on the Dr. Shades board.
Yikes, I hate ominous threats, especially when they come from someone with the backing of a private organization. Give up posting at Sic et Non and this board in exchange for my safety and wellbeing? He does have a history of following up on his threats. I wish those apologists could be as gentle as the Methodists or Hari Krishnas. One aged man is but a paltry thing, but he has been known to take road trips with his younger buddies.
Great comment, Moksha. Those who do not understand humor and irony have responded:

DanielPeterson Mod Moksha • 35 minutes ago • edited

...if commenting here genuinely leaves you fearing for your health and safety, perhaps you should withdraw from participation on this blog.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... 4927271179
Lol. Calling off his attack dog Midgley would accomplish this task so much more efficiently, wouldn’t it?

Speaking of projection,
Louis Midgley

It turns out that [ I am ] a good example of one with a "chip on his shoulder." Why? A quick check indicates that "To have a chip on one's shoulder refers to the act of holding a grudge or grievance that readily provokes disputation." This is a perfect description of [me].

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... 4927227892
FTFY, Midge!
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

They obsessively follow every jot and tittle on this blog on an hourly basis, don’t they!

- Doc
Last edited by Guest on Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

The Midge crying about people ganging up on him:

“ This remark by Moksha is the first and only serious comment he has made. Otherwise, Moksha has been just a cynic with a desire to be cute as he takes swipes at things Latter-day Saints see as sacred, except when he is back with his supposed "friends" on that Shades board, or, more recently when he and his "friends" pounced on me on the "Kiwi Mormon" blog, which he even brought back to Professor Peterson's blog. He refused to apologize, I suppose because those on the Shades board would not like it.”

“This is certainly not the kind of comment that Moksha made when he and his associates blasted away at me when I made a perfectly harmless comment to Gina Colvin on her own "Kiwi Mormon" Patheos blog. Then he also brought that same disgusting, nasty stuff to sic et non.”

“This is the cute Moksha. When he is away from sic et non, and with own kind on the Shades board, he is a far different creature. He recently joined in what his associates and Shady mentors had been been practicing, when some of those rabble pounced on me on the "Kiwi Mormon" Patheos blog. And he recently brought more of that truly reprehensible rubbish to sic et non.”

The Midge gloating about ganging up on a poster:

“Fred Kratz does seem to be more and more angry. I don't think that I am the only one who has noticed that he has recently become more and more contentious. And this has also resulted him his getting a good spanking, has it not?”

Aside from obsessively checking this forum for content to moan about, we can see him relentlessly attack Moksha, Gemli, Fred Katz, Noel, LOD, Exiled, and anyone else who he deems an enemy combatant. Crazier yet, when people he dislikes take a sabbatical from posting on SeN, he constantly attacks them and more often than not asks for them to come back!

What an absolute loon!

- Doc
Post Reply